• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在印度南部两个地区开展的关于婴儿五联疫苗(DTwP-HBV-Hib)和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗安全性的前瞻性队列研究。

A Prospective Cohort Study on the Safety of Infant Pentavalent (DTwP-HBV-Hib) and Oral Polio Vaccines in Two South Indian Districts.

机构信息

From the The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.

Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 May;39(5):389-396. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002594.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000002594
PMID:32301918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7170438/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety of pentavalent (DTwP-HBV-Hib) vaccine has been a public concern in India and other countries. This study attempted to document the association of serious adverse events following immunization (AEFI, including hospitalizations and deaths of all causes) with the 3 doses of pentavalent and oral poliovirus (OPV) vaccines.

METHODS

A cohort of 30,688 infants in 2 south Indian districts were enrolled and followed-up between October 2014 and May 2016, following their first vaccination with DTwP-HBV-Hib and OPV at public health facilities. During weekly follow-ups, by telephone or home visits, the serious AEFIs (hospitalizations and deaths) occurring any time after each vaccination until 4 weeks after third dose were documented. The incidence risk ratios (IRRs) of serious AEFIs in the first (days 0-6) and fourth weeks (days 21-27) after the vaccine doses were compared using the poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 30,688 infants enrolled, 30,208 received their third doses of vaccines. During the 4-week periods following each vaccination, there were 365 hospitalizations and 17 deaths. Adjusted incidence risk ratio of 3 doses combined for post-vaccination serious AEFIs during the first week compared with fourth week was 0.8 [95% confidence interval: 0.6-1.0].

CONCLUSIONS

There was no increased risk of a serious AEFIs during the first week after any of the 3 doses of pentavalent and OPV vaccination compared with the fourth week. In the absence of any temporal clustering, mortality and hospitalization rates observed in vaccinated infants probably reflects the natural occurrence of such events.

摘要

背景

五价疫苗(DTwP-HBV-Hib)在印度和其他国家的安全性一直是公众关注的问题。本研究试图记录五价疫苗和口服脊髓灰质炎(OPV)疫苗接种后严重不良事件(AEFI,包括所有原因的住院和死亡)与 3 剂接种的关联。

方法

2014 年 10 月至 2016 年 5 月期间,在南印度的 2 个地区招募了 30688 名婴儿,在公共卫生机构接种 DTwP-HBV-Hib 和 OPV 后进行了随访。在每周的随访中,通过电话或家访,记录每次接种后任何时间至第 3 剂后 4 周内发生的严重 AEFI(住院和死亡)。使用泊松回归分析比较疫苗接种后第 1 天(第 0-6 天)和第 4 周(第 21-27 天)严重 AEFI 的发病率风险比(IRR)。

结果

在 30688 名入组的婴儿中,30208 名婴儿接受了第 3 剂疫苗。在每次接种后的 4 周内,有 365 名婴儿住院,17 名婴儿死亡。与第 4 周相比,第 1 周接种 3 剂疫苗后严重 AEFI 的调整后发病率风险比为 0.8(95%置信区间:0.6-1.0)。

结论

与第 4 周相比,在接种 3 剂五价疫苗和 OPV 疫苗后的第 1 周,AEFI 没有增加的风险。在没有任何时间聚集的情况下,接种婴儿中观察到的死亡率和住院率可能反映了此类事件的自然发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/12b93872b365/inf-39-389-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/2b6a899eec22/inf-39-389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/a3c4a4e2ea57/inf-39-389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/12b93872b365/inf-39-389-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/2b6a899eec22/inf-39-389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/a3c4a4e2ea57/inf-39-389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9079/7170438/12b93872b365/inf-39-389-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Prospective Cohort Study on the Safety of Infant Pentavalent (DTwP-HBV-Hib) and Oral Polio Vaccines in Two South Indian Districts.一项在印度南部两个地区开展的关于婴儿五联疫苗(DTwP-HBV-Hib)和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗安全性的前瞻性队列研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 May;39(5):389-396. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002594.
2
A prospective, observational, multi-center, post-marketing safety surveillance study of the GSK combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, and type b invasive infections (DTaP-IPV/Hib) in South Korean infants.一项针对韩国婴儿的葛兰素史克联合疫苗(预防白喉、破伤风、百日咳、脊髓灰质炎和乙型侵袭性感染)的前瞻性、观察性、多中心、上市后安全性监测研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2406060. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2406060. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Immunogenicity and safety following primary and booster vaccination with a hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine: a randomized trial in the United States.初免和加强接种六价白喉、破伤风、无细胞百日咳、乙型肝炎、灭活脊髓灰质炎和流感嗜血杆菌 b 型疫苗后的免疫原性和安全性:美国的一项随机试验。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(4):809-821. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1549449. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
A randomized, dose-ranging assessment of the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Hemophilus influenzae type b (DTPw-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine vs. co-administration of DTPw-HBV/Hib and IPV vaccines in 12 to 24 months old Filipino toddlers.一项评估联合疫苗(白喉-破伤风-全细胞百日咳-乙型肝炎-灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒-流感嗜血杆菌 b 型,DTPw-HBV-IPV/Hib)加强剂量免疫原性和安全性的随机、剂量范围研究,与在 12 至 24 个月大的菲律宾幼儿中同时接种 DTPw-HBV/Hib 和 IPV 疫苗进行比较。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 Mar;8(3):347-54. doi: 10.4161/hv.18630. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
5
Safety and reactogenicity of a novel DTPa-HBV-IPV combined vaccine given along with commercial Hib vaccines in comparison with separate concomitant administration of DTPa, Hib, and OPV vaccines in infants.与在婴儿中分别同时接种白喉、破伤风、百日咳、乙肝、脊髓灰质炎联合疫苗(DTPa-HBV-IPV)、b型流感嗜血杆菌结合疫苗(Hib)相比,新型DTPa-HBV-IPV联合疫苗与市售Hib疫苗同时接种的安全性和反应原性。
Pediatrics. 2002 Apr;109(4):e58. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.e58.
6
Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio (DTPa-HBV-IPV) vaccine, mixed with the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine and administered as a single injection, with the DTPa-IPV/Hib and hepatitis B vaccines administered in two simultaneous injections to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.将白喉、破伤风、无细胞百日咳、乙型肝炎、灭活脊髓灰质炎联合疫苗(DTPa-HBV-IPV)与b型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)结合疫苗混合并作为单次注射给2、4和6月龄婴儿,与将DTPa-IPV/Hib和乙型肝炎疫苗同时分两次注射给这些婴儿的反应原性和免疫原性比较。
Vaccine. 2003 Sep 8;21(25-26):3593-600. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00420-1.
7
Immunogenicity and safety of 3-dose primary vaccination with combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib in Indian infants.印度婴儿接种三剂联合白喉破伤风百日咳-乙肝-脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗/ Hib疫苗的免疫原性和安全性
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jan 2;13(1):120-127. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1225639. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Immunization of preterm infants with GSK's hexavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine: A review of safety and immunogenicity.GSK 六价联合疫苗(白喉-破伤风无细胞百日咳-乙型肝炎-灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒-流感嗜血杆菌 b 型 conjugate vaccine)在早产儿中的免疫接种:安全性和免疫原性综述。
Vaccine. 2018 Feb 8;36(7):986-996. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Immunogenicity and safety of primary and booster vaccination with 2 investigational formulations of diphtheria, tetanus and Haemophilus influenzae type b antigens in a hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib combination vaccine in comparison with the licensed Infanrix hexa.与已获许可的六联疫苗(Infanrix hexa)相比,六价白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳-乙肝-脊髓灰质炎- b型流感嗜血杆菌联合疫苗(DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib)中两种研究用白喉、破伤风和b型流感嗜血杆菌抗原制剂进行初次和加强免疫接种的免疫原性和安全性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jul 3;13(7):1505-1515. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1294294. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Safety profile of - 17 years of GSK's passive post-marketing surveillance.葛兰素史克17年被动上市后监测的安全性概况。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2020 Aug;19(8):771-779. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1800458. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a Multicenter Active Adverse Events Following Immunization Sentinel Surveillance Network Across 22 Tertiary Care Hospitals in India: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.在印度22家三级护理医院建立免疫接种后多中心主动不良事件哨点监测网络:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 8;14:e64050. doi: 10.2196/64050.
2
Minimum Data Set and Metadata for Active Vaccine Safety Surveillance: Systematic Review.主动疫苗安全性监测的最小数据集和元数据:系统评价
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 17;11:e63161. doi: 10.2196/63161.
3
Adverse Events Following Immunization Among Children Under Two Years of Age: A Prospective Observational Study From North India.

本文引用的文献

1
Measles outbreaks in Italy: A paradigm of the re-emergence of vaccine-preventable diseases in developed countries.意大利麻疹疫情:发达国家疫苗可预防疾病再现的范例。
Prev Med. 2019 Apr;121:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Pediatric Appropriate Evaluation Protocol for India (PAEP-India): Tool for Assessing Appropriateness of Pediatric Hospitalization.印度儿科适宜性评估方案(PAEP-印度):评估儿科住院适宜性的工具
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Dec 15;55(12):1041-1045.
3
Outbreaks of the measles in the Dutch Bible Belt and in other places - New prospects for a 1000 year old virus.
两岁以下儿童免疫接种后的不良事件:一项来自印度北部的前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 30;15(4):e38356. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38356. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Adverse Events Following Immunization- The Known Unknowns and Black Box : Based on 10th Dr. I. C. Verma Excellence Award for Young Pediatricians Delivered as Oration on 9th Oct. 2022.预防接种后的不良反应——已知的未知和黑箱:基于第十届 I.C. Verma 博士青年儿科医生卓越奖的演讲,于 2022 年 10 月 9 日发表。
Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;90(8):817-825. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04555-3. Epub 2023 May 26.
荷兰《圣经》地带及其他地区的麻疹疫情——一种有着千年历史病毒的新情况
Biosystems. 2019 Mar;177:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Public Health Consequences of a 2013 Measles Outbreak in New York City.2013 年纽约市麻疹爆发的公共卫生后果。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 1;172(9):811-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1024.
5
Resurgence risk for measles, mumps and rubella in France in 2018 and 2020.2018 年和 2020 年法国麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹的再现风险。
Euro Surveill. 2018 Jun;23(25). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.25.1700796.
6
Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study.一国之内的差异:1990-2016 年印度各邦的疾病流行转变的流行病学差异,全球疾病负担研究。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2437-2460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Mortality from tetanus between 1990 and 2015: findings from the global burden of disease study 2015.1990年至2015年期间破伤风导致的死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的结果
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4111-4.
8
The risk of intussusception following monovalent rotavirus vaccination in England: A self-controlled case-series evaluation Ref. No: JVAC-D-16-01124.英格兰单价轮状病毒疫苗接种后肠套叠的风险:一项自我对照病例系列评估 参考文献编号:JVAC-D-16-01124
Vaccine. 2016 Dec 7;34(50):6115. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.014.
9
The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey.2016 年疫苗信心状况:67 个国家调查的全球观点。
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
10
Enhancing vaccine safety capacity globally: A lifecycle perspective.从生命周期角度提升全球疫苗安全能力。
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33 Suppl 4(0 4):D46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.073. Epub 2015 Oct 1.