Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht, Oestrich-Winkel, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1596-1612. doi: 10.1177/01461672231171054. Epub 2023 May 25.
Much information people receive about others reaches them via gossip. But is this gossip trustworthy? We examined this in a scenario study ( = 350, = 700) and an interactive laboratory experiment ( = 126; = 3024). In both studies, participants played a sequential prisoner's dilemma where a gossip observed a 's (first decider's) decision and could gossip about this to a (second decider). We manipulated the interdependence structure such that gossipers' outcomes were equal to targets' outcomes, equal to receivers' outcomes, or independent. Compared to no interdependence, gossip was more often false when gossipers were interdependent with targets but not when interdependent with receivers. As such, false positive gossip (self-serving when interdependent with targets) increased but false negative gossip (self-serving when interdependent with receivers) did not. In conclusion, the interdependence structure affected gossip's trustworthiness: When gossipers' outcomes were interdependent with targets, gossip was less trustworthy.
人们从他人那里获得的很多信息都是通过八卦传播的。但是,这些八卦可信吗?我们在一个场景研究(n = 350,N = 700)和一个互动实验室实验(n = 126;N = 3024)中对此进行了检验。在这两项研究中,参与者都玩了一个顺序囚徒困境游戏,其中一个八卦者观察了“s”(第一个决策者)的决策,并可以将其八卦给“r”(第二个决策者)。我们操纵了相互依存结构,使得八卦者的结果与目标的结果相等,与接收者的结果相等,或者是独立的。与没有相互依存关系相比,当八卦者与目标相互依存时,八卦更有可能是虚假的,但当八卦者与接收者相互依存时,八卦则不是。因此,当八卦者与目标相互依存时,虚假的正面八卦(自我服务)会增加,但当八卦者与接收者相互依存时,虚假的负面八卦(自我服务)并没有增加。总之,相互依存结构影响了八卦的可信度:当八卦者的结果与目标相互依存时,八卦的可信度就会降低。