• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠心病患者桡动脉远端穿刺成功率相关危险因素分析

Analysis of the Risk Factors Related to the Success Rate of Distal Transradial Artery Access in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

作者信息

Li Shan-Shan, Li Jian-Ming, Liu Ling-Ling, Liu Wei, Yang Hao, Feng Chun-Guang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, 221009, People's Republic of China.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, 221009, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 13;15:657-663. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S357780. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S357780
PMID:35444479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9013917/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing the success rate of distal transradial access (dTRA) for coronary intervention.

METHODS

A total of 246 patients who underwent either coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention in the Xuzhou Central Hospital were enrolled in this study. Access via the distal radial artery was the first choice for the procedure, and the success rate of this approach was recorded. All patients underwent color Doppler ultrasonography of the distal radial artery at the right anatomical snuff box in order to measure the artery diameter. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the success of the dTRA; 44 patients with unsuccessful punctures were assigned to the observation group and 202 patients with successful punctures acted as the control group. The basic clinical data of the two groups were recorded, and the differences between the two groups with respect to various indices were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to explore the factors influencing the success rate of dTRA.

RESULTS

Of the 246 patients, dTRA was achieved in 202, giving a puncture success rate of 82.11%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the success rate of dTRA was positively correlated with the diameter of the distal radial artery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.381, = 0.005) and hypertension (OR = 2.427, = 0.016), and negatively correlated with female gender (OR = 0.429, = 0.036) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.325, = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that hypertension and distal radial artery diameter have a positive effect on the success rate of dTRA, while diabetes and female gender have a negative effect.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨影响冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉远心端入路(dTRA)成功率的因素。

方法

本研究纳入了徐州中心医院246例行冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。该手术首选经桡动脉远心端入路,并记录该入路的成功率。所有患者均接受右手解剖鼻烟窝处桡动脉远心端的彩色多普勒超声检查,以测量动脉直径。根据dTRA是否成功将患者分为两组;44例穿刺未成功的患者被分配到观察组,202例穿刺成功的患者作为对照组。记录两组的基本临床资料,并评估两组在各项指标上的差异。进行Logistic回归分析以探讨影响dTRA成功率的因素。

结果

在246例患者中,202例成功实现了dTRA,穿刺成功率为82.11%。Logistic回归分析显示,dTRA成功率与桡动脉远心端直径呈正相关(比值比[OR]=3.381,P=0.005)和高血压呈正相关(OR=2.427,P=0.016),与女性性别呈负相关(OR=0.429,P=0.036)以及与糖尿病呈负相关(OR=0.325,P=0.002)。

结论

本研究结果表明,高血压和桡动脉远心端直径对dTRA成功率有积极影响,而糖尿病和女性性别则有负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9013917/5b319d117427/RMHP-15-657-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9013917/40400ea5ef11/RMHP-15-657-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9013917/5b319d117427/RMHP-15-657-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9013917/40400ea5ef11/RMHP-15-657-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a266/9013917/5b319d117427/RMHP-15-657-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Risk Factors Related to the Success Rate of Distal Transradial Artery Access in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.冠心病患者桡动脉远端穿刺成功率相关危险因素分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 13;15:657-663. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S357780. eCollection 2022.
2
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Comparison of the feasibility and safety between distal transradial access and conventional transradial access in patients with acute chest pain: a single-center cohort study using propensity score matching.经倾向评分匹配的单中心队列研究比较急性胸痛患者经远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路的可行性和安全性。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 3;23(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04058-y.
4
Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience.桡动脉远心端入路在冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的有效性和安全性:一项日本多中心经验
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00590-0. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Feasibility and Safety of the Routine Distal Transradial Approach in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Procedures: The ANTARES Randomized Trial.解剖学鼻烟壶区常规桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉介入手术的可行性与安全性:ANTARES随机试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247608.
6
Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Catheterization through Distal Transradial Access: A Single-Center Data.经远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性分析:单中心数据。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 May 16;2023:2560659. doi: 10.1155/2023/2560659. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of Distal Transradial Access in Anatomic Snuffbox Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography.经桡动脉解剖鼻烟窝入路与经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的比较。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Jun 12;23(4):E407-E410. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3041.
8
Distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: A systematic scoping review.经桡动脉远端入路行心导管术:系统范围界定综述。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1381-1389. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28623. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉远端与传统入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的结局比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Comparison of distal transradial approach versus conventional transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective observational study.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉远端入路与传统桡动脉入路的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 14;9(6):e17150. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17150. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The important role of preoperative ultrasound in the efficacy and safety of coronary intervention via distal transradial access.术前超声在经桡动脉远心端途径冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效和安全性中的重要作用。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 26;25(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04861-y.
2
"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.桡动脉远端优先:澳大利亚冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The optimal puncture time point of prolonged occlusion flow-mediated dilatation in radial artery catheterization: a prospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment.基于超声评估的桡动脉远端参考直径及特征。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):109-118. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.685. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size.左侧远端经桡动脉入路(ldTRA):常规桡动脉远端和桡动脉大小的比较评估。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):850-857. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneos coronary intervention: personal experience.
经桡动脉导管介入治疗中延长闭塞血流介导扩张的最佳穿刺时间点:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 8;13(1):21752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49122-0.
4
Factors Affecting Radial Artery Occlusion After Right Transradial Artery Catheterization for Coronary Intervention and Procedures.冠状动脉介入治疗及相关操作经右侧桡动脉导管插入术后影响桡动脉闭塞的因素。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Jun 24;19:525-533. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S403410. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of distal transradial approach versus conventional transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective observational study.冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉远端入路与传统桡动脉入路的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 14;9(6):e17150. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17150. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Real-World Prescribing Patterns for Hypertensive Children in China from 2018 to 2021: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.2018年至2021年中国高血压儿童的真实世界用药模式:一项横断面多中心研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Feb 27;16:287-299. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S392224. eCollection 2023.
7
The Role of Ultrasound in Accessing the Distal Radial Artery at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Cardiovascular Interventions.超声在心血管介入中经解剖学鼻烟窝处穿刺桡动脉远心端的作用。
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):25. doi: 10.3390/life13010025.
8
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?超声在心血管介入中的应用——桡动脉远端入路:旧瓶装新酒?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.
经桡动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:个人经验。
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Sep 5;71(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0006-2.
4
Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization.在冠状动脉导管插入术前,经解剖鼻烟壶采用桡动脉远端入路时测量桡动脉远端直径的重要性。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1615-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01404-2. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients.在日本患者中使用超声评估鼻烟窝处桡动脉远端的直径。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Oct;34(4):312-316. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.鼻烟窝入路时桡动脉远端直径的性别差异。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(5):639-641. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0128.
7
Distal Versus Traditional Radial Approach for Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉造影的远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路对比
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):678-680. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
8
Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).经解剖鼻烟窝行左侧远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影(ldTRA)和介入治疗(ldTRI)。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Sep 20;13(7):851-857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079.
9
The Rotterdam Radial Access Research: Ultrasound-Based Radial Artery Evaluation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Coronary Procedures.鹿特丹桡动脉入路研究:基于超声的桡动脉评估在冠状动脉诊断和治疗中的应用
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e003129. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003129.
10
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.