Suppr超能文献

检测透明屏障:反对搜索失败的手段-目的缺陷解释的明确证据。

Detecting Transparent Barriers: Clear Evidence Against the Means-End Deficit Account of Search Failures.

作者信息

Shinskey Jeanne L, Munakata Yuko

机构信息

Department of Psychology University of Denver.

出版信息

Infancy. 2001 Jul;2(3):395-404. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0203_7. Epub 2001 Jul 1.

Abstract

The standard explanation of infants' search failures with hidden objects, despite an apparent sensitivity to them, is a deficit in the means-end skill for retrieving objects from occluders. Studies equating means-end demands for retrieving toys from transparent and opaque barriers challenge this account by showing that infants succeed more with visible objects. However, they suffer from a critical limitation: Infants may retrieve visible objects without noticing the transparent barriers in front of them. We addressed this concern by requiring infants to notice a barrier to retrieve a toy and specifically to pull down a rotating screen to retrieve a toy from behind it. Seven-month-olds used this means-end skill more often with a transparent barrier than an opaque one. Thus, neither a means-end deficit nor an ability to ignore transparent barriers fully accounts for search failures. Relations to other findings challenging the means-end deficit account and implications for approaches to studying cognitive development are discussed.

摘要

对于婴儿在隐藏物体搜索任务中失败的标准解释是,尽管他们似乎对隐藏物体有一定敏感性,但在从遮挡物中取回物体的手段-目的技能方面存在缺陷。一些研究通过让婴儿从透明和不透明障碍物中取回玩具,并使取回玩具的手段-目的要求相等,结果显示婴儿在可见物体的情况下成功率更高,从而对这一解释提出了挑战。然而,这些研究存在一个关键局限:婴儿可能在没有注意到面前透明障碍物的情况下取回可见物体。我们通过要求婴儿注意一个障碍物以取回玩具,特别是拉下一个旋转屏幕以从其后面取回玩具,来解决这一问题。七个月大的婴儿在面对透明障碍物时比面对不透明障碍物时更频繁地使用这种手段-目的技能。因此,手段-目的缺陷以及忽略透明障碍物的能力都不能完全解释搜索失败的原因。本文还讨论了与其他挑战手段-目的缺陷解释的研究结果的关系,以及对认知发展研究方法的启示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验