Cushman L A, Como P G, Booth H, Caine E D
University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, NY.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988 Dec;10(6):685-92. doi: 10.1080/01688638808402807.
Two tasks were administered to 13 mildly to moderately impaired subjects who met clinical research criteria for AD, and 17 controls matched for age and education. In the first task, subjects were administered a cued recall test (Buschke, 1984). AD subjects were found to be variably impaired in their ability to perform the initial stimulus-processing procedure, which involved matching cues with referents. The subsequent cued recall test did not typically facilitate performance. In the second task, subjects were administered a release from proactive interference (PI) paradigm consisting of semantically related and unrelated word lists. AD subjects did not develop the expected proactive interference effect for the semantically related words or show a resulting "release from PI" on related word list recall compared to normal controls. Results are discussed in terms of the role of semantic processing in episodic memory tasks.
对13名符合AD临床研究标准的轻度至中度受损受试者以及17名年龄和教育程度相匹配的对照组进行了两项任务。在第一项任务中,对受试者进行了线索回忆测试(Buschke,1984)。发现AD受试者在执行初始刺激处理程序(包括将线索与参照对象匹配)的能力上存在不同程度的受损。随后的线索回忆测试通常并未促进表现。在第二项任务中,对受试者进行了由语义相关和不相关单词列表组成的主动干扰(PI)范式下的释放测试。与正常对照组相比,AD受试者对语义相关单词未产生预期的主动干扰效应,并且在相关单词列表回忆中未表现出由此产生的“PI释放”。从语义处理在情景记忆任务中的作用方面对结果进行了讨论。