From the Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.J.M., I.Z.J.).
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (J.J.M.).
Circ Res. 2020 Apr 24;126(9):1297-1319. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315930. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory vascular disease and the predominant cause of heart attack and ischemic stroke. Despite the well-known sexual dimorphism in the incidence and complications of atherosclerosis, there are relatively limited data in the clinical and preclinical literature to rigorously address mechanisms underlying sex as a biological variable in atherosclerosis. In multiple histological and imaging studies, overall plaque burden and markers of inflammation appear to be greater in men than women and are predictive of cardiovascular events. However, while younger women are relatively protected from cardiovascular disease, by the seventh decade, the incidence of myocardial infarction in women ultimately surpasses that of men, suggesting an interaction between sex and age. Most preclinical studies in animal atherosclerosis models do not examine both sexes, and even in those that do, well-powered direct statistical comparisons for sex as an independent variable remain rare. This article reviews the available data. Overall, male animals appear to have more inflamed yet smaller plaques compared to female animals. Plaque inflammation is often used as a surrogate end point for plaque vulnerability in animals. The available data support the notion that rather than plaque size, plaque inflammation may be more relevant in assessing sex-specific mechanisms since the findings correlate with the sex difference in ischemic events and mortality and thus may be more reflective of the human condition. Overall, the number of preclinical studies directly comparing plaque inflammation between the sexes is extremely limited relative to the vast literature exploring atherosclerosis mechanisms. Failure to include both sexes and to address age in mechanistic atherosclerosis studies are missed opportunities to uncover underlying sex-specific mechanisms. Understanding the mechanisms driving sex as a biological variable in atherosclerotic disease is critical to future precision medicine strategies to mitigate what is still the leading cause of death of men and women worldwide.
动脉粥样硬化是一种慢性炎症性血管疾病,也是心脏病发作和缺血性中风的主要原因。尽管动脉粥样硬化的发病率和并发症存在明显的性别二态性,但在临床和临床前文献中,能够严格阐明性别作为动脉粥样硬化生物学变量的机制的数据相对较少。在多项组织学和影像学研究中,男性的总体斑块负担和炎症标志物似乎高于女性,并且可预测心血管事件。然而,尽管年轻女性相对免受心血管疾病的影响,但到了 70 岁,女性心肌梗死的发病率最终超过了男性,这表明性别与年龄之间存在相互作用。大多数动物动脉粥样硬化模型的临床前研究都没有同时检测两种性别,即使有,作为独立变量的性别进行有力的直接统计比较也很少见。本文综述了现有数据。总体而言,与雌性动物相比,雄性动物的斑块炎症更为严重,但斑块较小。斑块炎症通常被用作动物斑块易损性的替代终点。现有数据支持这样一种观点,即斑块炎症可能比斑块大小更能反映评估性别特异性机制,因为这些发现与缺血事件和死亡率的性别差异相关,因此可能更能反映人类的状况。总的来说,直接比较两种性别之间斑块炎症的临床前研究数量与探索动脉粥样硬化机制的大量文献相比非常有限。在机制性动脉粥样硬化研究中,未能同时纳入两种性别并解决年龄问题是一个错失的机会,无法发现潜在的性别特异性机制。了解性别作为动脉粥样硬化疾病生物学变量的驱动机制,对于未来的精准医疗策略至关重要,这有助于减轻性别仍是全球男性和女性主要死亡原因的现状。