• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症幸存者对电子健康支持的身体活动干预的认知:混合方法研究

Perceptions of eHealth-Enabled Physical Activity Interventions Among Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Haberlin Ciaran, O' Donnell Dearbhaile M, Moran Jonathan, Broderick Julie

机构信息

Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Medical Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2020 Apr 28;6(1):e16469. doi: 10.2196/16469.

DOI:10.2196/16469
PMID:32343259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7218594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving adequate levels of physical activity (PA) is especially important for cancer survivors to mitigate the side effects of cancer and its treatment as well as for other health benefits. Electronic health (eHealth)-based PA interventions may offer feasible alternatives to traditionally delivered programs and optimize physical recovery after a cancer diagnosis, but perspectives of cancer survivors on this new delivery medium have not been extensively explored.

OBJECTIVE

The overall aim was to explore participants' perspectives of eHealth-enabled PA interventions to inform the design of a future intervention among cancer survivors.

METHODS

The study took place in a designated cancer center in Dublin, Ireland. A preceding questionnaire-based study was conducted primarily to establish interest in participating in subsequent eHealth-based studies. A follow-on focus group study was conducted to explore the concept of eHealth-based PA interventions for cancer survivors. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The questionnaire-based study (N=102) indicated that participants had a high level of interest in participating in follow-on eHealth-based studies. The focus group study (n=23) indicated that, despite some trepidation, overall positivity was expressed by participants toward the concept of eHealth-based PA interventions. Four themes were generated: (1) Health impact, including PA as a barrier and as a motivating factor, (2) Education needs, which emphasized the need for integrated information about PA and to increase technical literacy, (3) Goal setting, which should be integrated within the technical specification as a motivating factor, and (4) Support needs, as well as the importance of personalized human interaction, in tandem with technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative research at the pretrial phase adds value to the design of a complex intervention and is especially useful in an area such as eHealth. The findings highlighted an interest in participating in eHealth-focused research as well as barriers, training needs, and key design features that can be applied to optimize the design of future eHealth-based PA interventions in cancer.

摘要

背景

达到足够的身体活动水平对癌症幸存者减轻癌症及其治疗的副作用以及获得其他健康益处尤为重要。基于电子健康(eHealth)的身体活动干预可能为传统提供的项目提供可行的替代方案,并优化癌症诊断后的身体恢复,但癌症幸存者对这种新的交付媒介的看法尚未得到广泛探讨。

目的

总体目标是探索参与者对基于eHealth的身体活动干预的看法,以为未来癌症幸存者干预措施的设计提供信息。

方法

该研究在爱尔兰都柏林的一个指定癌症中心进行。之前进行了一项基于问卷的研究,主要是为了确定参与后续基于eHealth研究的兴趣。随后进行了焦点小组研究,以探讨针对癌症幸存者的基于eHealth的身体活动干预概念。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

基于问卷的研究(N = 102)表明,参与者对参与后续基于eHealth的研究兴趣浓厚。焦点小组研究(n = 23)表明尽管有些担忧,但参与者对基于eHealth的身体活动干预概念总体上持积极态度。产生了四个主题:(1)健康影响,包括身体活动是障碍还是激励因素;(2)教育需求,强调需要关于身体活动的综合信息并提高技术素养;(3)目标设定,应作为激励因素纳入技术规范;(4)支持需求,以及个性化人际互动与技术相结合的重要性。

结论

审前阶段的定性研究为复杂干预措施的设计增添价值,在eHealth等领域尤其有用。研究结果突出了参与以eHealth为重点的研究的兴趣以及障碍、培训需求和关键设计特征,可应用这些来优化未来针对癌症患者的基于eHealth的身体活动干预措施的设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/7218594/cbfbcaf07149/cancer_v6i1e16469_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/7218594/cbfbcaf07149/cancer_v6i1e16469_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2169/7218594/cbfbcaf07149/cancer_v6i1e16469_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of eHealth-Enabled Physical Activity Interventions Among Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.癌症幸存者对电子健康支持的身体活动干预的认知:混合方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2020 Apr 28;6(1):e16469. doi: 10.2196/16469.
2
Breast Cancer Survivors' Perspectives on Motivational and Personalization Strategies in Mobile App-Based Physical Activity Coaching Interventions: Qualitative Study.基于移动应用的身体活动教练干预中乳腺癌幸存者对动机和个性化策略的观点:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e18867. doi: 10.2196/18867.
3
The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review.电子健康在促进癌症幸存者身体活动中的应用:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct;26(10):3323-3336. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4305-z. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
4
Current Evidence and Directions for Future Research in eHealth Physical Activity Interventions for Adults Affected by Cancer: Systematic Review.针对受癌症影响的成年人的电子健康身体活动干预措施的当前证据及未来研究方向:系统综述
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 20;7(3):e28852. doi: 10.2196/28852.
5
Perceptions of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Their Physiotherapists Regarding the Use of an eHealth Intervention.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者及其物理治疗师对使用电子健康干预措施的看法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Sep 19;4(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7196.
6
Features That Middle-aged and Older Cancer Survivors Want in Web-Based Healthy Lifestyle Interventions: Qualitative Descriptive Study.中年及老年癌症幸存者对基于网络的健康生活方式干预措施的期望:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Oct 6;7(4):e26226. doi: 10.2196/26226.
7
Primary Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Developing an eHealth Tool for Physical Activity Counselling: A Qualitative Study.初级卫生保健提供者对开发用于身体活动咨询的电子健康工具的看法:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 10;14:321-333. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S298390. eCollection 2021.
8
Results of MyPlan 2.0 on Physical Activity in Older Belgian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.MyPlan 2.0对比利时老年成年人身体活动影响的研究结果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 7;21(10):e13219. doi: 10.2196/13219.
9
A Systematic Review of Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions to improve physical activity in patients with breast cancer.电子健康 (eHealth) 干预措施改善乳腺癌患者身体活动的系统评价
Breast Cancer. 2020 Jan;27(1):25-46. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00982-3. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Assessment of Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Using a Publicly Available Physical Activity Mobile Application.癌症幸存者使用一款公开可用的体育活动移动应用程序的体验评估
JMIR Cancer. 2016 May 31;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5380.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequities to the access to and use of telemedicine among cancer patients in Europe: a scoping review.欧洲癌症患者在远程医疗获取和使用方面的不平等:一项范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1483706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1483706. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of Covid-19 restrictions in Ireland on symptom severity in mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.爱尔兰新冠疫情限制措施对轻至中度帕金森病症状严重程度的影响。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan;86(1):20-25. doi: 10.1177/03080226221120477.
3
Perspectives on Ease of Use and Value of a Self-Monitoring Application to Support Physical Activity Maintenance among Individuals Living with and beyond Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.使用移动应用程序和短信作为身心健康干预措施:系统评价。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2018 Oct;16(4):456-465. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.16406. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Experiences of Using Publicly Available Physical Activity Mobile Apps: Qualitative Study.乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者使用公共可用的体育活动移动应用程序的体验:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 4;7(1):e10918. doi: 10.2196/10918.
3
The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review.
个体在癌症治疗期间及之后使用自我监测应用程序以维持身体活动:易用性和价值的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Mar 19;31(3):1572-1587. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31030120.
4
Characteristics of Participants and Nonparticipants in a Blended Internet-Based Physical Activity Trial for Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors: Cross-sectional Study.一项针对乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者的基于互联网的混合式体育活动试验中参与者和非参与者的特征:横断面研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Oct 5;7(4):e25464. doi: 10.2196/25464.
5
Usability, Acceptability, and Safety Analysis of a Computer-Tailored Web-Based Exercise Intervention (ExerciseGuide) for Individuals With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Multi-Methods Laboratory-Based Study.针对转移性前列腺癌患者的计算机定制化网络运动干预(ExerciseGuide)的可用性、可接受性及安全性分析:基于多方法的实验室研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Jul 28;7(3):e28370. doi: 10.2196/28370.
电子健康在促进癌症幸存者身体活动中的应用:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct;26(10):3323-3336. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4305-z. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
4
Support needs for medication use and the suitability of eHealth technologies to address these needs: a focus group study of older patients with rheumatoid arthritis.药物使用的支持需求以及电子健康技术满足这些需求的适用性:一项针对老年类风湿性关节炎患者的焦点小组研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Mar 7;12:349-358. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S152759. eCollection 2018.
5
Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.癌症幸存者的自我管理干预措施:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 May;26(5):1585-1595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3999-7. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Recruitment, adherence, and retention of endometrial cancer survivors in a behavioural lifestyle programme: the Diet and Exercise in Uterine Cancer Survivors (DEUS) parallel randomised pilot trial.子宫内膜癌幸存者参与行为生活方式项目的招募、依从性和留存率:子宫癌幸存者的饮食与运动(DEUS)平行随机试点试验
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 8;7(10):e018015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018015.
7
Breast cancer survivors' preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions.乳腺癌幸存者对技术支持的运动干预的偏好。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3243-3252. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3735-3. Epub 2017 May 3.
8
Interest in Health Behavior Intervention Delivery Modalities Among Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.癌症幸存者对健康行为干预实施方式的兴趣:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2016 Feb 11;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5247.
9
Special aspects of social support: Qualitative analysis of oncologic rehabilitation through a belly dancing peer support group.社会支持的特殊方面:通过肚皮舞同伴支持小组对肿瘤康复进行的定性分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12656. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review.自我管理手机和平板应用程序在长期疾病管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.