Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical center location VUmc, The Netherlands.
Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical center location VUmc, The Netherlands.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Mar;41(3):569-578. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20915403. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) is one of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which can be visualized using [F]florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET). The aim of this study was to evaluate various parametric methods and to assess their test-retest (TRT) reliability. Two 90 min dynamic [F]florbetapir PET scans, including arterial sampling, were acquired ( = 8 AD patient, = 8 controls). The following parametric methods were used; (reference:cerebellum); Logan and spectral analysis (SA), receptor parametric mapping (RPM), simplified reference tissue model2 (SRTM2), reference Logan (rLogan) and standardized uptake value ratios (SUV). BP+1, DVR, V and SUVr were compared with corresponding estimates (V or DVR) from the plasma input reversible two tissue compartmental (2T4k_V) model with corresponding TRT values for 90-scan duration. RPM ( = 0.92; slope = 0.91), Logan ( = 0.95; slope = 0.84) and rLogan ( = 0.94; slope = 0.88), and SRTM2 ( = 0.91; slope = 0.83), SA ( = 0.91; slope = 0.88), SUVr ( = 0.84; slope = 1.16) correlated well with their 2T4k_V counterparts. RPM (controls: 1%, AD: 3%), rLogan (controls: 1%, AD: 3%) and SUV (controls: 3%, AD: 8%) showed an excellent TRT reliability. In conclusion, most parametric methods showed excellent performance for [F]florbetapir, but RPM and rLogan seem the methods of choice, combining the highest accuracy and best TRT reliability.
淀粉样蛋白 β (Aβ) 的积累是阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 的病理标志之一,可以通过 [F]florbetapir 正电子发射断层扫描 (PET) 进行可视化。本研究旨在评估各种参数方法,并评估它们的测试-重测 (TRT) 可靠性。进行了两次 90 分钟的动态 [F]florbetapir PET 扫描,包括动脉采样 ( = 8 名 AD 患者, = 8 名对照)。使用了以下参数方法:(参考:小脑);Logan 和谱分析 (SA)、受体参数映射 (RPM)、简化参考组织模型 2 (SRTM2)、参考 Logan (rLogan) 和标准化摄取值比 (SUV)。BP+1、DVR、V 和 SUVr 与相应的血浆输入可逆两组织隔室 (2T4k_V) 模型的估计值 (V 或 DVR) 进行了比较,并与 90 分钟扫描持续时间的相应 TRT 值进行了比较。RPM ( = 0.92;斜率 = 0.91)、Logan ( = 0.95;斜率 = 0.84) 和 rLogan ( = 0.94;斜率 = 0.88),以及 SRTM2 ( = 0.91;斜率 = 0.83)、SA ( = 0.91;斜率 = 0.88)、SUVr ( = 0.84;斜率 = 1.16) 与 2T4k_V 对应的方法相关性良好。RPM (对照:1%,AD:3%)、rLogan (对照:1%,AD:3%) 和 SUV (对照:3%,AD:8%) 显示出优异的 TRT 可靠性。总之,大多数参数方法对 [F]florbetapir 表现出优异的性能,但 RPM 和 rLogan 似乎是最佳选择,结合了最高的准确性和最佳的 TRT 可靠性。