Suppr超能文献

极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)相关的主要血管损伤发生率。

Incidence of Major Vascular Injuries with Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF).

作者信息

Epstein Nancy E

机构信息

Adjunct Clinical Professor of Neurological Surgery School of Medicine State University of N.Y. at Stony Brook.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Apr 18;11:70. doi: 10.25259/SNI_113_2020. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIF) and minimally invasive (MI) XLIF theoretically offer wide access to the lumbar disc space. The theoretical advantages of XLIF include; minimally disturbing surrounding structures (e.g. neural, vascular, soft-tissue), while offering stability. In addition to the well-known increased frequency of neurological deficits attributed to XLIF, here we explored how often major vascular injures occur with XLIF/MI XLIF procedures.

METHODS

In 13 XLIF/MI XLIF studies, we evaluated the frequency of major vascular injuries.

RESULTS

The studies citing the different frequencies of vascular injuries associated with XLIF/MI XLIF were broken down into three categories. Of the 5 small and larger case series, involving a total of 6,732 patients (e.g. range of 12 to 4,607 patients/study), the incidence of vascular injuries ranged from 0% (3 studies) up to 0.4%. Three case reports presented major vascular injuries attributed to XLIF/MI XLIF. Two involved the L4-L5 level. The three complications included: one fatal injury, one, a retroperitoneal hematoma with hemorrhagic shock, and one major vascular injury. For the 5 review articles, major vascular complications were just discussed in 2, one study cited 3 specific major vascular injuries (e.g. 1 fatal, 1 life threating, and 1 lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm requiring embolization), while 2 other studies stated the frequency of these injuries was 0.4% for XLIF, and 1.7 % for OLIF (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion).

CONCLUSIONS

According to 5 small and larger case series, 3 case reports, and 5 review articles, the incidence of major vascular injuries occurring during XLIF/MI XLIF ranges from 0 to 0.03% to 0.4%.

摘要

背景

极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)和微创(MI)XLIF理论上能广泛进入腰椎间盘间隙。XLIF的理论优势包括:对周围结构(如神经、血管、软组织)干扰最小,同时提供稳定性。除了XLIF导致神经功能缺损频率增加这一众所周知的情况外,我们在此探讨了XLIF/MI XLIF手术中主要血管损伤的发生频率。

方法

在13项XLIF/MI XLIF研究中,我们评估了主要血管损伤的频率。

结果

引用与XLIF/MI XLIF相关的不同血管损伤频率的研究分为三类。在5个大小不等的病例系列中,总共涉及6732例患者(例如每个研究的患者范围为12至4607例),血管损伤的发生率从0%(3项研究)到0.4%不等。3例病例报告呈现了XLIF/MI XLIF导致的主要血管损伤。其中2例涉及L4-L5节段。这3例并发症包括:1例致命伤、1例伴有失血性休克的腹膜后血肿和1例主要血管损伤。对于5篇综述文章,仅2篇讨论了主要血管并发症,1项研究引用了3例特定的主要血管损伤(例如1例致命伤、1例危及生命伤和1例需要栓塞的腰动脉假性动脉瘤),而另外2项研究指出这些损伤的频率对于XLIF为0.4%,对于斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)为1.7%。

结论

根据5个大小不等的病例系列、3例病例报告和5篇综述文章,XLIF/MI XLIF期间发生主要血管损伤的发生率为0至0.03%至0.4%。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.腰大肌外侧椎间融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S7-S18. doi: 10.14444/8711.
7
[Transmuscular approach (XLIF technique) for anterior surgery of the lumbar spine].[经肌肉入路(XLIF技术)用于腰椎前路手术]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Apr;35(2):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00799-6. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

7
Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?极外侧腰椎椎间融合术:弊端是否大于益处?
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191079. eCollection 2016.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验