Suppr超能文献

直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在左心室血栓中的应用比较。

Off-label Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombi.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.

Virginia Commonwealth University Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):685-692. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0652.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Left ventricular (LV) thrombi can arise in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Anticoagulation is thought to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), but there are no high-quality data on the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for this indication.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes associated with DOAC use and warfarin use for the treatment of LV thrombi.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort study was performed at 3 tertiary care academic medical centers among 514 eligible patients with echocardiographically diagnosed LV thrombi between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. Follow-up was performed through the end of the study period.

EXPOSURES

Type and duration of anticoagulant use.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Clinically apparent SSE.

RESULTS

A total of 514 patients (379 men; mean [SD] age, 58.4 [14.8] years) with LV thrombi were identified, including 300 who received warfarin and 185 who received a DOAC (64 patients switched treatment between these groups). The median follow-up across the patient cohort was 351 days (interquartile range, 51-866 days). On unadjusted analysis, DOAC treatment vs warfarin use (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% CI, 1.31-5.57; P = .01) and prior SSE (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.22-3.72; P = .01) were associated with SSE. On multivariable analysis, anticoagulation with DOAC vs warfarin (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.28-5.43; P = .01) and prior SSE (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.17-3.66; P = .01) remained significantly associated with SSE.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this multicenter cohort study of anticoagulation strategies for LV thrombi, DOAC treatment was associated with a higher risk of SSE compared with warfarin use, even after adjustment for other factors. These results challenge the assumption of DOAC equivalence with warfarin for LV thrombi and highlight the need for prospective randomized clinical trials to determine the most effective treatment strategies for LV thrombi.

摘要

重要性

左心室(LV)血栓可发生于缺血性和非缺血性心肌病患者。抗凝治疗被认为可降低中风或全身性栓塞(SSE)的风险,但对于这种适应症,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的有效性尚无高质量数据。

目的

比较 DOAC 与华法林用于治疗 LV 血栓的疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 3 家三级护理学术医疗中心进行的队列研究,纳入 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间经超声心动图诊断为 LV 血栓的 514 名符合条件的患者。通过研究结束时的随访来评估结局。

暴露

抗凝治疗的类型和持续时间。

主要结局和测量指标

临床明显的 SSE。

结果

共纳入 514 例患者(379 例男性;平均[SD]年龄,58.4[14.8]岁),其中 300 例接受华法林治疗,185 例接受 DOAC 治疗(64 例在这两组之间转换了治疗方案)。整个患者队列的中位随访时间为 351 天(四分位距,51-866 天)。未经校正分析,与华法林相比,DOAC 治疗(风险比[HR],2.71;95%CI,1.31-5.57;P = .01)和既往 SSE(HR,2.13;95%CI,1.22-3.72;P = .01)与 SSE 相关。多变量分析显示,与华法林相比,DOAC 抗凝(HR,2.64;95%CI,1.28-5.43;P = .01)和既往 SSE(HR,2.07;95%CI,1.17-3.66;P = .01)与 SSE 仍显著相关。

结论和相关性

在这项关于 LV 血栓抗凝策略的多中心队列研究中,与华法林相比,DOAC 治疗与 SSE 风险增加相关,即使在调整了其他因素后也是如此。这些结果对 DOAC 等效于华法林用于 LV 血栓的假设提出了挑战,并强调需要前瞻性随机临床试验来确定 LV 血栓的最有效治疗策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Left Ventricular Thrombus: Contemporary Etiologies, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.左心室血栓:当代病因、治疗策略及转归
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):2007-2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验