• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧远端经桡动脉入路(ldTRA):常规桡动脉远端和桡动脉大小的比较评估。

Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):850-857. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7
PMID:32342166
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess left radial artery size, technical feasibility and safety of ldTRA in the anatomical snuffbox for percutaneous image-guided procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed from November 2016 to June 2018 on all patients undergoing ldTRA for interventional radiology procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients (91 female and 196 male), aged 18-94 years (mean age 64 years), were included. 389 procedures were performed which included hepatic chemoembolization (n = 161), selective internal radiation therapy Y-90 mapping (n = 74), selective internal radiation therapy Y-90 administration (n = 48), diagnostic angiography (n = 34), mesenteric and pelvic embolization (n = 59), stent insertion (n = 8) and miscellaneous (n = 5). Mean sonographic measurement of the left radial artery size at the conventional site at the wrist was 2.55 mm (range 1.4-3.3 mm) and 2.34 mm (range 1.4-3.2 mm) at the anatomical snuffbox (p < 0.001). Technical success rate was 100%, a single small hematoma occurred in the first patient (0.3%). 74.2% of patients had follow-up for radial artery patency (mean 46 days, range 0-66 days), which did not reveal radial artery occlusions or pseudoaneurysm formation.

CONCLUSION

The left distal radial artery in the anatomical snuffbox is smaller in comparison with the conventional access site at the wrist. The difference however is small and does not require intentional downsizing of vascular access equipment to facilitate utilization of ldTRA. Assessment of the vessel size is imperative for appropriate equipment selection and optimizing procedural success. This study supports that ldTRA is technically feasible and safe.

摘要

目的

评估经皮影像引导介入放射学操作中解剖鼻烟窝内左桡动脉(ldTRA)的大小、技术可行性和安全性。

材料与方法

本研究为 2016 年 11 月至 2018 年 6 月在所有因介入放射学程序而接受 ldTRA 的患者中进行的回顾性单中心研究。

结果

共纳入 287 例患者(91 例女性,196 例男性),年龄 18-94 岁(平均年龄 64 岁)。共进行了 389 次操作,包括肝动脉化疗栓塞术(n=161)、选择性内部放射治疗 Y-90 映射(n=74)、选择性内部放射治疗 Y-90 给药(n=48)、诊断性血管造影(n=34)、肠系膜和骨盆栓塞术(n=59)、支架置入术(n=8)和其他(n=5)。常规腕部桡动脉大小的超声测量平均值为 2.55mm(范围 1.4-3.3mm),解剖鼻烟窝处为 2.34mm(范围 1.4-3.2mm)(p<0.001)。技术成功率为 100%,首例患者(0.3%)出现单一小血肿。74.2%的患者(平均随访 46 天,范围 0-66 天)桡动脉通畅性,未发现桡动脉闭塞或假性动脉瘤形成。

结论

与腕部常规入路相比,解剖鼻烟窝内左桡动脉(ldTRA)较小。然而,差异很小,不需要对血管通路设备进行有意缩小,以方便使用 ldTRA。评估血管大小对于适当的设备选择和优化程序成功至关重要。本研究支持 ldTRA 具有技术可行性和安全性。

相似文献

1
Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size.左侧远端经桡动脉入路(ldTRA):常规桡动脉远端和桡动脉大小的比较评估。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):850-857. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
The Left Distal Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A US Experience.冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的左桡动脉远端入路:美国经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):786-789. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Evaluation of repeat distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox.解剖学鼻烟壶区重复经桡动脉远端入路的评估
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;27(5):639-643. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20375.
4
Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).经解剖鼻烟窝行左侧远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影(ldTRA)和介入治疗(ldTRI)。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Sep 20;13(7):851-857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention.解剖学鼻烟壶区远端桡动脉入路用于冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的可行性与安全性
Mymensingh Med J. 2019 Jul;28(3):647-654.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Left Distal Transradial Access in Coronary Procedures in the Caribbean.加勒比地区冠状动脉手术中左桡动脉远端入路的有效性和安全性
Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54601. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Feasibility and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Intervention.用于冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉介入的解剖鼻烟壶内桡动脉远端入路的可行性和安全性
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Sep 8;18(2):259-262. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2402.
8
Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis.经解剖鼻烟窝行远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术作为一种更快止血的替代入路。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):651-657. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28155. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
9
Safety and Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Access for Coronary Interventions through Distal Left Radial Route.经远端左侧桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性及可行性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Mar 25;2022:2141524. doi: 10.1155/2022/2141524. eCollection 2022.
10
Early Clinical Experience With Right and Left Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox in 52 Consecutive Patients.52例连续患者在解剖鼻烟壶区行左右桡动脉远端入路的早期临床经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):218-223. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The important role of preoperative ultrasound in the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access.术前超声在经桡动脉远心端途径冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效和安全性中的重要作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 26;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04861-y.
2
Efficacy and safety of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.经桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 18;12:1530995. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1530995. eCollection 2025.
3
Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Access for Noncardiac Intervention.
非心脏介入手术中经桡动脉远心端入路的可行性与安全性
Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2024 Jul 24;9(3):186-191. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2023-0024. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
4
Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox.桡动脉远端入路优化:一项针对解剖鼻烟壶区超声引导下桡动脉特征分析的前瞻性试验。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2081. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182081.
5
Ultrasonographic Characterizations of Radial Artery for Transradial Approach in the Saudi Population: A Pilot Study.沙特人群经桡动脉途径的桡动脉超声特征:一项初步研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65532. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65532. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
French Interventional Radiology Centers' Uptake of Transradial Approach and Outpatient Hepatocellular Carcinoma Intra-Arterial Treatments.法国介入放射学中心经桡动脉入路的采用情况和肝细胞癌的门诊动脉内治疗。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Apr;47(4):432-440. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03578-9. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
The Role of Ultrasound in Accessing the Distal Radial Artery at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Cardiovascular Interventions.超声在心血管介入中经解剖学鼻烟窝处穿刺桡动脉远心端的作用。
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):25. doi: 10.3390/life13010025.
8
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?超声在心血管介入中的应用——桡动脉远端入路:旧瓶装新酒?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.评估和比较解剖学鼻烟窝与常规桡动脉在冠状动脉造影前的远端桡动脉直径。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Jul-Aug;74(4):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Analysis of the Risk Factors Related to the Success Rate of Distal Transradial Artery Access in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.冠心病患者桡动脉远端穿刺成功率相关危险因素分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 13;15:657-663. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S357780. eCollection 2022.