Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, 4-11-1 Izumi-Honcyo, Komae, Tokyo, 201-8601, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Breast Cancer. 2020 Sep;27(5):861-870. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01082-3. Epub 2020 May 3.
Recent improvement of machinery evaluation for the skin changes in various therapies enabled us to evaluate fine changes quantitatively. In this study, we performed evaluation of the changes in radiation dermatitis (RD) using quantitative and qualitative methods, and verified the validity of the conventional qualitative assessment for clinical use.
Forty-three breast cancer patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy to whole breast after breast-conserving surgery. Erythema, pigmentation and skin dryness were evaluated qualitatively, and biophysical parameters of RD were measured using a Multi-Display Device MDD4 with a Corneometer for capacitance, a Tewameter for transepidermal water loss (TEWL), a Mexameter for erythema index and melanin index. Measurements were performed periodically until 1 year.
The quantitative manifestations developed serially from skin erythema followed by dryness and pigmentation. Quantitative measurements detected the effects of irradiation earlier than that of qualitative indices. However, the grades of the domains in RD by qualitative and quantitative assessment showed similar time courses and peak periods. However, no significant correlation was observed between the skin dryness grade and skin barrier function. In contrast to serial increase in pigmentation grades, melanin index showed initial decrease followed by marked increase with significant correlation with pigmentation grades.
Subjectively and objectively measured results of RD were almost similar course and peak points through the study. Therefore, validity of the conventional qualitative scoring for RD is confirmed by the present quantitative assessments. Instrumental evaluations revealed the presence of modest inflammatory changes before radiotherapy and long-lasting skin dryness, suggesting indication of intervention for RD.
最近,各种疗法中皮肤变化的机械评估得到了改进,使我们能够定量评估细微变化。在这项研究中,我们使用定量和定性方法评估了放射性皮炎 (RD) 的变化,并验证了常规定性评估在临床应用中的有效性。
43 名乳腺癌患者在保乳手术后接受常规分割放疗全乳。采用定性方法评估红斑、色素沉着和皮肤干燥,并用多显示设备 MDD4 及其电容式皮肤水分计 Corneometer、经表皮水分丢失 (TEWL) 仪 Tewameter、红斑指数和黑色素指数仪 Mexameter 测量 RD 的生物物理参数。定期进行测量,直到 1 年。
定量表现从皮肤红斑开始,然后是干燥和色素沉着,呈序列性发展。定量测量比定性指标更早地检测到照射的影响。然而,定性和定量评估的 RD 域的等级显示出相似的时间过程和峰值期。然而,皮肤干燥等级与皮肤屏障功能之间没有观察到显著相关性。与色素沉着等级的连续增加相反,黑色素指数最初下降,随后显著增加,并与色素沉着等级有显著相关性。
通过本研究,RD 的主观和客观测量结果几乎具有相似的过程和峰值点。因此,常规定性评分对 RD 的有效性得到了本定量评估的证实。仪器评估显示,放疗前存在适度的炎症变化和持久的皮肤干燥,提示需要干预 RD。