• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所流言蜚语的归因过程模型。

An attributional process model of workplace gossip.

作者信息

Lee Stephen H, Barnes Christopher M

机构信息

Department of Management and Organization.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):300-316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000504
PMID:32297765
Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of gossip in the workplace, the management literature offers a limited understanding of its consequences for gossip senders. To understand whether gossiping is beneficial or detrimental for the gossip sender, it is necessary to consider the perspective of gossip recipients and their response to gossip. We develop a typology of gossip that characterizes archetypal patterns of interpreting gossip. We then draw from attribution theory to develop a multilevel process model of workplace gossip that focuses on how the gossip recipient's attributions of a gossip episode shape the gossip recipient's subsequent response and behaviors. In addition to the valence and work-relatedness dimensions of gossip that comprise the typology, we examine credibility and the status of the gossip target as fundamental features of the gossip episode that jointly affect the gossip recipient's attributions. At the episodic level, the process of deciphering the gossip sender's motives influences the subsequent reciprocation of gossip. Depending on the locus of causality attributed to the gossip episode, gossip also contributes to the perceived trustworthiness of the gossip sender and the gossip recipient's cooperation with or social undermining of the gossip sender over time. The proposed model suggests that the potential benefits or social consequences of gossip for the gossip sender depend on the characteristics of the gossip and the context of the gossip episode that serve as inputs to the gossip recipient's attributional process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

尽管职场中流言蜚语无处不在,但管理文献对其给流言传播者带来的后果了解有限。要理解说闲话对传播者是有益还是有害,有必要考虑流言接收者的视角以及他们对流言的反应。我们构建了一种流言类型学,描述了解读流言的典型模式。然后我们借鉴归因理论,开发了一个职场流言的多层次过程模型,该模型关注流言接收者对流言事件的归因如何塑造其后续反应和行为。除了构成该类型学的流言效价和与工作相关性维度外,我们还将可信度和流言目标的地位作为流言事件的基本特征进行考察,这些特征共同影响流言接收者的归因。在事件层面,解读流言传播者动机的过程会影响后续的流言回应。根据对流言事件归因的因果关系位置,随着时间的推移,流言也会影响人们对流言传播者的可信度认知,以及流言接收者与流言传播者的合作或社会破坏行为。所提出的模型表明,流言对传播者的潜在益处或社会后果取决于流言的特征以及流言事件的背景,这些因素是流言接收者归因过程的输入。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
An attributional process model of workplace gossip.工作场所流言蜚语的归因过程模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):300-316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Don't Shoot the Messenger? A Morality- and Gender-Based Model of Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip.不要迁怒于报信人?一种基于道德和性别的职场负面八卦反应模型。
J Bus Ethics. 2023 Mar 4:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7.
3
Gossiping the (recipient's) day away: The impact of supervisor-directed gossip on recipients' rumination, sleep quality, vitality, and work outcomes.闲聊(接收者)一整天:主管导向的闲聊对接收者沉思、睡眠质量、活力和工作成果的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Aug;109(8):1311-1326. doi: 10.1037/apl0001181. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Don't Speak Ill of Others Behind Their Backs: Receivers' Ostracism (Sender-Oriented)  Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip.不要在背后说别人坏话:接收者对负面职场八卦的排斥(以发送者为导向)反应。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jan 6;14:1-16. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S288961. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.
6
When is gossiping wrong? The influence of valence and relationships on children's moral evaluations of gossip.什么时候说闲话是错的?亲疏关系和事情好坏对儿童评价闲话道德性的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;38(2):219-238. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12319. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
7
Are gossipers looked down upon? A norm-based perspective on the relation between gossip and gossiper status.爱说闲话的人会被看不起吗?基于规范的视角看待闲话和说闲话者地位之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jun;108(6):905-933. doi: 10.1037/apl0001056. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
8
Why does subordinates' negative workplace gossip lead to supervisor undermining? A moderated mediation model.为什么下属的负面职场八卦会导致上级受到伤害?一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:981539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981539. eCollection 2022.
9
Silence Is Golden. Six Reasons Inhibiting the Spread of Third-Party Gossip.沉默是金。抑制第三方流言传播的六个原因。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01120. eCollection 2019.
10
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative workplace gossip and turnover intention among kindergarten teachers: psychological safety as a mediator and organizational identification as a moderator.幼儿园教师中的负面职场八卦与离职意向:心理安全感作为中介变量以及组织认同作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1588482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588482. eCollection 2025.
2
Positive Gossip Fuels Creativity: The Roles of Cognitive Crafting and Risk Taking.积极的流言蜚语激发创造力:认知加工与冒险的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 24;15(6):727. doi: 10.3390/bs15060727.
3
Sexual Assault Gossip: Who Do We Share with and Why?
性侵犯传闻:我们与谁分享以及为何分享?
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jan;54(1):259-275. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03045-7. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Why Talking Is Not Cheap: Adverse Events and Informal Communication.为何交谈并非易事:不良事件与非正式沟通
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;12(6):635. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060635.
5
Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip.恶劣与高尚并存:相互依存结构驱动自利八卦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1596-1612. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171054. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Is not workplace gossip bad? The effect of positive workplace gossip on employee innovative behavior.职场八卦难道不好吗?积极的职场八卦对员工创新行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 24;13:1017202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017202. eCollection 2022.
7
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.
8
Gossip promotes cooperation only when it is pro-socially motivated.当八卦是出于亲社会动机时,它才会促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 21;12(1):4790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08670-7.
9
Capturing Workplace Gossip as Dynamic Conversational Events: First Insights From Care Team Meetings.将职场八卦作为动态对话事件进行捕捉:护理团队会议的初步见解
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:725720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725720. eCollection 2021.
10
Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review.可靠声誉和合作网络:综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200297. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0297. Epub 2021 Oct 4.