Suppr超能文献

超重和肥胖青少年体重管理的行为干预:基于动机的教育项目与传统饮食咨询的比较

Behavioral Interventions for Weight Management in Overweight and Obese Adolescents: A Comparison Between a Motivation-based Educational Program and Conventional Dietary Counseling.

作者信息

Amiri Parisa, Jalali-Farahani Sara, Zarkesh Maryam, Gharibzadeh Safoora, Hedayati Mehdi, Azizi Fereidoun

机构信息

Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Cellular and Molecular Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Feb 1;18(1):e88192. doi: 10.5812/ijem.88192. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effects of a three-month motivation-based educational program and conventional dietary counseling on body composition and relevant outcomes among overweight and Obese adolescents.

METHODS

A total of 115 overweight and obese adolescents (46% boys) were randomly assigned to either a motivation-based program or a conventional dietary counseling. The assessments were conducted at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention.

RESULTS

Mean age and body mass index (BMI) Z-score were 14.5 ± 1.2 and 2.42 ± 0.62, respectively. Considering time trend analysis, the two groups achieved significant improvements in BMI Z-score, wrist and waist circumferences, body composition indices, and HRQoL total scores after a one-year follow-up. Wrist circumference and the HRQoL reported by parents revealed significant differences between the study groups in favor of the motivation-based program.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both programs could improve anthropometric indices and HRQoL over time, the motivation-based program was more effective in reducing adolescents' wrist circumference and improving HRQoL, as the parents reported.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较为期三个月的基于动机的教育项目和传统饮食咨询对超重及肥胖青少年身体成分及相关结果的影响。

方法

总共115名超重及肥胖青少年(46%为男孩)被随机分配到基于动机的项目组或传统饮食咨询组。在基线期以及干预后的3个月、6个月和12个月进行评估。

结果

平均年龄和体重指数(BMI)Z评分分别为14.5±1.2和2.42±0.62。考虑时间趋势分析,两组在一年随访后,BMI Z评分、手腕和腰围、身体成分指数以及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)总分均有显著改善。手腕周长以及家长报告的HRQoL显示,研究组之间存在显著差异,基于动机的项目组更具优势。

结论

尽管随着时间推移,两个项目均可改善人体测量指标和HRQoL,但正如家长所报告的,基于动机的项目在减少青少年手腕周长和改善HRQoL方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae5/7144245/f11f34a6244a/ijem-18-1-88192-i001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验