School of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia.
Department of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Republic of Korea.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 Mar 29;2020:9501985. doi: 10.1155/2020/9501985. eCollection 2020.
Electromechanical delay (EMD) is the time interval between local myocyte depolarization and the onset of myofiber shortening. Previously, researchers measured EMD during sinus rhythm and ectopic pacing in normal and heart failure conditions. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports regarding EMD during another type of rhythms or arrhythmia. The goal of this study was to quantify EMD during sinus rhythm, tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation conditions. We hypothesized that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer due to isovolumetric contraction which is imprecise during arrhythmia. We used a realistic model of 3D electromechanical ventricles. During sinus rhythm, EMD was measured in the last cycle of cardiac systole under steady conditions. EMD under tachycardia and fibrillation conditions was measured during the entire simulation, resulting in multiple EMD values. We assessed EMD for the following 3 conduction velocities (CVs): 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s. The average EMD during fibrillation condition was the shortest corresponding to 53.45 ms, 55.07 ms, and 50.77 ms, for the CVs of 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s, respectively. The average EMD during tachycardia was 58.61 ms, 58.33 ms, and 52.50 ms for the three CVs. Under sinus rhythm with action potential duration restitution (APDR) slope 0.7, the average EMD was 66.35 ms, 66.41 ms, and 66.60 ms in line with the three CVs. This result supports our hypothesis that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer than that under tachyarrhythmia conditions. In conclusion, this study observed and quantified EMD under tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation conditions. This simulation study has widened our understanding of EMD in 3D ventricles under chaotic conditions.
电机械延迟(EMD)是局部心肌去极化与肌纤维缩短开始之间的时间间隔。以前,研究人员在正常和心力衰竭条件下测量了窦性节律和异位起搏时的 EMD。然而,据我们所知,尚无关于另一种节律或心律失常时 EMD 的报道。本研究的目的是量化窦性节律、心动过速和心室颤动条件下的 EMD。我们假设窦性节律下的 EMD 由于心律失常时不精确的等容收缩而较长。我们使用了一个真实的 3D 机电心室模型。在窦性节律下,在稳定条件下测量心脏收缩末期的最后一个心动周期的 EMD。在心动过速和颤动条件下,在整个模拟过程中测量 EMD,从而得到多个 EMD 值。我们评估了以下 3 种传导速度(CV)的 EMD:31cm/s、51cm/s 和 69cm/s。在 CV 分别为 31cm/s、51cm/s 和 69cm/s 时,颤动条件下的平均 EMD 最短,分别为 53.45ms、55.07ms 和 50.77ms。心动过速时的平均 EMD 分别为 58.61ms、58.33ms 和 52.50ms。在动作电位时程恢复(APDR)斜率为 0.7 的窦性节律下,平均 EMD 分别为 66.35ms、66.41ms 和 66.60ms,与这三个 CV 一致。这一结果支持我们的假设,即在窦性节律下 EMD 长于心动过速心律失常条件下的 EMD。总之,本研究观察和量化了心动过速和心室颤动条件下的 EMD。这项模拟研究拓宽了我们对 3D 心室混沌条件下 EMD 的理解。