Department of Industrial Chemistry, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 4, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research "Renewable Sources, Environment, Blue Growth, Energy", University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 23;17(8):2932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082932.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused the shutdown of entire nations all over the world. In addition to mobility restrictions of people, the World Health Organization and the Governments have prescribed maintaining an inter-personal distance of 1.5 or 2 m (about 6 feet) from each other in order to minimize the risk of contagion through the droplets that we usually disseminate around us from nose and mouth. However, recently published studies support the hypothesis of virus transmission over a distance of 2 m from an infected person. Researchers have proved the higher aerosol and surface stability of SARS-COV-2 as compared with SARS-COV-1 (with the virus remaining viable and infectious in aerosol for hours) and that airborne transmission of SARS-CoV can occur besides close-distance contacts. Indeed, there is reasonable evidence about the possibility of SARS-COV-2 airborne transmission due to its persistence into aerosol droplets in a viable and infectious form. Based on the available knowledge and epidemiological observations, it is plausible that small particles containing the virus may diffuse in indoor environments covering distances up to 10 m from the emission sources, thus representing a kind of aerosol transmission. On-field studies carried out inside Wuhan Hospitals showed the presence of SARS-COV-2 RNA in air samples collected in the hospitals and also in the surroundings, leading to the conclusion that the airborne route has to be considered an important pathway for viral diffusion. Similar findings are reported in analyses concerning air samples collected at the Nebraska University Hospital. On March 16th, we have released a Position Paper emphasizing the airborne route as a possible additional factor for interpreting the anomalous COVID-19 outbreaks in northern Italy, ranked as one of the most polluted areas in Europe and characterized by high particulate matter (PM) concentrations. The available information on the SARS-COV-2 spreading supports the hypothesis of airborne diffusion of infected droplets from person to person at a distance greater than two meters (6 feet). The inter-personal distance of 2 m can be reasonably considered as an effective protection only if everybody wears face masks in daily life activities.
新冠疫情导致全球各国陷入停摆。除了限制人们的行动外,世界卫生组织和各国政府还规定人与人之间要保持 1.5 到 2 米(约 6 英尺)的人际距离,以最大限度地降低通过我们通常从口鼻散发的飞沫传播感染的风险。然而,最近发表的研究支持了感染者在 2 米以外距离传播病毒的假设。研究人员证明,与 SARS-COV-1 相比,SARS-COV-2 的气溶胶和表面稳定性更高(病毒在气溶胶中数小时内保持存活和传染性),而且 SARS-CoV 可通过空气传播,不仅是近距离接触。实际上,由于其以存活和感染形式存在于气溶胶飞沫中,因此有合理的证据表明 SARS-COV-2 可能通过空气传播。根据现有知识和流行病学观察,由于含有病毒的小颗粒可能在室内环境中扩散,传播距离可达排放源 10 米,因此可能存在一种气溶胶传播。在武汉医院进行的现场研究表明,在医院内和周围环境中采集的空气样本中都存在 SARS-COV-2 RNA,这表明空气传播途径是病毒扩散的重要途径。在内布拉斯加大学医院采集的空气样本分析中也报告了类似的发现。3 月 16 日,我们发布了一份立场文件,强调空气传播可能是解释意大利北部异常 COVID-19 疫情的一个额外因素,意大利北部是欧洲污染最严重的地区之一,其颗粒物(PM)浓度很高。关于 SARS-COV-2 传播的现有信息支持了这样一种假设,即感染者的飞沫通过空气在人与人之间传播,距离超过两米(6 英尺)。如果每个人在日常生活活动中都佩戴口罩,那么两米的人际距离可以被合理地认为是一种有效的保护措施。