• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证萨尔茨堡痴呆症测试预测 (SDTP) 在英语住院医疗环境中作为认知筛查工具的有效性。

Validation of the Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP) as a Cognitive Screening Tool in an English-Speaking Inpatient Medical Setting.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Behaviour and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Newcastle Integrated Liaison Psychiatry Team, Royal Victoria Hospital, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;75(2):675-681. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200183.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-200183
PMID:32310182
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP), developed using artificial intelligence and based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), was recently introduced as a brief cognitive screening tool for cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE

In the current study, we investigated whether the STDP can be used as a valid bed-side cognitive screening tool for dementia patients, in an English-speaking, medical inpatient setting.

METHODS

216 medically ill older patients who had completed the MMSE (from which the SDTP scores can be calculated), with a subsample 58 patients who had also completed the ACE-R/ACE-III scales. Diagnosis of one of four dementia types (n = 127) and socio-demographic information were also collected. MMSE, SDTP, ACE-R/ACE-III, and dementia diagnosis were used to examine the construct validity of the SDTP through assessments of the structural, concurrent, and convergent validity.

RESULTS

The SDTP shows structural validity through demonstrating uni-dimensionality. Construct validity was demonstrated by sufficient correlation sizes with MMSE scores against a benchmark correlation size for most of the subsample, except vascular dementia. Convergent validity was demonstrated for the STDP with equivalent correlations sizes with ACE-R/ACE-III as the MMSE across all samples, though for vascular dementia the magnitude of this correlation was not as strong.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support using STDP as a brief assessment tool among patients who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body disease, and mixed dementia; however, there is some statistical variability to overall MMSE scores and correlations with the ACE-R/ACE-III among patients diagnosed with vascular dementia.

摘要

背景

萨尔茨堡痴呆症测试预测(SDTP)是一种基于人工智能的简易认知筛查工具,它以 Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)为基础,用于预测认知障碍。

目的

本研究旨在探讨 SDTP 能否作为一种有效的床边认知筛查工具,用于英语环境下的住院医疗患者,以评估其是否存在痴呆。

方法

216 名患有躯体疾病的老年患者完成了简易精神状态检查(MMSE)(可据此计算出 SDTP 评分),其中 58 名患者还完成了 ACE-R/ACE-III 量表。我们收集了患者的 MMSE、SDTP、ACE-R/ACE-III 评分和痴呆诊断结果,并基于结构效度、同时效度和收敛效度对其进行评估,以检验 SDTP 的构效关系。

结果

SDTP 显示出结构有效性,具有单一维度。通过与大多数亚组的 MMSE 基准相关性相比,SDTP 与 MMSE 之间的相关性较强,除血管性痴呆外,其余均具有足够的相关性。SDTP 与 ACE-R/ACE-III 之间的相关性与 MMSE 相似,表明具有良好的收敛效度,在所有样本中均如此,但血管性痴呆的相关性强度稍低。

结论

本研究结果支持将 SDTP 作为一种简短的评估工具,用于已确诊为阿尔茨海默病、路易体痴呆和混合性痴呆的患者;然而,对于血管性痴呆患者,SDTP 与 MMSE 总分和与 ACE-R/ACE-III 的相关性存在一定的统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP) as a Cognitive Screening Tool in an English-Speaking Inpatient Medical Setting.验证萨尔茨堡痴呆症测试预测 (SDTP) 在英语住院医疗环境中作为认知筛查工具的有效性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;75(2):675-681. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200183.
2
Three-question dementia screening. Development of the Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP).三问题痴呆筛查。萨尔茨堡痴呆测试预测法(SDTP)的开发。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Nov;47(7):577-82. doi: 10.1007/s00391-013-0568-7.
3
Diagnostic utility of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination - III (ACE-III), Mini-ACE, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia.用于检测轻度认知障碍和痴呆的 Addenbrooke 认知测验-III(ACE-III)、Mini-ACE、简易精神状态检查、蒙特利尔认知评估和 Hasegawa 痴呆量表修订版的诊断效用。
Psychogeriatrics. 2020 Mar;20(2):156-162. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12480. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Preliminary study of the reliability and validity of the Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam (Chinese version) in neurological intensive care unit patients.约翰霍普金斯适应性认知测验(中文版)在神经重症监护病房患者中的信效度初步研究。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(2):137-142. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1537511. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Validation of the Cuban Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment.用于筛查轻度认知障碍的古巴版修订版Addenbrooke认知检查的验证
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(5-6):320-327. doi: 10.1159/000481345. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Suspected Dementia in Young Adults: Cognitive Screening Tools for Use in Primary Care.疑似青年期痴呆:在初级保健中使用的认知筛查工具。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(1):333-341. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215514.
7
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
8
Validation and Normative Data for the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study.改良电话认知状态测试的验证和常模数据:悉尼记忆与衰老研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2108-2115. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16033. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Validation of the Portuguese version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III in mild cognitive impairment and dementia.阿登布鲁克认知检查III葡萄牙语版本在轻度认知障碍和痴呆中的效度验证。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Jun;27(6):781-786. doi: 10.17219/acem/68975.
10
Validation of the Sinhala Version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised for the Detection of Dementia in Sri Lanka: Comparison with the Mini-Mental Status Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.验证用于斯里兰卡痴呆症检测的阿登布鲁克认知测验修订版(Sinhala 版):与简易精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估的比较。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):198-208. doi: 10.1159/000497743. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The current state of artificial intelligence-augmented digitized neurocognitive screening test.人工智能增强数字化神经认知筛查测试的当前状态
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Mar 30;17:1133632. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1133632. eCollection 2023.