• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童因哮喘“单次”和“重复”就诊于急诊科的人口统计学和危险因素差异。

Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with "One-Time" and "Repeat" Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma.

机构信息

Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.

Division of Biostatistics and Data Science, Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020486.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020486
PMID:33435304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7827100/
Abstract

This retrospective study examines demographic and risk factor differences between children who visited the emergency department (ED) for asthma once ("one-time") and more than once ("repeat") over an 18-month period at an academic medical center. The purpose is to contribute to the literature on ED utilization for asthma and provide a foundation for future primary research on self-management effectiveness (SME) of childhood asthma. For the first round of analysis, an 18-month retrospective chart review was conducted on 252 children (0-17 years) who visited the ED for asthma in 2019-2020, to obtain data on demographics, risk factors, and ED visits for each child. Of these, 160 (63%) were "one-time" and 92 (37%) were "repeat" ED patients. Demographic and risk factor differences between "one-time" and "repeat" ED patients were assessed using contingency table and logistic regression analyses. A second round of analysis was conducted on patients in the age-group 8-17 years to match another retrospective asthma study recently completed in the outpatient clinics at the same (study) institution. The first-round analysis indicated that except , none of the individual demographic or risk factors were statistically significant in predicting of "repeat" ED visits. More unequivocally, the second-round analysis revealed that none of the individual factors examined (including , , , , and , among others) were statistically significant in predicting "repeat" ED visits for childhood asthma. A key implication of the results therefore is that something other than the factors examined is driving "repeat" ED visits in children with asthma. In addition to contributing to the ED utilization literature, the results serve to corroborate findings from the recent outpatient study and bolster the impetus for future primary research on SME of childhood asthma.

摘要

这项回顾性研究考察了在学术医疗中心,18 个月期间因哮喘首次(“单次”)和多次(“重复”)前往急诊部(ED)就诊的儿童在人口统计学和风险因素方面的差异。其目的是为 ED 利用哮喘文献做出贡献,并为未来儿童哮喘自我管理效果(SME)的初级研究提供基础。在第一轮分析中,对 2019-2020 年期间因哮喘前往 ED 的 252 名(0-17 岁)儿童进行了为期 18 个月的回顾性图表审查,以获取每位儿童的人口统计学、风险因素和 ED 就诊数据。其中,160 名(63%)为“单次”,92 名(37%)为“重复”ED 患者。使用列联表和逻辑回归分析评估“单次”和“重复”ED 患者之间的人口统计学和风险因素差异。第二轮分析针对年龄在 8-17 岁的患者进行,以匹配同一(研究)机构门诊最近完成的另一项回顾性哮喘研究。第一轮分析表明,除了 ,没有任何单个人口统计学或风险因素在预测“重复”ED 就诊方面具有统计学意义。更明确地说,第二轮分析表明,在所检查的单个因素(包括 、、、、和 等)中,没有一个在预测儿童哮喘的“重复”ED 就诊方面具有统计学意义。因此,结果的一个关键含义是,除了检查过的因素之外,还有其他因素导致哮喘儿童的“重复”ED 就诊。除了为 ED 利用文献做出贡献外,这些结果还证实了最近门诊研究的发现,并为未来儿童哮喘 SME 的初级研究提供了动力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ae/7827100/59ef2ee7c754/ijerph-18-00486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ae/7827100/59ef2ee7c754/ijerph-18-00486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80ae/7827100/59ef2ee7c754/ijerph-18-00486-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with "One-Time" and "Repeat" Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma.儿童因哮喘“单次”和“重复”就诊于急诊科的人口统计学和危险因素差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020486.
2
Demographic and Risk-Factor Differences between Users and Non-Users of Unscheduled Healthcare among Pediatric Outpatients with Persistent Asthma.持续性哮喘儿科门诊患者中未预约医疗服务使用者与非使用者之间的人口统计学和风险因素差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082704.
3
Association between outpatient follow-up and pediatric emergency department asthma visits.门诊随访与儿科急诊科哮喘就诊之间的关联。
J Asthma. 2003;40(7):741-9. doi: 10.1081/jas-120023499.
4
Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization and Reliance by Insurance Coverage in the United States.美国儿童急诊科利用情况及保险覆盖下的依赖程度
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(12):1483-1490. doi: 10.1111/acem.13281. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Children's emergency department use for asthma, 2001-2010.儿童哮喘急诊就诊情况,2001-2010 年。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.10.011. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Predicting future emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument - Emergency Department version (PACCI-ED).使用儿科哮喘控制与沟通工具-急诊科版(PACCI-ED)预测未来哮喘患者的急诊科就诊和住院情况。
J Asthma. 2016;53(4):387-91. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1115520. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
7
Emergency department revisits for pediatric acute asthma exacerbations: association of factors identified in an emergency department asthma tracking system.儿科急性哮喘加重的急诊科复诊:急诊科哮喘追踪系统中确定的因素之间的关联
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):505-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318180fdcb.
8
Predictors of frequent emergency department utilization in Southeastern Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州东南部急诊科频繁就诊的预测因素。
J Asthma. 2006 Apr;43(3):219-23. doi: 10.1080/02770900600567015.
9
Predictors of future acute asthma visits among children receiving guideline recommended emergency department discharge management.预测接受指南推荐的急诊部门出院管理的儿童未来急性哮喘就诊的因素。
J Asthma. 2021 Aug;58(8):1024-1031. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1761383. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Risk factors for repeat adverse asthma events in children after visiting an emergency department.儿童在急诊科就诊后再次发生不良哮喘事件的风险因素。
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Disease Severity, Age of Child, and Clinic No-Shows on Unscheduled Healthcare Use for Childhood Asthma at an Academic Medical Center.疾病严重程度、儿童年龄和诊所失约对学术医疗中心儿童哮喘非计划性医疗保健使用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021508.
2
Investigating the Outcomes of an Asthma Educational Program and Useful Influence in Public Policy.调查哮喘教育计划的结果及其对公共政策的有益影响。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;9:736203. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.736203. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed methods study to explore the Outcomes of ChildrEn and fAmilies in the first year after paediatric Intensive Care: the OCEANIC study.多中心纵向混合方法研究方案,旨在探讨儿科重症监护后第一年儿童及其家庭的结局:OCEANIC 研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 17;10(5):e038974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038974.
2
Demographic and Risk-Factor Differences between Users and Non-Users of Unscheduled Healthcare among Pediatric Outpatients with Persistent Asthma.持续性哮喘儿科门诊患者中未预约医疗服务使用者与非使用者之间的人口统计学和风险因素差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082704.
3
The Association of Adverse Childhood Experiences With Anxiety and Depression for Children and Youth, 8 to 17 Years of Age.
儿童和青少年 8 至 17 岁时期,不良童年经历与焦虑和抑郁的关联。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jul;20(5):600-608. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Measurement of Key Constructs in a Holistic Framework for Assessing Self-Management Effectiveness of Pediatric Asthma.在评估儿童哮喘自我管理有效性的整体框架中测量关键结构
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 23;16(17):3060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173060.
5
Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data.基于大样本人群观察性研究的逻辑回归样本量指南:基于真实临床数据强调统计量与参数之间的准确性
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;25(4):122-130. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.4.12. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
Gaps in health insurance coverage and emergency department use among children with asthma.哮喘患儿的医疗保险覆盖范围及急诊科使用情况的差距。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1070-1078. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1523929. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
A framework for measuring self-management effectiveness and health care use among pediatric asthma patients and families.一种用于衡量儿科哮喘患者及其家庭自我管理效果和医疗保健利用情况的框架。
J Asthma Allergy. 2017 Apr 12;10:111-122. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S133481. eCollection 2017.
8
Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective.哮喘支持性自我管理的系统综述:医疗保健视角
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 17;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7.
9
How does patient-provider communication influence adherence to asthma medications?医患沟通如何影响哮喘药物的依从性?
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Asthma-related emergency department use: current perspectives.哮喘相关的急诊科使用:当前观点
Open Access Emerg Med. 2016 Jul 13;8:47-55. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S69973. eCollection 2016.