• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高视觉障碍和严重或极重度智力残疾成年人的参与度:新干预措施的过程评估。

Improving the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a process evaluation of a new intervention.

机构信息

Royal Dutch Visio - de Brink, Groningerstraat 15, Vries, the Netherlands.

Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, department of Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, unit of special needs education and youth care, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 38, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05161-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05161-1
PMID:32299453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7164344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities (VSPID) in society and community life is important, evidence-based interventions to improve their participation are lacking. We conducted a process evaluation of the implementation of 'Care for Participation+' (CFP+), a new intervention targeting the attitudes of direct support professionals (DSPs) toward the participation of adults with VSPID, within a residential facility in the Netherlands.

METHODS

CFP+ was inspired by the Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation Approach and adapted by adopting a new definition and operationalization of the concept of participation for adults with VSPID. Following systematic training, 16 DSPs of adults with VSPID were able to apply key elements of CFP+ to explore diverse roles and activities for this population, facilitating their self-management, teaching them necessary skills for participation, and organizing support. Our process evaluation entailed an investigation of the delivered dose, reach, fidelity, and adaptation of CFP+ during and after the CFP+ intervention. We also evaluated the mechanisms of impact and context using questionnaires, assignments, documentation, interviews, and a logbook.

RESULTS

The intended dose, reach, and fidelity relating to the implementation of CFP+ were not achieved. Despite this fact, an assessment of the mechanisms of impact indicated that assignments of CFP+ were well (75%) or reasonably well (17%) understood by DSPs. CFP+ was applied by DSPs to stimulate self-management (83% of DSPs), new activities (100%), enhanced involvement in existing activities (67%) and to explore new roles (50%) for adults with VSPID. A negative contextual factor mentioned by the trainer and manager was the DSPs' lack of commitment to the training program. Another negative contextual factor mentioned by DSPs was the lack of time for implementing CFP+.

CONCLUSIONS

CFP+ provides new opportunities to improve the participation of adults with VSPID. Despite the non-optimal conditions for implementing CFP+ and the DSPs' general reluctance to apply the new intervention, some have actively used CFP+ within the residential facility. Future studies should focus on the outcomes of CFP+ regarding attitudinal changes among DSPs relating to the participation of adults with VSPID and their quality of life.

摘要

背景

虽然成年人的视力和严重或极重度智力残疾(VSPID)参与社会和社区生活很重要,但缺乏提高他们参与度的循证干预措施。我们对“参与关怀+”(CFP+)在荷兰一个住宿设施中实施的情况进行了过程评估,该干预措施针对的是直接支持专业人员(DSPs)对 VSPID 成年人参与度的态度。

方法

CFP+的灵感来自波士顿心理康复方法,并通过采用新的 VSPID 成年人参与度的定义和操作化进行了调整。在系统培训后,16 名 VSPID 成年人的 DSP 能够应用 CFP+的关键要素,为该人群探索各种角色和活动,促进他们的自我管理,教授他们参与所需的技能,并组织支持。我们的过程评估涉及调查 CFP+在干预期间和之后的交付剂量、覆盖范围、保真度和适应性。我们还使用问卷、作业、文件、访谈和日志评估了影响和背景的机制。

结果

CFP+的实施剂量、覆盖范围和保真度均未达到预期。尽管如此,对影响机制的评估表明,DSPs 对 CFP+的作业理解得很好(75%)或合理(17%)。DSPs 应用 CFP+来激发自我管理(83%的 DSPs)、新活动(100%)、增强对现有活动的参与度(67%)和探索 VSPID 成年人的新角色(50%)。培训师和经理提到的一个负面背景因素是 DSPs 对培训计划缺乏承诺。另一个 DSPs 提到的负面背景因素是缺乏实施 CFP+的时间。

结论

CFP+为提高 VSPID 成年人的参与度提供了新的机会。尽管实施 CFP+的条件并不理想,而且 DSPs 普遍不愿意应用新的干预措施,但一些人在住宿设施中积极使用了 CFP+。未来的研究应侧重于 CFP+对 DSPs 与 VSPID 成年人参与度相关的态度变化及其生活质量的影响结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01cd/7164344/8ba72f268977/12913_2020_5161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01cd/7164344/8ba72f268977/12913_2020_5161_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01cd/7164344/8ba72f268977/12913_2020_5161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a process evaluation of a new intervention.提高视觉障碍和严重或极重度智力残疾成年人的参与度:新干预措施的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05161-1.
2
Intervention effects on professionals' attitudes towards the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities.干预对专业人员对成年视障和严重或极重度智力残疾人士参与态度的影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):129-139. doi: 10.1111/jar.12792. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: Definition and operationalization.视力及重度或极重度智力残疾成年人的参与:定义与实施方法
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Feb;61:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: Analysis of individual support plans.成人视障与严重或极重度智力障碍者的参与:个别支持计划分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Implementation of a program to support direct support professionals to promote a healthy lifestyle for people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities.实施一项支持直接支持专业人员的计划,以促进中重度智力残疾人士的健康生活方式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07389-x.
6
The efforts of direct support professionals to facilitate inclusion: the role of psychological determinants and work setting.直接支持专业人员促进融合的努力:心理决定因素和工作环境的作用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Oct;59(10):970-9. doi: 10.1111/jir.12209. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
7
Factor structure of the professional quality of life scale among direct support professionals: factorial validity and scale reliability.直接支持专业人员职业生活质量量表的因素结构:因子有效性和量表信度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Sep;64(9):681-689. doi: 10.1111/jir.12766. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Assessing the Usability and Feasibility of Digital Assistant Tools for Direct Support Professionals: Participatory Design and Pilot-Testing.评估面向直接支持专业人员的数字助理工具的可用性和可行性:参与式设计与试点测试。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 25;11:e51612. doi: 10.2196/51612.
9
Staffs' documentation of participation for adults with profound intellectual disability or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.工作人员对重度智力残疾或重度智力和多重残疾成年人参与情况的记录。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(21):2527-2537. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1340979. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
They Care for Others, But What About Themselves? Understanding Self-Care Among DSPs' and Its Relationship to Professional Quality of Life.他们关心他人,但他们自己呢?理解 DSP 中的自我保健及其与专业生活质量的关系。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):221-240. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.221.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of contextual factors on an intervention for people with disabilities from support persons' and health personnel's perspectives: a focus group study.从支持者和卫生人员的角度看情境因素对残疾人干预措施的影响:一项焦点小组研究
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 May 1;5:1294990. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1294990. eCollection 2024.
2
Implementation of a program to support direct support professionals to promote a healthy lifestyle for people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities.实施一项支持直接支持专业人员的计划,以促进中重度智力残疾人士的健康生活方式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07389-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: Analysis of individual support plans.成人视障与严重或极重度智力障碍者的参与:个别支持计划分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Staff members and managers' views of the conditions for the participation of adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.工作人员和管理人员对重度智力和多重残疾成年人参与条件的看法。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jan;32(1):143-151. doi: 10.1111/jar.12516. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Training staff to promote self-management in people with intellectual disabilities.
Technology-Aided Spatial Cues, Instructions, and Preferred Stimulation for Supporting People With Intellectual and Visual Disabilities in Their Occupational Engagement and Mobility: Usability Study.
技术辅助空间线索、指导及首选刺激对支持智力和视力残疾者职业参与及移动性的作用:可用性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Nov 17;8(4):e33481. doi: 10.2196/33481.
4
The utility of goal attainment scaling in evaluating a structured water dance intervention for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.目标达成量表在评估针对重度智力残疾和多重残疾成年人的结构化水舞干预中的效用。
Heliyon. 2021 Aug 30;7(9):e07902. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07902. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Development and process evaluation of a motor activity program for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.一项针对重度智力残疾和多重残疾人士的运动活动项目的开发与过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06264-z.
6
Intervention effects on professionals' attitudes towards the participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities.干预对专业人员对成年视障和严重或极重度智力残疾人士参与态度的影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):129-139. doi: 10.1111/jar.12792. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
培训工作人员以促进智障人士的自我管理。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):840-850. doi: 10.1111/jar.12440. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
4
Identifying conceptualizations and theories of change embedded in interventions to facilitate community participation for people with intellectual disability: A scoping review.识别旨在促进智障人士社区参与的干预措施中所蕴含的概念化内容和变革理论:一项范围综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Mar;31(2):165-180. doi: 10.1111/jar.12390. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Staffs' documentation of participation for adults with profound intellectual disability or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.工作人员对重度智力残疾或重度智力和多重残疾成年人参与情况的记录。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(21):2527-2537. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1340979. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Participation of adults with visual and severe or profound intellectual disabilities: Definition and operationalization.视力及重度或极重度智力残疾成年人的参与:定义与实施方法
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Feb;61:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Prevalence of reported physical health problems in people with severe or profound intellectual and motor disabilities: a cross-sectional study of medical records and care plans.重度或极重度智力与运动残疾者自述身体健康问题的患病率:一项病历与护理计划的横断面研究
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Nov;60(11):1109-1118. doi: 10.1111/jir.12298. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
The impact of visual impairment on the ability to perform activities of daily living for persons with severe/profound intellectual disability.视力障碍对重度/极重度智力残疾者日常生活活动能力的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations.迈向创新决定因素的测量工具。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):501-10. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu060. Epub 2014 Jun 20.