Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0230913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230913. eCollection 2020.
Object permanence has been investigated with a variety of paradigms and measures, yielding heterogeneous findings. The current study employed a novel Violation-of-Expectation paradigm measuring pupil dilation as indicator of cognitive effort and surprise. Across repeated trials, infants watched videos of animated toys either stopping in an open door frame or moving across the open door frame off screen. The door then closed and opened up again to reveal either the toy, or an empty space. In Experiment 1, 18-month-olds's pupils dilated in response to the unexpected empty outcome more than to the expected empty outcome, establishing the paradigm as a suitable measure of violation of object expectation. Using the same paradigm, Experiment 2 revealed an absence of this object expectation effect for 10-month-olds. Results are discussed with regard to paradigmatic aspects and developmental differences. It is suggested that young infants do not automatically represent occluded objects upon perceiving occlusion events, and that occlusion events may initially require relevance in terms of individual activity or social interaction.
客体永久性已经通过各种范式和方法进行了研究,得出了不同的结果。本研究采用了一种新颖的违反预期范式,通过瞳孔扩张来衡量认知努力和惊讶程度。在重复的试验中,婴儿观看动画玩具的视频,这些玩具要么停在打开的门框中,要么穿过打开的门框消失在屏幕外。然后门关闭,再次打开,显示玩具或空的空间。在实验 1 中,18 个月大的婴儿的瞳孔在对意外的空结果的反应中比对预期的空结果的反应更大,这表明该范式是违反物体预期的合适测量方法。使用相同的范式,实验 2 显示 10 个月大的婴儿没有这种物体预期效应。结果从范式方面和发展差异方面进行了讨论。研究结果表明,幼儿在感知到遮挡事件时不会自动表示被遮挡的物体,而且遮挡事件最初可能需要与个体活动或社会互动相关。