Suppr超能文献

采用干骺端套管进行股骨翻修膝关节置换术:从结构角度来看,并非必须使用柄。

Femoral revision knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal sleeves: the use of a stem is not mandatory of a structural point of view.

作者信息

Fonseca F, Sousa A, Completo A

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Coimbra University Hospitals, Coimbra, Portugal.

Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2020 Apr 26;7(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00242-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although metaphyseal sleeves are usually used with stems, little is known about the exact contribution/need of the stem for the initial sleeve-bone interface stability, particularly in the femur, if the intramedullary canal is deformed or bowed. The aim of the present study is (1) to determine the contribution of the diaphyseal-stem on sleeve-femur interface stability and (2) to determine experimentally the strain shielding effect on the metaphyseal femur with and without diaphyseal-stem. It is hypothesised that diaphyseal-stem addition increases the sleeve-femur interface stability and the strain-shielding effect on the metaphyseal femur relatively to the stemless condition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was developed through a combined experimental and finite-element analysis approach. Five synthetic femurs were used to measure cortex strain (triaxial-rosette-gages) behaviour and implant cortex micromotions (Digital Image Correlation) for three techniques: only femoral-component, stemless-sleeve and stemmed-sleeve. Paired t-tests were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the difference of cortex strains and micromotions. Finite-element models were developed to assess the cancellous bone strain behaviour and sleeve-bone interface micromotions; these models were validated against the measurements.

RESULTS

Cortex strains are significantly reduced (p < 0.05) on the stemmed-sleeve with a 150 μstrain mean reduction at the medial and lateral distal sides which compares with a 60 μstrain mean reduction (p > 0.05) on the stemless condition. Both techniques presented a mean cancellous bone strain reduction of 700 μstrain (50%) at the distal region and a mean increase of 2500 μstrain (4x) at the sleeve proximal region relative to the model only with the femoral component. Both techniques presented sleeve-bone micromotions amplitude below 50-150 μm, suitable for bone ingrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a supplemental diaphyseal-stem potentiates the risk of cortex bone resorption as compared to the stemless-sleeve condition; however, the stem is not essential for the enhancement of the initial sleeve-bone stability and has minor effect on the cancellous bone strain behaviour. Based on a purely structural point view, it appears that the use of a diaphyseal-femoral-stem with the metaphyseal sleeve is not mandatory in the revision TKA, which is particularly relevant in cases where the use of stems is impracticable.

摘要

目的

尽管干骺端套筒通常与柄一起使用,但对于柄在初始套筒-骨界面稳定性方面的确切作用/需求知之甚少,尤其是在股骨中,当髓腔变形或弯曲时。本研究的目的是:(1)确定骨干柄对套筒-股骨界面稳定性的作用;(2)通过实验确定有无骨干柄时对干骺端股骨的应变屏蔽效应。假设相对于无柄情况,添加骨干柄可提高套筒-股骨界面稳定性以及对干骺端股骨的应变屏蔽效应。

材料与方法

本研究通过实验与有限元分析相结合的方法开展。使用五根合成股骨来测量三种技术的皮质骨应变(三轴应变片)行为和植入物与皮质骨的微动(数字图像相关技术):仅股骨组件、无柄套筒和有柄套筒。进行配对t检验以评估皮质骨应变和微动差异的统计学显著性。建立有限元模型以评估松质骨应变行为和套筒-骨界面微动;这些模型通过测量数据进行验证。

结果

有柄套筒的皮质骨应变显著降低(p < 0.05),在内侧和外侧远端平均降低150微应变,而无柄情况下平均降低60微应变(p > 0.05)。相对于仅使用股骨组件的模型,两种技术在远端区域的松质骨应变平均降低700微应变(50%),在套筒近端区域平均增加2500微应变(4倍)。两种技术的套筒-骨微动幅度均低于50 - 150微米,适合骨长入。

结论

与无柄套筒情况相比,使用补充性骨干柄会增加皮质骨吸收的风险;然而,柄对于增强初始套筒-骨稳定性并非必不可少,且对松质骨应变行为影响较小。从纯粹的结构角度来看,在翻修全膝关节置换术中,使用带有干骺端套筒的骨干柄似乎并非必需,这在无法使用柄的情况下尤为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验