Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116805. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116805. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Functional brain networks are shaped and constrained by the underlying structural network. However, functional networks are not merely a one-to-one reflection of the structural network. Several theories have been put forward to understand the relationship between structural and functional networks. However, it remains unclear how these theories can be unified. Two existing recent theories state that 1) functional networks can be explained by all possible walks in the structural network, which we will refer to as the series expansion approach, and 2) functional networks can be explained by a weighted combination of the eigenmodes of the structural network, the so-called eigenmode approach. To elucidate the unique or common explanatory power of these approaches to estimate functional networks from the structural network, we analysed the relationship between these two existing views. Using linear algebra, we first show that the eigenmode approach can be written in terms of the series expansion approach, i.e., walks on the structural network associated with different hop counts correspond to different weightings of the eigenvectors of this network. Second, we provide explicit expressions for the coefficients for both the eigenmode and series expansion approach. These theoretical results were verified by empirical data from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), demonstrating a strong correlation between the mappings based on both approaches. Third, we analytically and empirically demonstrate that the fit of the eigenmode approach to measured functional data is always at least as good as the fit of the series expansion approach, and that errors in the structural data lead to large errors of the estimated coefficients for the series expansion approach. Therefore, we argue that the eigenmode approach should be preferred over the series expansion approach. Results hold for eigenmodes of the weighted adjacency matrices as well as eigenmodes of the graph Laplacian. Taken together, these results provide an important step towards unification of existing theories regarding the structure-function relationships in brain networks.
功能大脑网络由基础结构网络塑造和限制。然而,功能网络不仅仅是结构网络的一一对应反映。已经提出了几种理论来理解结构和功能网络之间的关系。然而,这些理论如何统一仍然不清楚。现有的两个最近的理论指出:1)功能网络可以通过结构网络中的所有可能的步来解释,我们将其称为级数展开方法;2)功能网络可以通过结构网络的特征模式的加权组合来解释,即所谓的特征模式方法。为了阐明从结构网络估计功能网络时这两种现有观点的独特或共同解释能力,我们分析了这两种观点之间的关系。我们首先使用线性代数证明特征模式方法可以用级数展开方法表示,即与不同跳跃数相关的结构网络上的步对应于该网络特征向量的不同加权。其次,我们提供了特征模式和级数展开方法的系数的显式表达式。这些理论结果通过来自扩散张量成像(DTI)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的经验数据得到了验证,表明基于这两种方法的映射之间存在很强的相关性。第三,我们从理论和经验上证明了特征模式方法对测量功能数据的拟合总是至少与级数展开方法的拟合一样好,并且结构数据中的误差会导致级数展开方法估计系数的大误差。因此,我们认为特征模式方法应该优于级数展开方法。结果适用于加权邻接矩阵的特征模式以及图拉普拉斯的特征模式。总的来说,这些结果为大脑网络中结构-功能关系的现有理论的统一提供了重要的一步。