• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不适当的元认知状态会增加遗传咨询客户的状态焦虑。

Inappropriate Metacognitive Status Increases State Anxiety in Genetic Counseling Clients.

作者信息

Shibata Yuka, Matsushima Masaaki, Takeuchi Megumi, Kato Momoko, Yabe Ichiro

机构信息

Division of Clinical Genetics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:871416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871416. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871416
PMID:35645862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many genetic counseling (GC) studies have focused on anxiety status because clients of GC often feel anxious during their visits. Metacognition is known to be one of the causes of having an inappropriate thinking style. In this study, we examined the relationship between anxiety and the metacognitive status of GC clients according to their characteristics.

METHODS

The participants were 106 clients who attended their first GC session in our hospital from November 2018 to March 2021. The survey items were the clients' characteristics, anxiety status at the time of the visit, and metacognitive status.

RESULTS

High state anxiety and high trait anxiety were observed in 34.9 and 11.3% of clients, respectively. Clients who were a relative or had a family history were significantly more likely to have high state anxiety. As for metacognitive status, only negative beliefs about thoughts concerning uncontrollability and danger were associated with having an anxiety status. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that negative beliefs about thoughts concerning uncontrollability and danger were an independent determinant of higher state anxiety, but not being a relative or having a family history. Metacognitive status scores were significantly lower in clients than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

State anxiety was shown to be more dependent on negative beliefs about thoughts concerning uncontrollability and danger of GC clients than their characteristics such as being a relative or having a family history. The results of this study will contribute to the development of new GC psychosocial support measures to address the anxiety of GC clients.

摘要

背景

许多遗传咨询(GC)研究都聚焦于焦虑状态,因为GC的客户在咨询过程中常常感到焦虑。元认知被认为是产生不恰当思维方式的原因之一。在本研究中,我们根据GC客户的特征,研究了焦虑与元认知状态之间的关系。

方法

研究对象为2018年11月至2021年3月期间在我院首次接受GC咨询的106名客户。调查项目包括客户的特征、咨询时的焦虑状态和元认知状态。

结果

分别有34.9%和11.3% 的客户存在高状态焦虑和高特质焦虑。亲属或有家族病史的客户更易出现高状态焦虑。至于元认知状态,只有对关于不可控性和危险的思维的消极信念与焦虑状态相关。此外,多变量分析表明,对关于不可控性和危险的思维的消极信念是高状态焦虑的独立决定因素,而亲属或家族病史并非如此。客户的元认知状态得分显著低于对照组。

结论

与亲属或家族病史等特征相比,状态焦虑似乎更取决于GC客户对关于不可控性和危险的思维的消极信念。本研究结果将有助于开发新的GC心理社会支持措施,以应对GC客户的焦虑。

相似文献

1
Inappropriate Metacognitive Status Increases State Anxiety in Genetic Counseling Clients.不适当的元认知状态会增加遗传咨询客户的状态焦虑。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:871416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871416. eCollection 2022.
2
The relationship between metacognitive beliefs and symptoms in eating disorders.元认知信念与进食障碍症状之间的关系。
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):225-235. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.225.
3
Prevalence of post-traumatic stress and tests of metacognition as a PTSD risk marker in patients with coronary heart disease and elevated HADS scores: analysis of data from the PATHWAY RCT's in UK cardiac rehabilitation.冠心病患者及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分升高者创伤后应激障碍患病率及作为创伤后应激障碍风险标志物的元认知测试:来自英国心脏康复PATHWAY随机对照试验的数据分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 6;14:1198202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1198202. eCollection 2023.
4
Repetitive negative thinking, metacognitive beliefs, and their interaction as possible predictors for problematic cannabis use.反复消极思维、元认知信念及其相互作用作为大麻使用问题的可能预测因素。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Mar;29(2):706-717. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2664. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
Testing relationships between metacognitive beliefs, anxiety and depression in cardiac and cancer patients: Are they transdiagnostic?检测心脏和癌症患者的元认知信念、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系:它们具有跨诊断性吗?
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Sep;124:109738. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109738. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Maladaptive metacognitive beliefs mediated the effect of intolerance of uncertainty on depression.适应不良的元认知信念中介了不确定性容忍度对抑郁的影响。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Nov;28(6):1525-1534. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2589. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Assessment of the Greek worry-related metacognitions: the Greek version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30).希腊版与担忧相关的元认知评估:元认知问卷(MCQ - 30)希腊语版本。
Psychiatriki. 2014 Jan-Mar;25(1):39-47.
8
A multi-study examination of the relevance of the metacognitive beliefs about uncontrollability in emotion regulation and clinical symptoms.一项关于情绪调节和临床症状中不可控性元认知信念相关性的多研究考察。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:812-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.090. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
9
Anxiety and depression in people with epilepsy: The contribution of metacognitive beliefs.癫痫患者的焦虑与抑郁:元认知信念的作用
Seizure. 2017 Aug;50:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain.消极元认知思维、疼痛灾难化与慢性疼痛适应之间的关系。
Eur J Pain. 2018 Apr;22(4):756-762. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1160. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Theoretical Models of Consciousness: A Scoping Review.意识的理论模型:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 24;11(5):535. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050535.
2
Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review.认知信念及其与躯体疾病中焦虑和抑郁的关系:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 10;15(9):e0238457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238457. eCollection 2020.
3
Trait and state anxiety are mapped differently in the human brain.特质焦虑和状态焦虑在人类大脑中的映射方式不同。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 6;10(1):11112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68008-z.
4
Expectations and psychological issues before genetic counseling: analysis of distress determinant factors.遗传咨询前的期望与心理问题:痛苦决定因素分析
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2020 Apr 29;18:10. doi: 10.1186/s13053-020-00142-1. eCollection 2020.
5
Cognitive and affective outcomes of genetic counselling in the Netherlands at group and individual level: a personalized approach seems necessary.荷兰群体和个体水平上遗传咨询的认知和情感结果:似乎需要个性化方法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;28(9):1187-1195. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0629-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
A Systematic Review of Metacognitive Beliefs in Chronic Medical Conditions.慢性疾病中元认知信念的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02875. eCollection 2019.
7
Testing relationships between metacognitive beliefs, anxiety and depression in cardiac and cancer patients: Are they transdiagnostic?检测心脏和癌症患者的元认知信念、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系:它们具有跨诊断性吗?
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Sep;124:109738. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109738. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
Investigating the role of genetic counseling in neuromuscular disease considering life events.探讨遗传咨询在考虑生活事件的神经肌肉疾病中的作用。
J Hum Genet. 2019 Jun;64(6):551-559. doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0590-8. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases.基因检测心理影响的系统评价:心血管疾病、神经退行性疾病和癌症之间的比较分析
Front Genet. 2018 Dec 10;9:624. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00624. eCollection 2018.
10
Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements.思考思维:基于坐标的元认知判断神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2:2398212818810591. doi: 10.1177/2398212818810591. eCollection 2018.