Borren P, Sutton M
Department of Economics, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
Health Econ. 1992 Dec;1(4):245-53. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730010406.
Using the latest published data from Tobacco Advisory Council surveys, this paper re-evaluates the question of whether or not increases in cigarette taxation are regressive in the United Kingdom. The extended data set shows no evidence of increasing price-elasticity by social class as found in a major previous study. To the contrary, there appears to be no clear pattern in the price responsiveness of smoking behaviour across different social classes. Increases in cigarette taxation, while reducing smoking levels in all groups, fall most heavily on men and women in the lowest social class. Men and women in social class five can expect to pay eight and eleven times more of a tax increase respectively, than their social class one counterparts. Taken as a proportion of relative incomes, the regressive nature of increases in cigarette taxation is even more pronounced.
利用烟草咨询委员会调查的最新公布数据,本文重新评估了在英国提高卷烟税是否具有累退性这一问题。扩展数据集并未显示出如先前一项主要研究所发现的那样,按社会阶层划分的价格弹性增加的证据。相反,不同社会阶层的吸烟行为对价格的反应似乎没有明显模式。提高卷烟税虽然会降低所有群体的吸烟水平,但对社会阶层最低的男性和女性影响最大。社会阶层五的男性和女性预计分别要比社会阶层一的同龄人多支付八倍和十一倍的增税。从相对收入的比例来看,卷烟税增加的累退性更加明显。