Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mol Pain. 2020 Jan-Dec;16:1744806920918692. doi: 10.1177/1744806920918692.
A large body of animal and human laboratory research has linked social interaction and support to pain perception, with a possible role for the neuropeptide oxytocin as a neuroendocrine mediator. However so far, it has been unclear whether these effects translate to ecologically valid everyday life behavior and pain perception. In a randomized placebo-controlled study, a standard suction blister skin wound was induced to N = 80 romantic couples (N = 160 individuals). Couples then received intranasal oxytocin or placebo twice daily and were either instructed to perform a positive social interaction (partner appraisal task, PAT) once in the laboratory and two times during the following five days, or not. During these days, all participants reported their subjective pain levels multiple times a day using ecologically momentary assessment. Results from hierarchical linear modeling suggest that pain levels within the couples were inter-related. In men, but not in women, oxytocin reduced pain levels. Women reported lower pain levels in the group of positive social interaction, while this effect did not show in men. These results suggest that intranasal oxytocin might have sex-specific effects with pain reducing effects in men but the opposite effects in women. In contrast, especially women benefit from positive interaction in terms of dampened pain levels after positive interaction. The results add to the evidence for health-beneficial effects of positive couple interaction and point to underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms in everyday life pain specifically. The sex-specific effects, in particular, may have implications for psychopharmacological treatment of pain in men and women.
大量的动物和人类实验室研究将社会互动和支持与疼痛感知联系起来,神经肽催产素可能作为神经内分泌介质发挥作用。然而,到目前为止,还不清楚这些影响是否转化为生态有效的日常生活行为和疼痛感知。在一项随机安慰剂对照研究中,对 N = 80 对浪漫伴侣(N = 160 人)进行了标准的吸疱皮肤伤口诱导。然后,伴侣每天接受两次鼻内催产素或安慰剂,并接受以下两种指令之一:在实验室进行一次积极的社会互动(伴侣评估任务,PAT),或在接下来的五天内进行两次;或不进行。在这些天里,所有参与者使用生态瞬间评估多次报告他们的主观疼痛水平。分层线性建模的结果表明,夫妻内的疼痛水平相互关联。在男性中,但不是在女性中,催产素降低了疼痛水平。女性在积极的社会互动组中报告的疼痛水平较低,而男性则没有这种影响。这些结果表明,鼻内催产素可能对男性有特定的性别影响,可降低疼痛,但对女性则相反。相比之下,尤其是女性在积极的互动后,疼痛水平会降低,这从积极的互动中受益。这些结果增加了积极的伴侣互动对健康有益的证据,并特别指出了日常生活中疼痛的潜在神经内分泌机制。特别是,这些性别特定的影响可能对男性和女性的疼痛的精神药理学治疗有影响。