Value Evidence Outcomes Department, Japan Development Division, GlaxoSmithKline K.K, Tokyo, Japan.
Value Evidence and Outcomes Department, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jun;36(6):1049-1057. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1763937. Epub 2020 May 14.
To help optimize triple therapy use, treatment patterns and disease burden were investigated in patients in Japan with persistent asthma who initiated multi-inhaler triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist; ICS/LABA/LAMA). This retrospective, observational cohort study using health insurance claims data included adults with persistent asthma who initiated triple therapy in 2016. Patients who were prescribed ICS/LABA in 2016 were included as an ICS/LABA-matched cohort. Patients were stratified into those with asthma only and those with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) codes (asthma-COPD overlap [ACO]). Patient data from 1-year prior to 1 year post index date were analyzed. For patients with asthma only in the triple therapy and ICS/LABA cohorts, baseline demographics were similar. A higher proportion of the triple-therapy cohort than the ICS/LABA cohort was receiving high-dose ICS at index (68.2% and 27.6%, respectively), and had experienced an exacerbation in the last year (64.0% and 29.4%, respectively). The proportion of patients with asthma only who developed any exacerbation was lower in the year following initiation of triple therapy compared with the year prior to initiation of triple therapy (45.8% vs 64.0%, respectively). For asthma only patients receiving triple therapy, the mean (standard deviation) proportion of days covered and medication possession ratio was 0.51 (0.36) and 0.86 (0.16), respectively. Similar trends were seen in patients with ACO in the triple-therapy and ICS/LABA cohorts. Evidence from this study may serve as a reference for the use of inhaled triple therapy for asthma.
为了帮助优化三联疗法的使用,本研究调查了日本持续哮喘患者起始多吸入器三联疗法(吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂;ICS/LABA/LAMA)的治疗模式和疾病负担。这项回顾性、观察性队列研究使用了医疗保险索赔数据,纳入了 2016 年起始三联疗法的成年持续性哮喘患者。2016 年被处方 ICS/LABA 的患者被纳入 ICS/LABA 匹配队列。患者分为仅哮喘患者和哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)编码(哮喘-COPD 重叠[ACO])患者。分析了索引日期前 1 年至索引日期后 1 年的患者数据。在三联疗法和 ICS/LABA 队列中,仅哮喘患者的基线人口统计学特征相似。起始三联疗法的患者中,高剂量 ICS 的比例高于 ICS/LABA 队列(分别为 68.2%和 27.6%),并且在过去 1 年中经历过加重(分别为 64.0%和 29.4%)。与起始三联疗法前一年相比,起始三联疗法后一年仅哮喘患者发生任何加重的比例较低(分别为 45.8%和 64.0%)。对于起始三联疗法的仅哮喘患者,覆盖天数和药物利用率的平均值(标准差)分别为 0.51(0.36)和 0.86(0.16)。在三联疗法和 ICS/LABA 队列中的 ACO 患者中也观察到了类似的趋势。这项研究的证据可以作为吸入性三联疗法治疗哮喘的参考。