• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对时间依赖性暴露的倾向评分分析。

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure.

作者信息

Zhang Zhongheng, Li Xiuyang, Wu Xiao, Qiu Huixian, Shi Hongying

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(5):246. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.33.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2020.01.33
PMID:32309393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7154493/
Abstract

Propensity score analysis (PSA) is widely used in medical literature to account for confounders. Conventionally, the propensity score (PS) is calculated by a binary logistic regression model using time-fixed covariates. In the presence of time-varying treatment or exposure, the conventional method may cause bias because subjects with early and late exposure are treated as the same. In effect, subjects who are treated latter can be different from those who are treated early. Thus, the conventional PSA must be modified to address this bias. In this paper, we illustrate how to perform analysis in the presence of time-dependent exposure. We conduct a simulation study with a known treatment effect. In the simulation study, we find the PSA method that directly adjust PS estimated by either a binary logistic regression model or a Cox regression model using time-fixed covariates still introduce significant bias. On the other hand, the time-dependent PS matching can help to achieve a result approaching the true effect. After time-dependent PS matching, the matched cohort can be analyzed with conventional Cox regression model or conditional logistic regression (CLR) model with time strata. The performance is comparable to the correctly specified Cox regression model with time-varying covariates (i.e., adjusting the exposure in a multivariable model as a time-varying covariate). We further develop a function called for time-dependent PS matching and it is applied to a real world dataset.

摘要

倾向得分分析(PSA)在医学文献中被广泛用于处理混杂因素。传统上,倾向得分(PS)是通过使用时间固定协变量的二元逻辑回归模型计算得出的。在存在随时间变化的治疗或暴露的情况下,传统方法可能会导致偏差,因为早期和晚期暴露的受试者被视为相同。实际上,后期接受治疗的受试者可能与早期接受治疗的受试者不同。因此,必须对传统的PSA进行修改以解决这种偏差。在本文中,我们说明了如何在存在时间依赖性暴露的情况下进行分析。我们进行了一项具有已知治疗效果的模拟研究。在模拟研究中,我们发现使用时间固定协变量通过二元逻辑回归模型或Cox回归模型直接调整估计的PS的PSA方法仍然会引入显著偏差。另一方面,时间依赖性PS匹配有助于获得接近真实效果的结果。在进行时间依赖性PS匹配后,可以使用传统的Cox回归模型或带有时间分层的条件逻辑回归(CLR)模型对匹配队列进行分析。其性能与正确设定的带有时间变化协变量的Cox回归模型相当(即,在多变量模型中将暴露作为时间变化协变量进行调整)。我们进一步开发了一个用于时间依赖性PS匹配的函数,并将其应用于一个真实世界的数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffb/7154493/bb0c6d2984e7/atm-08-05-246-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffb/7154493/5951a9c962d3/atm-08-05-246-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffb/7154493/bb0c6d2984e7/atm-08-05-246-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffb/7154493/5951a9c962d3/atm-08-05-246-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ffb/7154493/bb0c6d2984e7/atm-08-05-246-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure.对时间依赖性暴露的倾向评分分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(5):246. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.33.
2
On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies.关于混杂因素标量分数在观察性研究设计与分析中的使用及误用
Stat Med. 2015 Aug 15;34(18):2618-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.6467. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Propensity score method: a non-parametric technique to reduce model dependence.倾向评分法:一种减少模型依赖性的非参数技术。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jan;5(1):7. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.57.
4
Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.在使用倾向得分进行协变量调整来估计治疗效果时,倾向得分模型的拟合优度诊断。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.1673.
5
Time-dependent propensity score for assessing the effect of vaccine exposure on pregnancy outcomes through pregnancy exposure cohort studies.通过妊娠暴露队列研究评估疫苗暴露对妊娠结局影响的时间依赖性倾向评分。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Mar 12;11(3):3074-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110303074.
6
Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.通过倾向得分方法控制混杂因素可能会导致条件AUC的估计出现偏差:一项模拟研究。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):568-582. doi: 10.1002/pst.1948. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Misuse of Regression Adjustment for Additional Confounders Following Insufficient Propensity Score Balancing.在倾向评分匹配不足的情况下,对额外混杂因素进行回归调整的误用。
Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):541-548. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001023.
8
Advanced Statistics: Multiple Logistic Regression, Cox Proportional Hazards, and Propensity Scores.高级统计学:多变量逻辑回归、Cox 比例风险和倾向评分。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;22(6):604-610. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.425.
9
Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods.使用多变量Cox比例风险回归和倾向评分方法进行调整后比较治疗效果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.1520.
10
Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.存在多种混杂因素时,疾病风险评分、倾向评分和传统多变量结局回归的表现。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):613-20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr143. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Bisphosphonates and the risk of dementia in patients with osteoporosis or fragility fracture: A population-based study in Hong Kong.双膦酸盐与骨质疏松症或脆性骨折患者的痴呆风险:一项基于香港人群的研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70503. doi: 10.1002/alz.70503.
2
Morbidity and Mortality of Hospital-Onset SARS-CoV-2 Infections Due to Omicron Versus Prior Variants : A Propensity-Matched Analysis.奥密克戎变异株与既往变异株导致的医院获得性 SARS-CoV-2 感染的发病率和死亡率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug;177(8):1078-1088. doi: 10.7326/M24-0199. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Changes in Glomerular Filtration Rate After Switching From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary artery lesion risk and mediating mechanism in children with complete and incomplete Kawasaki disease.川崎病完全和不完全患儿冠状动脉损伤风险及中介机制。
J Investig Med. 2019 Aug;67(6):950-956. doi: 10.1136/jim-2018-000898. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Propensity score method: a non-parametric technique to reduce model dependence.倾向评分法:一种减少模型依赖性的非参数技术。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jan;5(1):7. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.57.
3
Association Between Tracheal Intubation During Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival.
从富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯转换为富马酸替诺福韦艾拉酚胺用于人类免疫缺陷病毒暴露前预防后肾小球滤过率的变化
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 29;11(2):ofad695. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad695. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Mathematical Modeling of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths and the Impact of Vaccinations during Three Years of the Pandemic in Peru.秘鲁大流行三年期间新冠病例和死亡的数学建模以及疫苗接种的影响
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Oct 27;11(11):1648. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11111648.
5
Smartphone-Based Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Retrospective Cohort Study of Secondary Care Use and Costs.基于智能手机的射血分数降低的心力衰竭远程监测:二级医疗使用和成本的回顾性队列研究
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Jun 23;7:e45611. doi: 10.2196/45611.
6
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: time-dependent propensity score-sequential matching analysis from a nationwide population-based registry.体外心肺复苏治疗成人院外心脏骤停患者:来自全国基于人群登记的时间依赖性倾向评分序贯匹配分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 6;27(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04384-y.
7
The Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.碳酸氢钠林格氏液在危重症患者中的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 30;13:829394. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.829394. eCollection 2022.
8
Confounding adjustment methods in longitudinal observational data with a time-varying treatment: a mapping review.具有时变治疗的纵向观察数据中的混杂调整方法:映射综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 18;12(3):e058977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058977.
9
The protective role of statins in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective observational study.他汀类药物在新冠肺炎患者中的保护作用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Transl Med Commun. 2021;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41231-021-00102-4. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Propensity score matching with R: conventional methods and new features.使用R进行倾向得分匹配:传统方法与新特性
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(9):812. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3998.
成人院内心脏骤停期间气管插管与生存之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):494-506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20165.
4
Early administration of epinephrine (adrenaline) in patients with cardiac arrest with initial shockable rhythm in hospital: propensity score matched analysis.在医院中对初始可电击心律的心脏骤停患者早期给予肾上腺素(副肾素):倾向评分匹配分析
BMJ. 2016 Apr 6;353:i1577. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1577.
5
Time-dependent propensity score for assessing the effect of vaccine exposure on pregnancy outcomes through pregnancy exposure cohort studies.通过妊娠暴露队列研究评估疫苗暴露对妊娠结局影响的时间依赖性倾向评分。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Mar 12;11(3):3074-85. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110303074.
6
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates.生成生存时间以模拟具有时变协变量的 Cox 比例风险模型。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3946-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5452. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
7
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.队列研究中的不朽时间偏倚问题:以他汀类药物预防糖尿病进展为例
BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5087.
9
Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.倾向得分匹配与时变协变量
Biometrics. 2005 Sep;61(3):721-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00356.x.
10
Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.生成生存时间以模拟Cox比例风险模型。
Stat Med. 2005 Jun 15;24(11):1713-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.2059.