• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何像急诊护理人员一样思考:急诊护理决策的概念性思维模式

How to think like an emergency care provider: a conceptual mental model for decision making in emergency care.

作者信息

Al-Azri Nasser Hammad

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ibri Hospital, Ministry of Health, POB 134, 516 Akhdar, Ibri, Oman.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 16;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00274-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12245-020-00274-0
PMID:32299358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7164351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General medicine commonly adopts a strategy based on the analytic approach utilizing the hypothetico-deductive method. Medical emergency care and education have been following similarly the same approach. However, the unique milieu and task complexity in emergency care settings pose a challenge to the analytic approach, particularly when confronted with a critically ill patient who requires immediate action. Despite having discussions in the literature addressing the unique characteristics of medical emergency care settings, there has been hardly any alternative structured mental model proposed to overcome those challenges.

METHODS

This paper attempts to address a conceptual mental model for emergency care that combines both analytic as well as non-analytic methods in decision making.

RESULTS

The proposed model is organized in an alphabetical mnemonic, A-H. The proposed model includes eight steps for approaching emergency cases, viz., awareness, basic supportive measures, control of potential threats, diagnostics, emergency care, follow-up, groups of particular interest, and highlights. These steps might be utilized to organize and prioritize the management of emergency patients.

DISCUSSION

Metacognition is very important to develop practicable mental models in practice. The proposed model is flexible and takes into consideration the dynamicity of emergency cases. It also combines both analytic and non-analytic skills in medical education and practice.

CONCLUSION

Combining various clinical reasoning provides better opportunity, particularly for trainees and novices, to develop their experience and learn new skills. This mental model could be also of help for seasoned practitioners in their teaching, audits, and review of emergency cases.

摘要

背景

普通医学通常采用基于分析方法的策略,运用假设演绎法。医疗急救护理和教育也一直遵循类似的方法。然而,急救护理环境的独特环境和任务复杂性对分析方法构成了挑战,尤其是在面对需要立即采取行动的重症患者时。尽管文献中已有关于医疗急救护理环境独特特征的讨论,但几乎没有提出任何替代的结构化思维模型来克服这些挑战。

方法

本文试图提出一种用于急救护理的概念性思维模型,该模型在决策过程中结合了分析方法和非分析方法。

结果

所提出的模型以字母A-H的助记法进行组织。该模型包括处理紧急情况的八个步骤,即意识、基本支持措施、控制潜在威胁、诊断、急救护理、随访、特殊关注群体和重点。这些步骤可用于组织和确定对急诊患者的管理优先级。

讨论

元认知对于在实践中开发可行的思维模型非常重要。所提出的模型具有灵活性,并考虑到了紧急情况的动态性。它还在医学教育和实践中结合了分析和非分析技能。

结论

结合各种临床推理为特别是实习生和新手提供了更好的机会来积累经验和学习新技能。这种思维模型对经验丰富的从业者在教学、审核和评估急诊病例时也可能有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/32df225ffe3b/12245_2020_274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/ff1113c5f08b/12245_2020_274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/a799d9eeb1f4/12245_2020_274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/32df225ffe3b/12245_2020_274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/ff1113c5f08b/12245_2020_274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/a799d9eeb1f4/12245_2020_274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51d5/7164351/32df225ffe3b/12245_2020_274_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How to think like an emergency care provider: a conceptual mental model for decision making in emergency care.如何像急诊护理人员一样思考:急诊护理决策的概念性思维模式
Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 16;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00274-0.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Deepening the quality of clinical reasoning and decision-making in rural hospital nursing practice.深化农村医院护理实践中临床推理与决策的质量。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2858. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
6
ED Triage Decision-Making With Mental Health Presentations: A "Think Aloud" Study.伴有心理健康问题的急诊分诊决策:一项“出声思考”研究
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Nov;41(6):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Mental model for information processing and decision-making in emergency care.紧急护理中信息处理和决策的心理模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269624. eCollection 2022.
9
An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition.临床推理的综合模型:认知和元认知的双加工理论。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):954-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01900.x.
10
Post-surgery length of stay using multi-criteria decision-making tool.使用多标准决策工具的术后住院时间
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 18;32(4):514-531. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0196. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual reality for training emergency medicine residents in emergency scenarios: usefulness of a tutorial to enhance the simulation experience.虚拟现实用于培训急诊医学住院医师应对紧急情况:一个增强模拟体验教程的实用性
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 18;7:1466866. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1466866. eCollection 2025.
2
Racial, Ethnic, and Age-Related Disparities in Sedation and Restraint Use for Older Adults in the Emergency Department.急诊科老年患者在镇静和约束使用方面的种族、民族及年龄相关差异。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
The role of information systems in emergency department decision-making-a literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
A leader's framework for decision making. A leader's framework for decision making.领导者的决策框架。领导者的决策框架。
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Nov;85(11):68-76, 149.
2
Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information.临床推理文献中的经验教训:综合推理策略有助于新手诊断医生克服误导性信息。
Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02923.x.
3
Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience.临床推理的非分析模型:经验的作用。
信息系统在急诊科决策中的作用——文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jun 20;31(7):1608-1621. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae096.
4
Decision Fatigue in Emergency Medicine: An Exploration of Its Validity.急诊医学中的决策疲劳:对其有效性的探讨。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51267. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Identification of major hemorrhage in trauma patients in the prehospital setting: diagnostic accuracy and impact on outcome.院前环境下创伤患者大出血的识别:诊断准确性及其对预后的影响。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jan 12;9(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001214. eCollection 2024.
6
Virtual Reality for Emergency Medicine Training in Medical School: Prospective, Large-Cohort Implementation Study.虚拟现实在医学院急诊医学培训中的应用:前瞻性、大样本实施研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 3;25:e43649. doi: 10.2196/43649.
7
Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Techniques as an Adjunct to Advanced Cardiac Life Support.高级和侵入性心肺复苏(CPR)技术作为高级心脏生命支持的辅助手段。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 9;11(24):7315. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247315.
8
Major challenges and barriers in clinical decision-making as perceived by emergency medical services personnel: a qualitative content analysis.紧急医疗服务人员感知到的临床决策中的主要挑战和障碍:定性内容分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00408-4.
Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02914.x. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
4
Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error?急诊医学:易出错的实践?
CJEM. 2001 Oct;3(4):271-6. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500005765.
5
Critical thinking and decisionmaking: avoiding the perils of thin-slicing.
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):720-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.030. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
6
Clinical decisionmaking: opening the black box of cognitive reasoning.临床决策:打开认知推理的黑匣子。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
7
Modelling emergency decisions: recognition-primed decision making. The literature in relation to an ophthalmic critical incident.模拟紧急决策:基于认知的决策制定。与眼科危急事件相关的文献。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1023-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01399.x.
8
Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices?给学习者两全其美的体验:临床教师是否需要谨防向新手传授模式识别方法?
Acad Med. 2006 Apr;81(4):405-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200604000-00017.
9
Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine.识别并培训急诊医学团队的非技术技能。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i80-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i80.
10
Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment.模拟医疗环境中态势感知的客观测量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i65-71. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i65.