Suppr超能文献

加州 Proposition 56 烟草税后低收入和高收入成年人的吸烟行为。

Smoking Behavior in Low- and High-Income Adults Immediately Following California Proposition 56 Tobacco Tax Increase.

机构信息

Courtney Keeler is with the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Wendy Max, Tingting Yao, Yingning Wang, and Hai-Yen Sung are with the Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco. Xueying Zhang is with the California Department of Public Health, Sacramento.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2020 Jun;110(6):868-870. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305615. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Abstract

To compare the association of California Proposition 56 (Prop 56), which increased the cigarette tax by $2 per pack beginning on April 1, 2017, with smoking behavior among low- and high-income adults. Drawing on a sample of 17 206 low-income and 21 324 high-income adults aged 21 years or older from the 2012 to 2018 California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we explored 2 outcomes: current smoking prevalence and smoking intensity (average number of cigarettes per day among current smokers). For each income group, we estimated a multivariable logistic regression to analyze the association of Prop 56 with smoking prevalence and a multivariable linear regression to analyze the association of Prop 56 with smoking intensity. Although we observed no association between smoking intensity and Prop 56, we found a statistically significant decline in smoking prevalence among low-income adults following Prop 56. No such association was found among the high-income group. Given that low-income Californians smoke cigarettes at greater rates than those with higher incomes, our results provide evidence that Prop 56 is likely to reduce income disparities in cigarette smoking in California.

摘要

为了比较 2017 年 4 月 1 日起每包香烟增加 2 美元的加州提案 56(Prop 56)与高、低收入成年人吸烟行为之间的关联。我们利用来自 2012 年至 2018 年加州行为风险因素监测系统的数据,对 17206 名低收入成年人和 21324 名高收入成年人(年龄在 21 岁及以上)进行了抽样调查,我们探讨了两个结果:当前吸烟率和吸烟强度(当前吸烟者平均每天吸烟的数量)。对于每个收入群体,我们都进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以分析 Prop 56 与吸烟率的关联,以及多变量线性回归分析,以分析 Prop 56 与吸烟强度的关联。虽然我们没有发现吸烟强度与 Prop 56 之间的关联,但我们发现 Prop 56 之后,低收入成年人的吸烟率出现了统计学上的显著下降。在高收入群体中没有发现这种关联。鉴于低收入的加利福尼亚人吸烟的比例高于收入较高的人,我们的研究结果表明,Prop 56 可能会减少加利福尼亚州吸烟方面的收入差距。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The consequences of high cigarette excise taxes for low-income smokers.高香烟消费税对低收入烟民的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043838. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
4
The quarter that changed the world.改变世界的那个季度。
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-15. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030809.
5
Cigarette prices, smoking, and the poor: implications of recent trends.香烟价格、吸烟与贫困人口:近期趋势的影响
Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1873-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.090134. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
7
Are increases in cigarette taxation regressive?提高香烟税是否具有累退性?
Health Econ. 1992 Dec;1(4):245-53. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010406.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验