Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0257553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257553. eCollection 2021.
California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017.
Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011-2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a "synthetic" California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products.
Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco.
加州 Proposition 56 将每包香烟的消费税提高了 2 美元,对非香烟烟草产品也相应提高了消费税。我们估计了 2017 年加州 Proposition 56 实施后香烟价格、香烟使用量和非香烟使用量的变化。
使用 2011-2019 年的“当前人口调查烟草使用补充调查”(TUS-CPS)的七个波次数据,获取州级的汇总自我报告结果,包括每包香烟价格、当前和每日吸烟量、每天的香烟消耗量以及当前和每日使用的非香烟烟草制品(水烟、烟斗、雪茄和无烟烟草)。采用一种改良的合成控制方法,创建了一个“合成”加州,该加州最能反映出政策前的社会人口特征和加州的结果趋势,同时纠正了政策前不变的时间差异。还进行了各种敏感性分析。
加州 Proposition 56 的实施与自我报告的加州每包香烟价格的上涨有关($1.844,95%CI:$0.153,$3.534;p=0.032)。没有证据表明 Proposition 56 的实施与当前或每日吸烟量、每天的香烟消耗量或非香烟烟草制品的当前或每日使用率的变化有关。
加州 Proposition 56 增加的大部分香烟税都转嫁给了消费者。没有证据表明 Proposition 56 的实施与水烟、烟斗、雪茄和无烟烟草等香烟和其他烟草制品使用量的变化有关。