Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;28(9):1187-1195. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0629-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
We performed a large outcome study at group and individual level in which the goals of genetic counselling were operationalized into cognitive and affective outcomes: empowerment, perceived personal control and anxiety. We then examined which socio-demographic and clinical variables were associated with changes in these outcomes. Data came from 1479 counselees who completed questionnaires (GCOS-18, PPC and STAI) at three time points: before the start of genetic counselling, after the first consultation and after the results of genetic counselling were disclosed. Results showed that at group level empowerment, perceived personal control and anxiety improved significantly after the whole genetic counselling process. Effect-sizes were medium for empowerment and small for the other outcomes. At individual level, 48% of counselees improved in empowerment, 21% in perceived personal control and 17% in anxiety. Around 10% of counselees worsened on all outcomes. Only 'reason for referral' and 'genetic test result' were significantly associated with changes in outcomes. This study demonstrated improvements among counselees in cognitive and affective outcomes after genetic counselling at group level. However, our results also suggest that there are opportunities for improvement at individual level, as many counselees remained stable and some even worsened on all outcomes. Routine outcome monitoring could help to explore the needs of counselees and could help to identify counselees who worsen.
我们在群体和个体水平上进行了一项大型的结果研究,将遗传咨询的目标操作化为认知和情感结果:赋权、感知个人控制和焦虑。然后,我们检查了哪些社会人口统计学和临床变量与这些结果的变化有关。数据来自 1479 名咨询者,他们在三个时间点完成了问卷(GCOS-18、PPC 和 STAI):遗传咨询开始前、第一次咨询后和遗传咨询结果披露后。结果表明,在群体水平上,赋权、感知个人控制和焦虑在整个遗传咨询过程后显著改善。赋权的效应大小为中等,其他结果的效应大小为小。在个体水平上,48%的咨询者在赋权方面有所改善,21%的咨询者在感知个人控制方面有所改善,17%的咨询者在焦虑方面有所改善。约 10%的咨询者在所有结果上都恶化了。只有“转诊原因”和“遗传测试结果”与结果的变化显著相关。本研究表明,在群体水平上,遗传咨询后咨询者在认知和情感结果方面有所改善。然而,我们的结果也表明,在个体水平上还有改进的机会,因为许多咨询者保持稳定,甚至在所有结果上都恶化了。常规结果监测可以帮助探索咨询者的需求,并有助于识别恶化的咨询者。