• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开放椎弓根螺钉的拔出力——一项生物力学尸体研究

Pullout force of minimally invasive surgical and open pedicle screws-a biomechanical cadaveric study.

作者信息

Matthews Phoebe G M, Cadman Joseph, Tomka Janos, Dabirrahmani Danè, Appleyard Richard, Kam Andrew

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Biomechanics Research Group, 2 Technology Place, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):3-12. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.15.

DOI:10.21037/jss.2020.01.15
PMID:32309640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7154348/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess whether lumbar pedicle screw placement with a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) open technique imparts different biomechanical parameters and thus may affect failure rates.

METHODS

Human cadaveric disarticulated lumbar vertebrae 1-5 were stabilised in cement. Pedicle screws were inserted either via the 'MIS' or 'open' technique, based on previously described anatomical landmarks. Each vertebra had one 'MIS' and one 'open' technique screw. Specimens were tested with an Instron mechanical testing machine, positioned to allow for testing of direct coaxial force. Load was applied until failure occurred, and load-displacement curves generated for each screw.

RESULTS

Average failure load was found to be 685±399 N for MIS, versus 661±323 N for open technique (P=0.75). The average ultimate failure load was 748±421 N for MIS, versus 772±326 N for open (P=0.74). Average displacement until failure was 0.95±0.49 mm for MIS as compared to 0.95±0.62 mm for open (P=0.996). Axial stiffness was 936±217 N/mm for MIS and 1,016±263 N/mm for open (P=0.19). Average work required to result in failure was 0.84±1.09 J for MIS and 0.82±1.05 J for open (P=0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the biomechanical properties of the MIS as compared with open lumbar pedicle screws, when tested until failure under direct coaxial force. The clinical implication may be that there is no significant advantage in the biomechanical properties of MIS versus open lumbar pedicle screw insertion techniques.

摘要

背景

评估采用微创外科(MIS)开放技术置入腰椎椎弓根螺钉是否会赋予不同的生物力学参数,进而可能影响失败率。

方法

将人类第1至5节腰椎尸体离断椎体用骨水泥固定。根据先前描述的解剖标志,通过“MIS”或“开放”技术置入椎弓根螺钉。每个椎体有一枚“MIS”技术螺钉和一枚“开放”技术螺钉。用英斯特朗力学试验机对标本进行测试,将其放置成可测试直接同轴力的状态。施加负荷直至发生失效,并为每枚螺钉生成负荷-位移曲线。

结果

发现MIS技术的平均失效负荷为685±399 N,而开放技术为661±323 N(P = 0.75)。MIS技术的平均极限失效负荷为748±421 N,而开放技术为772±326 N(P = 0.74)。MIS技术直至失效的平均位移为0.95±0.49 mm,而开放技术为0.95±0.62 mm(P = 0.996)。MIS技术的轴向刚度为936±217 N/mm,开放技术为1016±263 N/mm(P = 0.19)。导致失效所需的平均功,MIS技术为0.84±1.09 J,开放技术为0.82±1.05 J(P = 0.94)。

结论

在直接同轴力作用下测试直至失效时,MIS腰椎椎弓根螺钉与开放腰椎椎弓根螺钉的生物力学性能无显著差异。临床意义可能是,MIS腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入技术与开放技术相比,在生物力学性能方面无显著优势。

相似文献

1
Pullout force of minimally invasive surgical and open pedicle screws-a biomechanical cadaveric study.微创与开放椎弓根螺钉的拔出力——一项生物力学尸体研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):3-12. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.15.
2
The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study.远端撑开机构对标准椎弓根螺钉拔出阻力影响的生物力学研究
Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.038. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
3
Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies.椎弓根螺钉置入角度与拔出强度:两种方案的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):670-6. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE09886. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
4
Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.腰椎椎弓根螺钉的皮质骨轨迹
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
5
Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.骨质疏松性腰椎的初次椎弓根螺钉强化:椎弓根固定强度的生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 1;32(10):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261566.38422.40.
6
Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.尸体脊柱中双螺纹椎弓根螺钉即刻和疲劳强度的特点。
Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):947-56. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
Pullout strength of misplaced pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae - A cadaveric study.胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入位置不当的拔出强度——一项尸体研究。
Indian J Orthop. 2013 May;47(3):238-43. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.111502.
8
Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.完全插入和退出后圆锥形和圆柱形椎弓根螺钉拔出失败的特征
Spine J. 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):408-14. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00119-x.
9
Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.标本固定方法对椎弓根螺钉拔出试验的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 1;21(9):1037-44. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009.
10
Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.用于骨质疏松性椎体椎弓根螺钉置入的Krag与尾端轨迹技术:生物力学比较与分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 15;39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000431.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedicle Screw Pull-Out Strength Between the Jamshidi Needle and Pedicle Probe Techniques in an Osteoporotic Cancellous Bone Model: A Biomechanical Study.骨质疏松性松质骨模型中Jamshidi针与椎弓根探子技术的椎弓根螺钉拔出强度:一项生物力学研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74747. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74747. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Our C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: The Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine-Based on Our Experiences.我们的无 C 臂微创脊柱手术技术:胸腰椎和腰椎——基于我们的经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2116. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122116.
3
The association between paraspinal muscle parameters and vertebral pedicle microstructure in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.接受腰椎融合手术患者的脊柱旁肌参数与椎弓根微结构之间的关联。
Int Orthop. 2023 Apr;47(4):1051-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05659-9. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Is Kummell's Disease a Misdiagnosed and/or an Underreported Complication of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? A Pattern of the Condition and Available Treatment Modalities.Kummell病是骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的误诊和/或报告不足的并发症吗?病情模式及可用治疗方式
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 11;10(12):2584. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122584.

本文引用的文献

1
Finite element method-based study of pedicle screw-bone connection in pullout test and physiological spinal loads.基于有限元法的椎弓根螺钉-骨连接在拔出试验和生理脊柱载荷中的研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2019 May;67:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?脊柱后路稳定装置的临床前评估:当前标准能否代表日常基本活动?
Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2909-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4622-1. Epub 2016 May 28.
3
Comparative analysis of international standards for the fatigue testing of posterior spinal fixation systems: the importance of preload in ISO 12189.后路脊柱内固定系统疲劳测试国际标准的对比分析:预载在ISO 12189中的重要性
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.461. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
4
Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.微创与开放后路腰椎椎间融合术/经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在临床改善、融合率及主要并发症发生率方面的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1058-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3890-5. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
5
The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study.远端撑开机构对标准椎弓根螺钉拔出阻力影响的生物力学研究
Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.038. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.椎弓根螺钉 hubbing 对胸椎拔出阻力的生物力学影响。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.骨质疏松症尸体模型中椎弓根螺钉螺纹差异设计的生物力学分析
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Mar;27(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8
Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies.椎弓根螺钉置入角度与拔出强度:两种方案的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):670-6. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE09886. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
9
Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.骨质疏松性脊柱中不同螺钉强化技术和螺钉设计的评估
Eur Spine J. 2008 Nov;17(11):1462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0769-8. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
10
Biomechanical comparison of single- and dual-lead pedicle screws in cadaveric spine.尸体脊柱中单节段与双节段椎弓根螺钉的生物力学比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jan;8(1):52-7. doi: 10.3171/SPI-08/01/052.