• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A surface-free design for phase I dual-agent combination trials.用于I期双药联合试验的无表面设计
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Oct;29(10):3093-3109. doi: 10.1177/0962280220919450. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations.多药物组合的剂量发现设计。
Clin Trials. 2011 Aug;8(4):380-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511408748. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
4
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Bayesian optimization design for finding a maximum tolerated dose combination in phase I clinical trials.贝叶斯优化设计在 I 期临床试验中寻找最大耐受剂量组合。
Int J Biostat. 2021 Apr 5;18(1):39-56. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0147.
6
CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.CRM2DIM:一个用于实现双代理贝叶斯连续再评估方法的 SAS 宏。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Jul;176:211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose- escalation in Phase I oncology trials of two agents.超越 3+3 法:两药联合的 I 期肿瘤试验中剂量递增的扩展算法。
Clin Trials. 2011 Jun;8(3):247-59. doi: 10.1177/1740774511404091.
8
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.用于双药一期试验的独立贝塔概率剂量递增设计的一个产物。
Stat Med. 2015 Apr 15;34(8):1261-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.6434. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
10
Local continual reassessment methods for dose finding and optimization in drug-combination trials.局部连续再评估方法在药物联合试验中的剂量发现和优化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):2049-2063. doi: 10.1177/09622802231192955. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations.在治疗组合的早期开发中,偏序连续再评估方法的应用。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):331-339. doi: 10.1177/17407745241234634. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Local continual reassessment methods for dose finding and optimization in drug-combination trials.局部连续再评估方法在药物联合试验中的剂量发现和优化。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):2049-2063. doi: 10.1177/09622802231192955. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.在 I 期联合方案剂量探索试验中部分有序连续再评估方法的实际应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 30;41(30):5789-5809. doi: 10.1002/sim.9594. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
5
A dose-finding design for dual-agent trials with patient-specific doses for one agent with application to an opiate detoxification trial.具有患者特异性剂量的双药物试验的剂量探索设计及其在阿片类药物戒毒试验中的应用。
Pharm Stat. 2022 Mar;21(2):476-495. doi: 10.1002/pst.2181. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
6
Using an Interaction Parameter in Model-Based Phase I Trials for Combination Treatments? A Simulation Study.基于交互作用参数的联合治疗模型的 I 期临床试验?一项模拟研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010345.

本文引用的文献

1
An information theoretic phase I-II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity.一种针对分子靶向药物的信息论I-II期设计,该设计不需要单调性假设。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Feb;68(2):347-367. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12293. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
A benchmark for dose finding studies with continuous outcomes.一种用于连续结局剂量发现研究的基准。
Biostatistics. 2020 Apr 1;21(2):189-201. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy045.
3
A practical Bayesian design to identify the maximum tolerated dose contour for drug combination trials.一种用于确定药物联合试验最大耐受剂量轮廓的实用贝叶斯设计。
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 30;35(27):4924-4936. doi: 10.1002/sim.7095. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
4
Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.药物联合试验中剂量探索的贝叶斯最优区间设计
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):2155-2167. doi: 10.1177/0962280215594494. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
A comparative study of adaptive dose-finding designs for phase I oncology trials of combination therapies.联合疗法肿瘤学I期试验适应性剂量探索设计的比较研究。
Stat Med. 2015 Oct 30;34(24):3194-213. doi: 10.1002/sim.6533. Epub 2015 May 13.
6
The future of immune checkpoint therapy.免疫检查点疗法的未来。
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):56-61. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8172.
7
A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.用于双药一期试验的独立贝塔概率剂量递增设计的一个产物。
Stat Med. 2015 Apr 15;34(8):1261-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.6434. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
A phase I study of decitabine with pegylated interferon α-2b in advanced melanoma: impact on DNA methylation and lymphocyte populations.一项关于地西他滨联合聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b治疗晚期黑色素瘤的I期研究:对DNA甲基化和淋巴细胞群体的影响。
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Oct;32(5):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s10637-014-0115-4. Epub 2014 May 31.
10
A Bayesian dose-finding design for drug combination clinical trials based on the logistic model.一种基于逻辑模型的药物联合临床试验的贝叶斯剂量探索设计。
Pharm Stat. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):247-57. doi: 10.1002/pst.1621. Epub 2014 May 15.

用于I期双药联合试验的无表面设计

A surface-free design for phase I dual-agent combination trials.

作者信息

Mozgunov Pavel, Gasparini Mauro, Jaki Thomas

机构信息

Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche (DISMA) Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Oct;29(10):3093-3109. doi: 10.1177/0962280220919450. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220919450
PMID:32338145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7612168/
Abstract

In oncology, there is a growing number of therapies given in combination. Recently, several dose-finding designs for Phase I dose-escalation trials for combinations were proposed. The majority of novel designs use a pre-specified parametric model restricting the search of the target combination to a surface of a particular form. In this work, we propose a novel model-free design for combination studies, which is based on the assumption of monotonicity within each agent only. Specifically, we parametrise the ratios between each neighbouring combination by independent Beta distributions. As a result, the design does not require the specification of any particular parametric model or knowledge about increasing orderings of toxicity. We compare the performance of the proposed design to the model-based continual reassessment method for partial ordering and to another model-free alternative, the product of independent beta design. In an extensive simulation study, we show that the proposed design leads to comparable or better proportions of correct selections of the target combination while leading to the same or fewer average number of toxic responses in a trial.

摘要

在肿瘤学领域,联合治疗的应用越来越多。最近,针对联合治疗的I期剂量递增试验提出了几种剂量探索设计。大多数新设计使用预先指定的参数模型,将目标联合的搜索限制在特定形式的表面上。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种用于联合研究的新型无模型设计,该设计仅基于每个药物内部单调性的假设。具体而言,我们通过独立的贝塔分布对每个相邻联合之间的比率进行参数化。结果,该设计不需要指定任何特定的参数模型,也不需要关于毒性递增顺序的知识。我们将所提出的设计的性能与基于模型的部分排序连续重新评估方法以及另一种无模型替代方法——独立贝塔设计的乘积进行了比较。在一项广泛的模拟研究中,我们表明,所提出的设计在试验中导致正确选择目标联合的比例相当或更好,同时导致相同或更少的平均毒性反应数量。