Epstein Nancy E
Adjunct Clinical Professor of Neurological Surgery School of Medicine State University of N.Y. at Stony Brook.
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Apr 18;11:70. doi: 10.25259/SNI_113_2020. eCollection 2020.
Extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIF) and minimally invasive (MI) XLIF theoretically offer wide access to the lumbar disc space. The theoretical advantages of XLIF include; minimally disturbing surrounding structures (e.g. neural, vascular, soft-tissue), while offering stability. In addition to the well-known increased frequency of neurological deficits attributed to XLIF, here we explored how often major vascular injures occur with XLIF/MI XLIF procedures.
In 13 XLIF/MI XLIF studies, we evaluated the frequency of major vascular injuries.
The studies citing the different frequencies of vascular injuries associated with XLIF/MI XLIF were broken down into three categories. Of the 5 small and larger case series, involving a total of 6,732 patients (e.g. range of 12 to 4,607 patients/study), the incidence of vascular injuries ranged from 0% (3 studies) up to 0.4%. Three case reports presented major vascular injuries attributed to XLIF/MI XLIF. Two involved the L4-L5 level. The three complications included: one fatal injury, one, a retroperitoneal hematoma with hemorrhagic shock, and one major vascular injury. For the 5 review articles, major vascular complications were just discussed in 2, one study cited 3 specific major vascular injuries (e.g. 1 fatal, 1 life threating, and 1 lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm requiring embolization), while 2 other studies stated the frequency of these injuries was 0.4% for XLIF, and 1.7 % for OLIF (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion).
According to 5 small and larger case series, 3 case reports, and 5 review articles, the incidence of major vascular injuries occurring during XLIF/MI XLIF ranges from 0 to 0.03% to 0.4%.
极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)和微创(MI)XLIF理论上能广泛进入腰椎间盘间隙。XLIF的理论优势包括:对周围结构(如神经、血管、软组织)干扰最小,同时提供稳定性。除了XLIF导致神经功能缺损频率增加这一众所周知的情况外,我们在此探讨了XLIF/MI XLIF手术中主要血管损伤的发生频率。
在13项XLIF/MI XLIF研究中,我们评估了主要血管损伤的频率。
引用与XLIF/MI XLIF相关的不同血管损伤频率的研究分为三类。在5个大小不等的病例系列中,总共涉及6732例患者(例如每个研究的患者范围为12至4607例),血管损伤的发生率从0%(3项研究)到0.4%不等。3例病例报告呈现了XLIF/MI XLIF导致的主要血管损伤。其中2例涉及L4-L5节段。这3例并发症包括:1例致命伤、1例伴有失血性休克的腹膜后血肿和1例主要血管损伤。对于5篇综述文章,仅2篇讨论了主要血管并发症,1项研究引用了3例特定的主要血管损伤(例如1例致命伤、1例危及生命伤和1例需要栓塞的腰动脉假性动脉瘤),而另外2项研究指出这些损伤的频率对于XLIF为0.4%,对于斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)为1.7%。
根据5个大小不等的病例系列、3例病例报告和5篇综述文章,XLIF/MI XLIF期间发生主要血管损伤的发生率为0至0.03%至0.4%。