Suppr超能文献

传统的持筷方式夹取有什么意义?

What is the significance of the traditional pinching mode of holding chopsticks?

机构信息

Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 2638522, Japan.

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Physiol Anthropol. 2020 May 4;39(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40101-020-00223-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of manipulation mode of chopsticks on the learning process, using assessment of task performance and electromyography, and to understand the significance of the traditional manipulation mode from the viewpoint of physiological anthropology. Previous studies have described two modes of manipulating chopsticks, the traditional pincers-pinching mode and the scissors-pinching mode.

METHODS

We conducted experiments with two conditions of holding chopsticks: scissors mode and pincers mode. Eight subjects participated and were assigned to these modes, and they learned handling tasks in their assigned mode for 5 days with the non-dominant hand. We measured task execution times and conducted electromyography of the following muscles: first dorsalis interosseus, flexor pollicis brevis, flexor digiti minimi brevis, flexor digitorum superficialis, and extensor digitorum.

RESULTS

The training effects were found in each mode. The pincers mode showed significantly shorter task performance times than did scissors mode. On electromyography, significant increases in activity of flexor digiti minimi brevis and tended an increase in flexor digitorum superficialis and a decrease in extensor digitorum occurred in pincers mode but not in scissors mode.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional mode of holding chopsticks was associated with not only high task performance but also an advantage in terms of learning motor control.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过任务绩效评估和肌电图,阐明筷子操作模式对学习过程的影响,并从生理人类学的角度理解传统操作模式的意义。之前的研究已经描述了两种筷子操作模式,传统的钳子夹取模式和剪刀夹取模式。

方法

我们进行了两种持筷方式的实验:剪刀模式和钳子模式。8 名受试者参与,并被分配到这些模式中,他们用非优势手在其分配的模式下学习处理任务 5 天。我们测量了任务执行时间,并对以下肌肉进行肌电图测量:第一骨间背侧肌、拇指短屈肌、小指短屈肌、指浅屈肌和指伸肌。

结果

在每种模式下都发现了训练效果。钳子模式的任务表现时间明显短于剪刀模式。在肌电图方面,钳子模式下小指短屈肌和指浅屈肌的活动显著增加,而指伸肌的活动则减少,而剪刀模式下则没有这种情况。

结论

传统的持筷方式不仅与高任务表现相关,而且在运动控制学习方面也具有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a542/7197175/3653c2f7d5b0/40101_2020_223_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验