• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔超级基金灰场基于社区的参与性研究:毒理学培训以提高普通社区的知识水平。

Community-Based Participatory Research at Jacksonville Florida Superfund Ash Site: Toxicology Training to Improve the Knowledge of the Lay Community.

作者信息

Becker Alan, Suther Sandra, Harris Cynthia, Pawlowicz Grazyna, Tucker Gale, Dutton Matthew, Close Fran, Hilliard Aaron, Gragg Richard

机构信息

Florida A&M University, Institute of Public Health, Tallahassee, Florida, 32307.

Florida A&M University, Economic, Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Tallahassee, Florida, 32307.

出版信息

Fla Public Health Rev. 2019 May;15(1-7):61-74.

PMID:32337512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7181972/
Abstract

Until the late 1960's, Jacksonville, Florida incinerated its solid waste with the resultant ash deposited in landfills or used to fill flood-prone areas. These filled areas were later developed into parks, school sites and residential areas. Lead in soil at these sites was the major toxicant of concern and driver of clean-up actions. During the period of assessment of lead-levels in soil, there were no established lines of communication between the City and residents of affected neighborhoods resulting in mistrust in the community. To address communication issues, a community-based, culturally sensitive Community Environmental Toxicology Curriculum (CETC) and a short video were developed for community stakeholders to inform them of risks, health effects, remediation processes and preventive measures. Pre-and post-tests were developed to measure knowledge gained from the toxicology training. Learning gains averaged 47% and 24% for the community leaders and residents respectively. Most participants strongly agreed that the community toxicology curriculum was a useful tool for promoting awareness of environmental risks in their community and addressing the gap in trust between residents and agencies involved in site remediation.

摘要

直到20世纪60年代末,佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔市一直对其固体废物进行焚烧,产生的灰烬被倾倒在垃圾填埋场或用于填充易发生洪水的地区。这些填埋区域后来被开发成公园、学校场地和居民区。这些场地土壤中的铅是主要的关注毒物,也是清理行动的推动因素。在评估土壤铅含量期间,该市与受影响社区的居民之间没有建立沟通渠道,导致社区产生不信任感。为了解决沟通问题,为社区利益相关者开发了一个基于社区、具有文化敏感性的社区环境毒理学课程(CETC)和一个短视频,向他们介绍风险、健康影响、修复过程和预防措施。还设计了前后测试来衡量从毒理学培训中获得的知识。社区领袖和居民的学习收获平均分别为47%和24%。大多数参与者强烈认为,社区毒理学课程是提高社区对环境风险的认识以及弥合居民与参与场地修复的机构之间信任差距的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e67/7181972/6e4655ba2b8b/nihms-1559625-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e67/7181972/f6a3bb2237e9/nihms-1559625-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e67/7181972/6e4655ba2b8b/nihms-1559625-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e67/7181972/f6a3bb2237e9/nihms-1559625-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e67/7181972/6e4655ba2b8b/nihms-1559625-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Community-Based Participatory Research at Jacksonville Florida Superfund Ash Site: Toxicology Training to Improve the Knowledge of the Lay Community.佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔超级基金灰场基于社区的参与性研究:毒理学培训以提高普通社区的知识水平。
Fla Public Health Rev. 2019 May;15(1-7):61-74.
2
Physician Training Related to Environmental Hazards near Ash Superfund Sites.与灰渣超级基金场地附近环境危害相关的医生培训
Eur J Environ Public Health. 2021;5(2). doi: 10.21601/ejeph/11096. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
3
Risks to children from exposure to lead in air during remedial or removal activities at Superfund sites: a case study of the RSR lead smelter Superfund site.在超级基金场地进行补救或清除活动期间,儿童因接触空气中的铅而面临的风险:RSR铅冶炼厂超级基金场地的案例研究
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;13(1):51-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500254.
4
Applying community resilience theory to engagement with residents facing cumulative environmental exposure risks: lessons from Louisiana's industrial corridor.将社区弹性理论应用于应对面临累积环境暴露风险的居民:来自路易斯安那州工业走廊的经验教训。
Rev Environ Health. 2019 Sep 25;34(3):235-244. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0022.
5
Effects of Residential Environmental Screening and Perception Surveys on Superfund Environmental Health Risk Perceptions.居住环境筛选和感知调查对超级基金环境健康风险认知的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 2;19(13):8146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138146.
6
Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program.评估公众参与环境决策:美国环境保护局的超级基金社区参与计划。
J Environ Manage. 2005 Nov;77(3):165-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
7
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
8
Environmental health perceptions in a superfund community.超级基金社区的环境健康认知。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110151. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110151. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
9
The Environmental Protection Agency's Use of Community Involvement to Engage Communities at Superfund Sites.美国环保署利用社区参与,让社区参与超级基金场地。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214166.
10
Computer-Based Simulation in Blended Learning Curriculum for Hazardous Waste Site Worker Health and Safety Training.基于计算机的模拟在混合式学习课程中用于危险废物场地工人健康与安全培训
Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ. 2009;5(1):62-73. doi: 10.4018/jicte.2009010105.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Engagement in an African American Community during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of a Train-the-Trainer COVID-19 Curriculum.新冠疫情期间非裔美国人社区的社区参与:一项培训培训师新冠课程的评估
Am J Biomed Sci Res. 2024;24(2):121-128. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Physician Training Related to Environmental Hazards near Ash Superfund Sites.与灰渣超级基金场地附近环境危害相关的医生培训
Eur J Environ Public Health. 2021;5(2). doi: 10.21601/ejeph/11096. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing Patterns of Community Interest at a Legacy Mining Waste Site to Assess and Inform Environmental Health Literacy Efforts.分析遗留采矿废料场的社区兴趣模式,以评估并为环境健康素养工作提供信息。
J Environ Stud Sci. 2016 Sep;6(3):543-555. doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0297-x. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
2
A Case Study of Community Involvement Influence on Policy Decisions: Victories of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership.社区参与对政策决策影响的案例研究:基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系的胜利
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 20;13(5):515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050515.
3
Community-Based Participatory Research to Promote Healthy Diet and Nutrition and Prevent and Control Obesity Among African-Americans: a Literature Review.基于社区的参与式研究促进非裔美国人的健康饮食和营养,预防和控制肥胖:文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Apr;4(2):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0225-0. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequalities in environmental health: implications for policy.理解环境健康不平等的累积影响:对政策的启示。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 May;30(5):879-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0153.
5
Applying comparative effectiveness research to public and population health initiatives.将比较效果研究应用于公共和人群健康举措。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):349-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0593.
6
A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution and mortality in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省多伦多市一项关于交通相关空气污染与死亡率的队列研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 May;117(5):772-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11533. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
7
The public health approach to eliminating disparities in health.消除健康差距的公共卫生方法。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Mar;98(3):400-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123919. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
8
U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms.美国的健康差异:描述、成因及机制。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:235-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090852.
9
Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research.学术人员和临床医生参与社区参与式合作研究的策略。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):407-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.407.
10
Health, equity, and the built environment.健康、公平与建成环境。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):A290-1. doi: 10.1289/ehp.113-a290.