Rangachari Pavani, Griffin Dixie D, Ghosh Santu, May Kathleen R
Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Division of Allergy-Immunology and Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082704.
This study assesses differences between users and non-users of unscheduled healthcare for persistent childhood asthma, with regard to select demographic and risk factors. The objectives are to provide important healthcare utilization information and a foundation for future research on self-management effectiveness (SME), informed by a recently developed "holistic framework" for measuring SME in childhood asthma. An 18-month retrospective chart review was conducted on 59 pediatric outpatients with persistent asthma-mild, moderate, or severe, to obtain data on various demographic and risk factors, and healthcare use for each child. The study examined five types of "unscheduled" healthcare use. Users had non-zero encounters (at least one) in any of the five types; non-users had zero encounters (not even one) in all five types. Differences between users and non-users were assessed using contingency table and logistic regression analysis. There were 25 users and 34 non-users of unscheduled healthcare. Each severity category contained users and non-users. The only statistically significant finding was that the mild persistent category had fewer users than severe persistent ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences between users and non-users for any other demographic or risk factor examined. After adjusting for asthma severity, there were no other significant differences between users and non-users of unscheduled healthcare. This is a crucial finding which suggests that something else is driving unscheduled healthcare use in these children, given there were users and non-users in each asthma severity category. These results provide impetus for future research on the role of other aspects of the "holistic framework" in explaining differences in uses of unscheduled healthcare in persistent childhood asthma.
本研究评估了患有持续性儿童哮喘的非预约医疗使用者与非使用者在特定人口统计学和风险因素方面的差异。目的是提供重要的医疗保健利用信息,并为未来关于自我管理效果(SME)的研究奠定基础,该研究以最近开发的用于衡量儿童哮喘SME的“整体框架”为依据。对59名患有轻度、中度或重度持续性哮喘的儿科门诊患者进行了为期18个月的回顾性病历审查,以获取每个孩子的各种人口统计学和风险因素以及医疗保健使用情况的数据。该研究考察了五种类型的“非预约”医疗保健使用情况。使用者在这五种类型中的任何一种中有非零次就诊(至少一次);非使用者在所有五种类型中的就诊次数均为零(甚至一次都没有)。使用列联表和逻辑回归分析评估使用者与非使用者之间的差异。有25名非预约医疗保健使用者和34名非使用者。每个严重程度类别都包含使用者和非使用者。唯一具有统计学意义的发现是轻度持续性类别中的使用者比重度持续性类别中的使用者少(<0.05)。在所检查的任何其他人口统计学或风险因素方面,使用者与非使用者之间没有显著差异。在调整哮喘严重程度后,非预约医疗保健使用者与非使用者之间没有其他显著差异。这是一个关键发现,表明在这些儿童中,有其他因素推动了非预约医疗保健的使用,因为每个哮喘严重程度类别中都有使用者和非使用者。这些结果为未来研究“整体框架”的其他方面在解释持续性儿童哮喘中非预约医疗保健使用差异方面的作用提供了动力。