Suppr超能文献

最小化与农业生态系统中捕食管理相关的动物福利损害。

Minimizing animal welfare harms associated with predation management in agro-ecosystems.

机构信息

Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.

Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, 6034, South Africa.

出版信息

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Aug;95(4):1097-1108. doi: 10.1111/brv.12601. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

Abstract

The impacts of wild predators on livestock are a common source of human-wildlife conflict globally, and predators are subject to population control for this reason in many situations. Animal welfare is one of many important considerations affecting decisions about predation management. Recent studies discussing animal welfare in this context have presented arguments emphasizing the importance of avoiding intentional harm to predators, but they have not usually considered harms imposed by predators on livestock and other animals. Efforts to mitigate predation impacts (including 'no control' approaches) cause a variety of harms to predators, livestock and other wildlife. Successfully minimizing the overall frequency and magnitude of harms requires consideration of the direct, indirect, intentional and unintentional harms imposed on all animals inhabiting agricultural landscapes. We review the harms resulting from the management of dingoes and other wild dogs in the extensive beef cattle grazing systems of Australia to illustrate how these negative impacts can be minimized across both wild and domestic species present on a farm or in a free-ranging livestock grazing context. Similar to many other predator-livestock conflicts, wild dogs impose intermittent harms on beef cattle (especially calves) including fatal predation, non-fatal attack (mauling and biting), pathogen transmission, and fear- or stress-related effects. Wild dog control tools and strategies impose harms on dingoes and other wildlife including stress, pain and death as a consequence of both lethal and non-lethal control approaches. To balance these various sources of harm, we argue that the tactical use of lethal predator control approaches can result in harming the least number of individual animals, given certain conditions. This conclusion conflicts with both traditional (e.g. continuous or ongoing lethal control) and contemporary (e.g. predator-friendly or no-control) predation management approaches. The general and transferable issues, approaches and principles we describe have broad applicability to many other human-wildlife conflicts around the world.

摘要

野生动物捕食家畜对全球的人兽冲突来说是一个常见的根源,出于这个原因,在许多情况下,捕食者都需要进行种群控制。动物福利是影响捕食管理决策的众多重要考虑因素之一。最近在这方面讨论动物福利的研究提出了一些论点,强调了避免故意伤害捕食者的重要性,但这些研究通常没有考虑捕食者对家畜和其他动物造成的伤害。减轻捕食影响的努力(包括“无控制”方法)会给捕食者、家畜和其他野生动物带来各种伤害。成功地将总体伤害的频率和程度降到最低需要考虑到所有栖息在农业景观中的动物所遭受的直接、间接、故意和非故意的伤害。我们回顾了在澳大利亚广泛的肉牛放牧系统中管理野狗和其他野生犬科动物所产生的危害,以说明如何在农场或自由放养的牲畜放牧环境中,最大限度地减少对所有野生物种和家畜的负面影响。与许多其他的捕食者与家畜冲突类似,野狗会间歇性地对肉牛(尤其是小牛)造成危害,包括致命捕食、非致命攻击(咬伤和咬伤)、病原体传播以及与恐惧或压力相关的影响。野狗控制工具和策略会对野狗和其他野生动物造成伤害,包括因致死和非致死控制方法而导致的压力、疼痛和死亡。为了平衡这些各种来源的伤害,我们认为,在某些条件下,战术性地使用致命的捕食者控制方法可以最大限度地减少对个体动物的伤害。这一结论与传统(例如持续或持续的致命控制)和当代(例如对捕食者友好或无控制)的捕食管理方法相冲突。我们描述的一般和可转移的问题、方法和原则对世界各地的许多其他人与野生动物冲突具有广泛的适用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验