Suppr超能文献

阿莫西林加小檗碱与四环素加呋喃唑酮四联疗法补救治疗幽门螺杆菌的随机、多中心、非劣效性研究。

A randomized, multicenter and noninferiority study of amoxicillin plus berberine vs tetracycline plus furazolidone in quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori rescue treatment.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital of the Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2020 May;21(5):256-263. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12870. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is closely associated with gastric ulcers and gastric adenocarcinomas. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a quadruple regimen with amoxicillin plus berberine vs tetracycline plus furazolidone in rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial. Patients with previous treatment failures recruited from five centers were randomized (1:1) to receive a regimen with esomeprazole and bismuth plus either berberine and amoxicillin (the BA group) or tetracycline and furazolidone (the TF group) for 14 days. Their H. pylori infection status was confirmed 4-8 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome was the eradication rate. The secondary outcomes included the rates of symptom improvement, compliance, and adverse events. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03609892).

RESULTS

Altogether 658 participants were consecutively enrolled. An intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the two regimens achieved a similar eradication rate (76.3% vs 77.5%; P = 0.781). The per-protocol analysis reached a similar result (81.5% vs 85.0%; P = 0.278). The eradication rate reached in the BA group was greater than the pre-established margin of noninferiority, at -10% (the lower bounds of the 95% CI were -7.66% and -9.43%, respectively). The rate of adverse events was lower for the BA group than the TF group (18.5% vs 26.1%, P = 0.024). Rates of compliance and symptom improvement were similar for the two therapies.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of both regimens in rescue treatment for H. pylori eradication was satisfactory, 14-day BA-based quadruple therapy is noninferior to the TF-based therapy.

摘要

目的

幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染与胃溃疡和胃腺癌密切相关。我们旨在评估阿莫西林加小檗碱与四环素加呋喃唑酮联合应用于 H. pylori 补救治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们进行了一项随机、开放标签、多中心、非劣效性试验。从 5 个中心招募了既往治疗失败的患者,将其随机(1:1)分为埃索美拉唑和铋剂加小檗碱和阿莫西林(BA 组)或四环素和呋喃唑酮(TF 组)的治疗组,疗程为 14 天。治疗后 4-8 周确认 H. pylori 感染状态。主要结局是根除率。次要结局包括症状改善率、依从性和不良事件发生率。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT03609892)。

结果

共纳入 658 名连续患者。意向治疗分析表明,两种方案的根除率相似(76.3% vs 77.5%;P = 0.781)。按方案分析也得出了类似的结果(81.5% vs 85.0%;P = 0.278)。BA 组的根除率高于预先设定的非劣效性边界,为-10%(95%CI 的下限分别为-7.66%和-9.43%)。BA 组的不良事件发生率低于 TF 组(18.5% vs 26.1%,P = 0.024)。两种治疗的依从率和症状改善率相似。

结论

两种方案在 H. pylori 补救治疗中的疗效均令人满意,14 天 BA 为基础的四联疗法与 TF 为基础的疗法等效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68e/7383804/61aa6cee07f0/CDD-21-256-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验