• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角

Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.

作者信息

Estévez José Luis, Takács Károly

机构信息

Department of Management and Engineering, The Institute for Analytical Sociology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.

Department for the Study of Religions, Centre for the Digital Research of Religion, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383
PMID:35898991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9309222/
Abstract

Brokerage is a central concept in the organization literature. It has been argued that individuals in broker positions-i.e., connecting otherwise disconnected parts within a firm's social network-can control the flow of information. It would imply their increased relevance in workplace gossip. This allegation, however, has not been addressed empirically yet. To fill this gap, we apply social network analysis techniques to relational data from six organizations in Hungary. First, we identify informal groups and individuals in broker positions. Then, we use this information to predict the likelihood with which positive or negative gossip is reported. We find more gossip when the sender and receiver are part of the same group and more positive gossip about in-group rather than out-group targets. Individuals in broker positions are more likely the senders and targets of negative gossip. Finally, even if both the brokers and the boss(es) are the targets of their colleagues' negative gossip, the combination of the two categories (bosses in broker positions) does not predict more negative gossip anymore. Results are discussed in relation to the theoretical accounts on brokerage that emphasize its power for information control but fail to recognize the pitfalls of being in such positions.

摘要

经纪作用是组织文献中的一个核心概念。有人认为,处于经纪位置的个体——即在公司社交网络中连接原本不相连部分的人——能够控制信息流。这意味着他们在工作场所流言蜚语中的相关性增加。然而,这一说法尚未得到实证研究的验证。为了填补这一空白,我们将社交网络分析技术应用于来自匈牙利六个组织的关系数据。首先,我们识别处于经纪位置的非正式群体和个体。然后,我们利用这些信息来预测传播正面或负面流言蜚语的可能性。我们发现,当发送者和接收者属于同一群体时,流言蜚语更多,且更多是关于群体内部而非群体外部目标的正面流言蜚语。处于经纪位置的个体更有可能成为负面流言蜚语的发送者和目标。最后,即使经纪人和老板都是同事负面流言蜚语的目标,但这两类人(处于经纪位置的老板)合在一起并不能预测更多的负面流言蜚语。我们结合关于经纪作用的理论阐述来讨论这些结果,这些理论强调其对信息控制的权力,但没有认识到处于这种位置的弊端。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/aa18dbd8d452/fpsyg-13-815383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/89d60ab7adb8/fpsyg-13-815383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/aeeb5f7578db/fpsyg-13-815383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/aa18dbd8d452/fpsyg-13-815383-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/89d60ab7adb8/fpsyg-13-815383-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/aeeb5f7578db/fpsyg-13-815383-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d3/9309222/aa18dbd8d452/fpsyg-13-815383-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Brokering or Sitting Between Two Chairs? A Group Perspective on Workplace Gossip.充当中间人还是两面不讨好?关于职场流言蜚语的群体视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:815383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815383. eCollection 2022.
2
An attributional process model of workplace gossip.工作场所流言蜚语的归因过程模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):300-316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
3
The paradox of agency: Feeling powerful reduces brokerage opportunity recognition yet increases willingness to broker.能动性悖论:感觉有能力会减少对中介机会的识别,但会增加充当中介的意愿。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Aug;103(8):929-938. doi: 10.1037/apl0000299. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Don't Speak Ill of Others Behind Their Backs: Receivers' Ostracism (Sender-Oriented)  Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip.不要在背后说别人坏话:接收者对负面职场八卦的排斥(以发送者为导向)反应。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jan 6;14:1-16. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S288961. eCollection 2021.
5
Bridging gaps: a systematic literature review of brokerage in educational change.弥合差距:教育变革中介入作用的系统文献综述
J Educ Chang. 2024;25(2):305-339. doi: 10.1007/s10833-023-09493-7. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
6
Don't Shoot the Messenger? A Morality- and Gender-Based Model of Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip.不要迁怒于报信人?一种基于道德和性别的职场负面八卦反应模型。
J Bus Ethics. 2023 Mar 4:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7.
7
Does positive workplace gossip help socialize newcomers? A dual-pathway model based on network ties.积极的职场八卦有助于新员工融入吗?基于网络关系的双通道模型。
Psych J. 2021 Oct;10(5):767-776. doi: 10.1002/pchj.468. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
The relationship between positive workplace gossip and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job insecurity and organizational identity.积极的职场八卦与工作满意度之间的关系:工作不安全感和组织认同的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 28;13:989380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989380. eCollection 2022.
9
Work-to-Family Spillover Effects of Workplace Negative Gossip: A Mediated Moderation Model.职场负面八卦的工作-家庭溢出效应:一个中介调节模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01612. eCollection 2020.
10
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Four Puzzles of Reputation-Based Cooperation : Content, Process, Honesty, and Structure.基于声誉的合作的四个谜题:内容、过程、诚实和结构。
Hum Nat. 2022 Mar;33(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling.合作的语言:声誉与诚实信号。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200286. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0286. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Gossip and reputation in everyday life.日常生活中的流言蜚语和名誉。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Being in the Know : Social Network Analysis of Gossip and Friendship on a College Campus.知情者:大学校园八卦和友谊的社会网络分析。
Hum Nat. 2021 Sep;32(3):603-621. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09409-5. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
5
Dealing With Negative Workplace Gossip: From the Perspective of Face.从面子的角度看应对职场负面流言蜚语的问题
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:629376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629376. eCollection 2021.
6
Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.负面八卦通过减少社会包容来降低目标对象的组织公民行为。一种多方法研究途径。
Group Organ Manag. 2021 Jun;46(3):463-497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
Truth, Lies, and Gossip.真相、谎言与八卦。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):702-714. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916708. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
An attributional process model of workplace gossip.工作场所流言蜚语的归因过程模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):300-316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
When is gossiping wrong? The influence of valence and relationships on children's moral evaluations of gossip.什么时候说闲话是错的?亲疏关系和事情好坏对儿童评价闲话道德性的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;38(2):219-238. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12319. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
10
The Bright and Dark Side of Gossip for Cooperation in Groups.群体合作中八卦的正反两面
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 20;10:1374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01374. eCollection 2019.