• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在阿尔巴尼亚推行性别友好型烟草控制政策的理由。

The case for gender considerate tobacco control policies in Albania.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK Canada.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Apr 14;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00143-6. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-020-00143-6
PMID:32313841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7155310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco use is a serious health concern in Albania. While the prevalence of tobacco smoking has traditionally been higher for men, the increasing prevalence of smoking for women is becoming a concern. The 2007 Tobacco Control policy mandated smoke-free indoor spaces, banned various forms of tobacco advertising, required written health warnings on packaging and levied excise taxes on cigarette sales. Since smoking behavior varies among different demographic groups, each group's response to a uniform policy will differ, blunting the effectiveness of these efforts as a result. This study examines various socioeconomic, demographic and behavioral factors affecting both the likelihood and frequency of smoking in Albanian households in order to provide insights on targeting various populations more effectively.

METHODS

The study utilizes data from Albanian 2008-09 and 2017-18 Demographic and Health Surveys consisting of adults aged 15-49 years. The outcome variable includes respondents' current tobacco smoking behaviour and its frequency. The exposure variables include respondents' sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. We use a two-level random intercept model with the two-stage residual inclusion estimation method to determine the association between outcome and exposure variables. By including a time variable, we capture the change in smoking behavior during the 2009-2018 period. We also extend the analysis by assessing the differential influence of gender on the likelihood of smoking, both by income quintiles and education.

RESULTS

The results suggest that the likelihood of smoking decreased by 23% in 2017-18 compared to 2008-09, after controlling for various socioeconomic and demographic factors. Tobacco smoking is also found to be linked to alcohol consumption, with binge drinkers 59% more likely to smoke tobacco compared to moderate drinkers. We also found significant inter-quintile and inter-educational differences in smoking practices within each gender category. While the likelihood of tobacco smoking decreases with increasing wealth and educational attainment among men, the opposite (for wealth) or more involved (for educational attainment) patterns are true among women.

CONCLUSIONS

To further enhance the effectiveness of the current Tobacco Control policy, the Government of Albania should target various demographic groups (such as poor males, rich and educated females) in a differentiated fashion.

摘要

背景

烟草使用在阿尔巴尼亚是一个严重的健康问题。虽然男性吸烟的流行率历来较高,但女性吸烟的流行率不断上升令人担忧。2007 年的《烟草控制政策》规定了室内无烟区、禁止各种形式的烟草广告、要求在包装上印刷健康警示语并对香烟销售征收消费税。由于不同的人口群体吸烟行为不同,每个群体对统一政策的反应也不同,这削弱了这些努力的效果。本研究考察了影响阿尔巴尼亚家庭吸烟可能性和频率的各种社会经济、人口和行为因素,以便更有效地针对不同人群。

方法

本研究利用了来自 2008-09 年和 2017-18 年阿尔巴尼亚人口与健康调查的成年人(15-49 岁)的数据。因变量包括受访者当前的烟草吸烟行为及其频率。暴露变量包括受访者的社会人口学和生活方式特征。我们使用两层随机截距模型和两阶段残差纳入估计方法来确定结果变量与暴露变量之间的关系。通过包括时间变量,我们捕捉到了 2009-2018 年期间吸烟行为的变化。我们还通过评估性别对收入五分位数和教育程度不同的吸烟可能性的影响,扩展了分析。

结果

在控制了各种社会经济和人口因素后,结果表明,与 2008-09 年相比,2017-18 年吸烟的可能性降低了 23%。烟草吸烟也与饮酒有关,酗酒者比适度饮酒者更有可能吸烟,比例为 59%。我们还发现,在每个性别类别中,吸烟行为在收入五分位数和教育程度之间存在显著差异。虽然男性的吸烟可能性随着财富和教育程度的增加而降低,但女性的情况则相反(财富)或更为复杂(教育程度)。

结论

为了进一步提高现行烟草控制政策的有效性,阿尔巴尼亚政府应该针对不同的人口群体(如贫困男性、富有和受过教育的女性)采取有区别的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/c268498c4dd0/41256_2020_143_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/5252f05f7e5f/41256_2020_143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/da1c0b515484/41256_2020_143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/150b72f63126/41256_2020_143_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/c268498c4dd0/41256_2020_143_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/5252f05f7e5f/41256_2020_143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/da1c0b515484/41256_2020_143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/150b72f63126/41256_2020_143_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8580/7155310/c268498c4dd0/41256_2020_143_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The case for gender considerate tobacco control policies in Albania.在阿尔巴尼亚推行性别友好型烟草控制政策的理由。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Apr 14;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00143-6. eCollection 2020.
2
The impact of tobacco control policies in Albania.阿尔巴尼亚烟草控制政策的影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Dec;19(6):463-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.034652. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
3
Impact of cigarette price and tobacco control policies on youth smoking experimentation in Albania.香烟价格和烟草控制政策对阿尔巴尼亚青少年吸烟尝试的影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s38-s43. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058196.
4
Geographical Inequality in Tobacco Control in China: Multilevel Evidence From 98 058 Participants.中国控烟的地域不平等:来自 98058 名参与者的多层次证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 May 3;20(6):755-765. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx100.
5
Results from the Albanian Adult Tobacco Survey.阿尔巴尼亚成人烟草调查结果。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;16(4):182-8. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3487.
6
Probing the smoking-suicide association: do smoking policy interventions affect suicide risk?探究吸烟与自杀之间的关联:吸烟政策干预措施会影响自杀风险吗?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Nov;16(11):1487-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu106. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
7
Analysis of Tobacco Price Elasticity in Albania Using Household Level Data.利用家庭层面数据分析阿尔巴尼亚的烟草价格弹性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 9;17(2):432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020432.
8
Effects of state cigarette excise taxes and smoke-free air policies on state per capita alcohol consumption in the United States, 1980 to 2009.1980年至2009年美国州卷烟消费税和无烟空气政策对各州人均酒精消费量的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Oct;38(10):2630-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12533. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
9
Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Smoking among Schoolchildren in Albania.阿尔巴尼亚在校儿童吸烟的流行率及社会人口学相关性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;21(9):1145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091145.
10
Projecting the effects of tobacco control policies in the USA through microsimulation: a study protocol.通过微观模拟预测美国烟草控制政策的效果:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e019169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019169.

引用本文的文献

1
Are there gender based differences in participation and time spent in physical activity in Albania? Evidence from 2017-18 demographic and health survey.阿尔巴尼亚在体育活动参与度和花费时间上是否存在基于性别的差异?来自2017 - 18年人口与健康调查的证据。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;80(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00930-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Economics of tobacco control (part 3): evidence from the ITC Project.烟草控制经济学(第3部分):来自国际烟草控制项目的证据
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(Suppl 1):s1-s2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054832.
2
The impact of tobacco control policies in Albania.阿尔巴尼亚烟草控制政策的影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Dec;19(6):463-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.034652. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
3
Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.了解不同教育程度人群的健康行为差异。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
4
Results from the Albanian Adult Tobacco Survey.阿尔巴尼亚成人烟草调查结果。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;16(4):182-8. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3487.
5
Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.两阶段残差包含估计:解决健康计量经济学建模中的内生性问题
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
6
The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity.烟草控制量表:一种衡量国家行动的新量表。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15(3):247-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015347.
7
Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income.欧盟吸烟率的不平等现象:教育程度与收入比较。
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):756-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.022.
8
Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education.1985年至2000年间九个欧洲国家按教育程度划分的吸烟行为趋势。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):395-401. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.025684.