Suppr超能文献

动物研究在预测临床试验中毒性方面的局限性:第2部分:临床前试验中使用动物的潜在替代方法。

Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials: Part 2: Potential Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Preclinical Trials.

作者信息

Van Norman Gail A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Apr;5(4):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

Abstract

Dramatically rising costs in drug development are in large part because of the high failure rates in clinical phase trials. The poor correlation of animal studies to human toxicity and efficacy have led many developers to question the value of requiring animal studies in determining which drugs should enter in-human trials. Part 1 of this 2-part series examined some of the data regarding the lack of concordance between animal toxicity studies and human trials, as well as some of the potential reasons behind it. This second part of the series focuses on some alternatives to animal trials (hereafter referred to as animal research) as well as current regulatory discussions and developments regarding such alternatives.

摘要

药物研发成本的急剧上升在很大程度上是由于临床试验的高失败率。动物研究与人体毒性和疗效之间的相关性较差,这使得许多研发人员质疑在确定哪些药物应进入人体试验时进行动物研究的价值。这个两部分系列文章的第一部分探讨了一些关于动物毒性研究与人体试验之间缺乏一致性的数据,以及其背后的一些潜在原因。本系列文章的第二部分重点关注动物试验(以下简称动物研究)的一些替代方法,以及目前关于此类替代方法的监管讨论和进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d74/7188868/6ad088f3bed6/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验