Shinskey Jeanne L, Munakata Yuko
Department of Psychology University of Denver.
Infancy. 2001 Jul;2(3):395-404. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0203_7. Epub 2001 Jul 1.
The standard explanation of infants' search failures with hidden objects, despite an apparent sensitivity to them, is a deficit in the means-end skill for retrieving objects from occluders. Studies equating means-end demands for retrieving toys from transparent and opaque barriers challenge this account by showing that infants succeed more with visible objects. However, they suffer from a critical limitation: Infants may retrieve visible objects without noticing the transparent barriers in front of them. We addressed this concern by requiring infants to notice a barrier to retrieve a toy and specifically to pull down a rotating screen to retrieve a toy from behind it. Seven-month-olds used this means-end skill more often with a transparent barrier than an opaque one. Thus, neither a means-end deficit nor an ability to ignore transparent barriers fully accounts for search failures. Relations to other findings challenging the means-end deficit account and implications for approaches to studying cognitive development are discussed.
对于婴儿在隐藏物体搜索任务中失败的标准解释是,尽管他们似乎对隐藏物体有一定敏感性,但在从遮挡物中取回物体的手段-目的技能方面存在缺陷。一些研究通过让婴儿从透明和不透明障碍物中取回玩具,并使取回玩具的手段-目的要求相等,结果显示婴儿在可见物体的情况下成功率更高,从而对这一解释提出了挑战。然而,这些研究存在一个关键局限:婴儿可能在没有注意到面前透明障碍物的情况下取回可见物体。我们通过要求婴儿注意一个障碍物以取回玩具,特别是拉下一个旋转屏幕以从其后面取回玩具,来解决这一问题。七个月大的婴儿在面对透明障碍物时比面对不透明障碍物时更频繁地使用这种手段-目的技能。因此,手段-目的缺陷以及忽略透明障碍物的能力都不能完全解释搜索失败的原因。本文还讨论了与其他挑战手段-目的缺陷解释的研究结果的关系,以及对认知发展研究方法的启示。