The First People's Hospital of Chongqing Liang Jiang New Area, Chongqing, China.
Institute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore; The China-Singapore (Chongqing) Demonstration Initiative on Strategic Connectivity Think Tank, Chongqing 400043, China.
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.069. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
This study aimed to assess and compare the immediate stress and psychological impact experienced by people with and without psychiatric illnesses during the peak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic with strict lockdown measures. Seventy-six psychiatric patients and 109 healthy control subjects were recruited from Chongqing, China and completed a survey on demographic data, physical symptoms during the past 14 days and a range of psychiatric symptoms using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). IES-R measures PTSD symptoms in survivorship after an event. DASS-21 is based on tripartite model of psychopathology that comprise a general distress construct with distinct characteristics. The mean IES-R, DASS-21 anxiety, depression and stress subscale and ISI scores were higher in psychiatric patients than healthy controls (p < 0.001). Serious worries about their physical health, anger and impulsivity and intense suicidal ideation were significantly higher in psychiatric patients than healthy controls (p < 0.05). More than one-third of psychiatric patients might fulfil the diagnostic criteria post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). More than one-quarter of psychiatric patients suffered from moderately severe to severe insomnia. Respondents who reported no change, poor or worse physical health status and had a psychiatric illness were significantly more likely to have higher mean IES-R, DASS depression, anxiety and stress subscale scores and ISI scores (p < 0.05). This study confirms the severity of negative psychological impact on psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 epidemic with strict lockdown measures. Understanding the psychological impact on psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to provide insight into how to develop a new immunopsychiatry service. Further research is required to compare pro-inflammatory cytokines between psychiatric patients and healthy controls during the pandemic.
本研究旨在评估和比较在严格封锁措施下,患有和不患有精神疾病的人在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情高峰期所经历的即时压力和心理影响。从中国重庆招募了 76 名精神科患者和 109 名健康对照者,他们完成了一项关于人口统计学数据、过去 14 天内的身体症状以及使用修订后的事件影响量表(IES-R)、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)和失眠严重程度指数(ISI)评估的一系列精神症状的调查。IES-R 测量事件后生存者的创伤后应激障碍症状。DASS-21 基于精神病理学的三分模型,包括具有独特特征的一般困扰结构。与健康对照组相比,精神科患者的 IES-R、DASS-21 焦虑、抑郁和压力分量表和 ISI 评分均较高(p<0.001)。严重担心自己的身体健康、愤怒和冲动以及强烈的自杀意念在精神科患者中明显高于健康对照组(p<0.05)。超过三分之一的精神科患者可能符合创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准。超过四分之一的精神科患者患有中度至重度失眠。报告身体状况无变化、较差或更差且患有精神疾病的受访者,其 IES-R、DASS 抑郁、焦虑和压力分量表评分和 ISI 评分均显著更高(p<0.05)。这项研究证实了在严格封锁措施下 COVID-19 疫情对精神科患者产生的严重负面影响。了解 COVID-19 大流行期间对精神科患者的心理影响有可能为如何制定新的免疫精神病学服务提供思路。需要进一步研究来比较大流行期间精神科患者和健康对照组之间的促炎细胞因子。