Mehyar Fahed, Santos Marcio, Wilson Sara E, Staggs Vincent S, Sharma Neena K
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Department of Physical Therapy, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington.
J Chiropr Med. 2017 Dec;16(4):271-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of grade IV lumbar mobilization on the activity/contraction of erector spinae (ES) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles in healthy people.
A randomized, repeated-measures design was used. Sixteen healthy subjects attended 3 testing sessions with a different intervention in each session (no intervention, grade IV central lumbar mobilization at L4, and placebo/light touch). Lying in a prone position, subjects lifted a light weight with their right arm while ultrasound images of LM and surface electromyography signals of ES were captured before and immediately after application of the intervention in the session. The contraction of LM was calculated from US images, and the root mean square was calculated from the electromyography signals of ES and used as outcome measures.
A significant difference was found in LM contraction between the placebo and mobilization intervention (difference = 0.04, = .02). There was no difference for the root mean square of electromyography signals between the interventions.
The significant difference in LM contraction was small and may not have clinical significance. Lumbar mobilization did not change the activity of ES in healthy people. Future studies with larger samples are needed to confirm our findings and to investigate the effect of mobilization on back muscles in people with low back pain.
本研究旨在探讨IV级腰椎松动术对健康人群竖脊肌(ES)和腰多裂肌(LM)活动/收缩的影响。
采用随机重复测量设计。16名健康受试者参加3次测试,每次测试采用不同的干预措施(无干预、L4节段IV级腰椎中央松动术、安慰剂/轻触)。受试者俯卧位,右臂举起轻重量物体,在每次测试干预前后分别采集LM的超声图像和ES的表面肌电图信号。根据超声图像计算LM的收缩情况,根据ES的肌电图信号计算均方根,并将其作为结果指标。
安慰剂组和松动术干预组之间的LM收缩存在显著差异(差异 = 0.04,P =.02)。各干预组之间肌电图信号的均方根无差异。
LM收缩的显著差异较小,可能无临床意义。腰椎松动术未改变健康人群ES的活动。需要进一步开展大样本研究以证实我们的发现,并探讨松动术对腰痛患者背部肌肉的影响。