Female College of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):1089-1096. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.1089.
A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of holistic nursing intervention upon the knowledge regarding care during myelosupression among patients with cancer at a selected hospital in Chennai, India.
A quantitative research approach of quasi experimental non-equivalent with control group before -after design (non randomized) was used. The investigator included 204 participants by using purposive sampling technique which included 102 each in study and comparison group. Pre-test was done before the intervention of holistic nursing to both comparison and study group participants. Holistic nursing intervention was implemented for study group whereas comparison group received routine care. Post test was done by using the structured questionnaire after 1month. The responses from the participants were coded and statistically analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics.
The knowledge scores obtained by study group was significantly higher (13.32+2.94) when compared to comparison group (8.12+2.04). There was a statistically significant difference between study and comparison group participants, at p< 0.001. With regard to the dimensions of knowledge related to disease condition and signs and symptoms were higher in the study group when compared to the comparison group. The difference was statistically significant at p.
在印度钦奈的一家选定医院，进行了一项研究，评估整体护理干预对癌症患者骨髓抑制期护理知识的影响。
采用准实验性非均等对照组前后测设计（非随机）的定量研究方法。研究者通过目的抽样技术纳入了 204 名参与者，其中研究组和对照组各有 102 名参与者。在对整体护理干预前，对对照组和研究组的参与者进行了预测试。对研究组实施整体护理干预，而对照组则接受常规护理。在 1 个月后，通过结构化问卷进行了后测。对参与者的回答进行编码，并通过描述性和推断性统计进行了统计分析。
与对照组（8.12+2.04）相比，研究组的知识得分（13.32+2.94）显著更高。研究组和对照组的参与者之间存在统计学显著差异，p<0.001。在与疾病状况和症状相关的知识维度方面，研究组的得分高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义，p.
