Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford , West Hartford, CT, USA.
School of Health Sciences, Oakland University , Rochester, MI, USA.
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 Sep;28(4):191-200. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1758520. Epub 2020 May 4.
A recent AAOMPT position paper was published that opposed the use of the term 'degenerative disc disease' (DDD), in large part because it appears to be a common age-related finding. While common, there are significant physiologic and biomechanical changes that occur as a result of discogenic degeneration, which are relevant to consider during the practice of manual therapy.
A narrative review provides an overview of these considerations, including a historical perspective of discogenic instability, the role of the disc as a pain generator, the basic science of a combined biomechanical and physiologic cycle of degeneration and subsequent discogenic instability, the influence of rotation on the degenerative segment, the implications of these factors for manual therapy practice, and a perspective on an evidence-based treatment approach to patients with concurrent low back pain and discogenic degeneration.
As we consider the role of imaging findings such as DDD, we pose the following question: Do our manual interventions reflect the scientifically proven biomechanical aspects of DDD, or have we chosen to ignore the helpful science as we discard the harmful diagnostic label?
最近发表了一份 AAOMPT 立场文件,反对使用“退行性椎间盘疾病”(DDD)这一术语,主要是因为它似乎是一种常见的与年龄相关的发现。虽然很常见,但椎间盘退变会导致明显的生理和生物力学变化,这些变化在手法治疗中需要考虑。
叙述性综述提供了对这些考虑因素的概述,包括椎间盘不稳定的历史观点、椎间盘作为疼痛发生器的作用、退变和随后的椎间盘不稳定的综合生物力学和生理循环的基础科学、旋转对退变节段的影响、这些因素对手法治疗实践的影响,以及对伴有下腰痛和椎间盘退变的患者进行循证治疗方法的观点。
当我们考虑影像学发现(如 DDD)的作用时,我们提出了以下问题:我们的手法干预是否反映了 DDD 的经过科学证实的生物力学方面,或者我们是否选择忽略有帮助的科学,同时摒弃有害的诊断标签?