• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术的真正益处的系统评价:人机工程学。

A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2113. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2113
PMID:32304167
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ergonomics, as defined by the optimization of one's physical environment to enhance work performance, is an important consideration in surgery. While there have been reviews on the ergonomics of laparoscopy, this has not been the case for robotic surgery despite the rising number of publications.

METHODS

This study was performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was performed on main databases to identify relevant articles.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles were included, comprising 3074 participants. Studies employing objective measurement tools showed that robotics conferred superior ergonomic benefits and reduced work load compared to laparoscopy, for both surgeons and trainees. Survey studies also demonstrated that self-reported discomfort was lower in robotic procedures compared to laparoscopy and open surgery. Compared to other subspecialities, gynecological procedures seem to be associated with greater surgeon-reported strain.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is ergonomically superior to open and laparoscopic surgery. However, rates of physical strain remain significant and should be addressed by formal ergonomic training and adequate console familiarization.

摘要

背景

人体工程学是通过优化物理环境来提高工作表现,这在外科手术中是一个重要的考虑因素。虽然已经有关于腹腔镜手术人体工程学的综述,但机器人手术却没有,尽管相关出版物的数量在不断增加。

方法

本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。在主要数据库中进行了检索,以确定相关文章。

结果

共纳入 29 篇文章,包括 3074 名参与者。使用客观测量工具的研究表明,与腹腔镜相比,机器人手术为外科医生和学员提供了更好的人体工程学效益,并减轻了工作负荷。调查研究还表明,与腹腔镜和开放手术相比,机器人手术中自我报告的不适程度较低。与其他亚专业相比,妇科手术似乎与外科医生报告的更大压力有关。

结论

机器人手术在人体工程学方面优于开放手术和腹腔镜手术。然而,身体疲劳的发生率仍然很高,应通过正式的人体工程学培训和充分的控制台熟悉程度来解决。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics.机器人手术的真正益处的系统评价:人机工程学。
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2113. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.减重外科医生工效学:腹腔镜与机器人的比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:864-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.045. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.腹腔镜与机器人手术的人机工程学风险比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8397-8402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09105-0. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
4
Impact of preferred surgical modality on surgeon wellness: a survey of workload, physical pain/discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders.手术方式偏好对外科医生健康的影响:一项关于工作量、身体疼痛/不适和神经肌肉骨骼疾病的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9244-9254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10485-0. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术相关的身体和认知工效学的比较评估
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):456-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
6
Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.常规腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中的人机工程学比较研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;24(12):3840. doi: 10.3390/s24123840.
7
Surgeons' physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study.机器人手术中外科医生的身体不适与症状:一项全面的人体工程学调查研究
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1697-1706. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5160-y. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
8
An ergonomic comfort workspace analysis of master manipulator for robotic laparoscopic surgery with motion scaled teleoperation system.机器人腹腔镜手术中运动缩放遥操作系统的主操作器的人体工程学舒适工作空间分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Dec;18(6):e2448. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2448. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
Who is hurting? A prospective study of surgeon ergonomics.谁在受伤?一项关于外科医生工效学的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):292-299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08274-0. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Ergonomic Robotic Console Configuration in Gynecologic Surgery: An Interventional Study.妇科手术中的人机工程学机器人控制台配置:一项干预性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):850-859. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer surgical and oncological outcomes.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的手术及肿瘤学结局。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 13;12:1628649. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1628649. eCollection 2025.
2
Training the trainees in robotic surgery - a pilot scheme in the United Kingdom.在英国开展的一项试点计划——对实习医生进行机器人手术培训。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07749-9.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection: comparative short-term outcomes in a propensity score matched cohort.
机器人手术与腹腔镜前切除术:倾向评分匹配队列中的短期疗效比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 31;19(1):439. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02619-4.
4
Objective Assessment of Ergonomics and Performance of Thoracic Surgeons During Real-Life Anatomical Robotic Pulmonary Resections.现实生活中解剖学机器人辅助肺切除术中胸外科医生的人体工程学与操作表现的客观评估
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Aug 5;40(8). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf180.
5
SAGES tool for assessing robotic surgery systems (STARSS).用于评估机器人手术系统的SAGES工具(STARSS)。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11897-w.
6
Safety with the senhance™ robotic system in 3,239 patients across various surgical disciplines.senhance™机器人系统在3239例不同外科领域患者中的安全性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jul 9;410(1):218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03772-y.
7
Can robotic assistance mitigate the negative impact of sleep deprivation on surgical performance in microsurgical tasks?机器人辅助能否减轻睡眠剥夺对显微外科手术操作中手术表现的负面影响?
JPRAS Open. 2025 May 30;45:176-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.05.008. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.人工智能在整形与重建外科中的变革性作用:挑战与机遇
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2698. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082698.
9
Evaluation of the Toumai robotic system in partial nephrectomy and key system features.图迈机器人系统在肾部分切除术中的评估及关键系统特征
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97124-x.
10
Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.用于改善柔性机器人内窥镜检查人体工程学的新型用户控制设备的设计与评估
Front Robot AI. 2025 Mar 24;12:1559574. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574. eCollection 2025.