Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Sep 3;14(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01069-6.
Biomarkers for amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) have predictive value for clinical progression, but it is not clear how individuals move through these stages. We examined changes in ATN profiles over time, and investigated determinants of change in A status, in a sample of cognitively normal individuals presenting with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).
We included 92 individuals with SCD from the SCIENCe project with [F]florbetapir PET (A) available at two time points (65 ± 8y, 42% female, MMSE 29 ± 1, follow-up 2.5 ± 0.7y). We additionally used [F]flortaucipir PET for T and medial temporal atrophy score on MRI for N. Thirty-nine individuals had complete biomarker data at baseline and follow-up, enabling the construction of ATN profiles at two time points. All underwent extensive neuropsychological assessments (follow-up time 4.9 ± 2.8y, median number of visits n = 4). We investigated changes in biomarker status and ATN profiles over time. We assessed which factors predisposed for a change from A- to A+ using logistic regression. We additionally used linear mixed models to assess change from A- to A+, compared to the group that remained A- at follow-up, as predictor for cognitive decline.
At baseline, 62% had normal AD biomarkers (A-T-N- n = 24), 5% had non-AD pathologic change (A-T-N+ n = 2,) and 33% fell within the Alzheimer's continuum (A+T-N- n = 9, A+T+N- n = 3, A+T+N+ n = 1). Seventeen subjects (44%) changed to another ATN profile over time. Only 6/17 followed the Alzheimer's disease sequence of A → T → N, while 11/17 followed a different order (e.g., reverted back to negative biomarker status). APOE ε4 carriership inferred an increased risk of changing from A- to A+ (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.2-22.8)). Individuals who changed from A- to A+, showed subtly steeper decline on Stroop I (β - 0.03 (SE 0.01)) and Stroop III (- 0.03 (0.01)), compared to individuals who remained A-.
We observed considerable variability in the order of ATN biomarkers becoming abnormal. Individuals who became A+ at follow-up showed subtle decline on tests for attention and executive functioning, confirming clinical relevance of amyloid positivity.
淀粉样蛋白、tau 和神经退行性变(ATN)的生物标志物对临床进展具有预测价值,但目前尚不清楚个体是如何经历这些阶段的。我们研究了认知正常个体出现主观认知下降(SCD)时,随时间推移 ATN 谱的变化,并探讨了 A 状态变化的决定因素。
我们纳入了 SCIENCe 项目中的 92 名 SCD 患者,这些患者在两个时间点(65±8 岁,42%为女性,MMSE 29±1,随访 2.5±0.7 年)接受了[F]florbetapir PET(A)检查。我们还使用[F]flortaucipir PET 检查了 T,使用 MRI 检查了内侧颞叶萎缩评分(N)。39 名患者在基线和随访时均具有完整的生物标志物数据,从而能够构建两个时间点的 ATN 谱。所有患者均接受了广泛的神经心理学评估(随访时间 4.9±2.8 年,中位数就诊次数 n=4)。我们研究了随时间推移的生物标志物状态和 ATN 谱的变化。我们使用逻辑回归评估了哪些因素使 A-变为 A+。我们还使用线性混合模型,将从 A-变为 A+作为预测认知下降的因素,与在随访时仍为 A-的组进行比较。
基线时,62%的患者 AD 生物标志物正常(A-T-N- n=24),5%的患者存在非 AD 病理性改变(A-T-N+ n=2),33%的患者处于阿尔茨海默病连续谱内(A+T-N- n=9,A+T+N- n=3,A+T+N+ n=1)。17 名患者(44%)随时间推移转为另一种 ATN 谱。只有 6/17 名患者遵循阿尔茨海默病的 A→T→N 序列,而 11/17 名患者遵循不同的顺序(例如,恢复为阴性生物标志物状态)。APOE ε4 携带增加了从 A-变为 A+的风险(OR 5.2(95%CI 1.2-22.8))。与仍为 A-的患者相比,从 A-变为 A+的患者在 Stroop I(β-0.03(SE 0.01))和 Stroop III(-0.03(0.01))上的下降更为明显。
我们观察到 ATN 生物标志物异常的顺序存在相当大的可变性。在随访时变为 A+的患者在注意力和执行功能测试上表现出轻微的下降,证实了淀粉样蛋白阳性的临床相关性。