Beijing Suicide Research and Prevention Center, Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital, Beijing, China.
WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Suicide Prevention, Beijing, China.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Apr 17;29:e114. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000244.
The 2014 World Health Organization report on global suicide identified large differences in the male-to-female ratio of suicide rates between countries: most high-income countries (HICs) report ratios of 3:1 or higher while many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) - including China and India - report ratios of less than 1.5:1. Most authors suggest that gender-based social-cultural factors lead to higher rates of suicidal behaviour among women in LMICs and, thus, to relatively high female suicide rates. We aim to test an alternative hypothesis: differences in the method and case-fatality of suicidal behaviour - not differences in the rates of suicidal behaviour - are the main determinants of higher female suicide rates in LMICs.
A prospective registry of suicide attempts treated in all 14 general hospitals in a rural county in China was established and data from the registry were integrated with population and mortality data from the same county from 2009 to 2014.
There were 160 suicides and 1010 medically-treated suicidal attempts in the county; 84% of female suicides and 58% of male suicides ingested pesticides while 73% of female attempted suicides and 72% of male attempted suicides ingested pesticides. The suicide rate (per 100 000 person-years of exposure) was 8.4 in females and 9.1 in males (M:F ratio = 1.08:1) while the incidence of 'serious suicidal acts' (i.e. those that result in death or received treatment in a hospital) was 81.5 in females and 47.7 in males (M:F ratio = 0.59:1). The case-fatality of serious suicidal acts was higher in males than in females (19 v. 10%), increased with age, was highest for violent methods (92%), intermediate for pesticide ingestion (13%) and lowest for other methods (5%).
The incidence of medically serious suicidal behaviour among females in rural China was similar to that reported in HICs, but the case-fatality was much higher, primarily because most suicidal acts involved the ingestion of pesticides, which had a higher case-fatality than methods commonly used by women in HICs. These findings do not support sociological explanations for the relatively high female suicide rate in China but, rather, suggest that gender-specific method choice and the case-fatality of different methods are more important determinants of the demographic profile of suicide rates. Further research that involves ongoing monitoring of the changing incidence, demographic profile and case-fatality of different suicidal methods in urban and rural parts of both LMICs and HICs is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
2014 年世界卫生组织(WHO)关于全球自杀问题的报告指出,各国自杀率的男女比例存在很大差异:大多数高收入国家(HICs)报告的比例为 3:1 或更高,而许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)——包括中国和印度——报告的比例不到 1.5:1。大多数作者认为,基于性别的社会文化因素导致中低收入国家女性自杀行为的比率更高,从而导致女性自杀率相对较高。我们的目的是检验一个替代假设:自杀行为的方法和病死率的差异——而不是自杀行为的差异——是导致中低收入国家女性自杀率较高的主要决定因素。
在中国一个农村县的 14 家综合医院中建立了一个自杀未遂治疗的前瞻性登记处,并将登记处的数据与该县 2009 年至 2014 年的人口和死亡率数据进行了整合。
该县有 160 例自杀和 1010 例经医学治疗的自杀未遂;84%的女性自杀者和 58%的男性自杀者服用了农药,而 73%的女性自杀未遂者和 72%的男性自杀未遂者服用了农药。女性的自杀率(每 100000 人年暴露率)为 8.4,男性为 9.1(男女比为 1.08:1),而“严重自杀行为”(即导致死亡或在医院接受治疗的行为)的发生率为女性 81.5%,男性 47.7%(男女比为 0.59:1)。严重自杀行为的病死率男性高于女性(19 比 10%),随年龄增长而增加,最高见于暴力手段(92%),其次是农药摄入(13%),最低见于其他手段(5%)。
中国农村女性严重自杀行为的发生率与高收入国家报告的发生率相似,但病死率要高得多,主要原因是大多数自杀行为涉及农药摄入,其病死率高于高收入国家女性常用的方法。这些发现不支持中国女性自杀率相对较高的社会学解释,而是表明性别特异性方法选择和不同方法的病死率是自杀率人口特征的更重要决定因素。需要对中低收入国家和高收入国家城乡地区不同自杀方法的发病率、人口特征和病死率进行持续监测的进一步研究,以证实这一假设。