• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测急性胆源性胰腺炎中胆总管结石残留的床边评分

Bedside score predicting retained common bile duct stone in acute biliary pancreatitis.

作者信息

Khoury Tawfik, Kadah Anas, Mahamid Mahmud, Mari Amir, Sbeit Wisam

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2020 Apr 26;8(8):1414-1423. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414.

DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414
PMID:32368534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7190963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retained common bile duct (CBD) stone after an acute episode of biliary pancreatitis is of paramount importance since stone extraction is mandatory.

AIM

To generate a simple non-invasive score to predict the presence of CBD stone in patients with biliary pancreatitis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including patients with a diagnosis of biliary pancreatitis. One hundred and fifty-four patients were included. Thirty-three patients (21.5%) were diagnosed with CBD stone by endoscopic ultrasound (US).

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, age (OR: 1.048, = 0.0004), aspartate transaminase (OR: 1.002, = 0.0015), alkaline phosphatase (OR: 1.005, = 0.0005), gamma-glutamyl transferase (OR: 1.003, = 0.0002) and CBD width by US (OR: 1.187, = 0.0445) were associated with CBD stone. In multivariate analysis, three parameters were identified to predict CBD stone; age (OR: 1.062, = 0.0005), gamma-glutamyl transferase level (OR: 1.003, = 0.0003) and dilated CBD (OR: 3.685, = 0.027), with area under the curve of 0.8433. We developed a diagnostic score that included the three significant parameters on multivariate analysis, with assignment of weights for each variable according to the co-efficient estimate. A score that ranges from 51.28 to 73.7 has a very high specificity (90%-100%) for CBD stones, while a low score that ranges from 9.16 to 41.04 has a high sensitivity (82%-100%). By performing internal validation, the negative predictive value of the low score group was 93%.

CONCLUSION

We recommend incorporating this score as an aid for stratifying patients with acute biliary pancreatitis into low or high probability for the presence of CBD stone.

摘要

背景

急性胆源性胰腺炎发作后胆总管结石残留至关重要,因为必须取出结石。

目的

生成一种简单的非侵入性评分,以预测胆源性胰腺炎患者是否存在胆总管结石。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入诊断为胆源性胰腺炎的患者。共纳入154例患者。33例患者(21.5%)经内镜超声检查诊断为胆总管结石。

结果

单因素分析中,年龄(比值比:1.048,P = 0.0004)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(比值比:1.002,P = 0.0015)、碱性磷酸酶(比值比:1.005,P = 0.0005)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(比值比:1.003,P = 0.0002)以及超声测量的胆总管宽度(比值比:1.187,P = 0.0445)与胆总管结石相关。多因素分析中,确定了三个预测胆总管结石的参数;年龄(比值比:1.062,P = 0.0005)、γ-谷氨酰转移酶水平(比值比:1.003,P = 0.0003)和胆总管扩张(比值比:3.685,P = 0.027),曲线下面积为0.8433。我们根据多因素分析中的三个显著参数制定了一个诊断评分,并根据系数估计为每个变量赋予权重。评分在51.28至73.7之间对胆总管结石具有非常高的特异性(90%-100%),而评分在9.16至41.04之间具有高敏感性(82%-至100%)。通过内部验证,低分组合的阴性预测值为93%。

结论

我们建议将该评分作为一种辅助手段,用于将急性胆源性胰腺炎患者分为胆总管结石存在可能性低或高的类别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc50/7190963/01ea7434f8a2/WJCC-8-1414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc50/7190963/58a21f48b7da/WJCC-8-1414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc50/7190963/01ea7434f8a2/WJCC-8-1414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc50/7190963/58a21f48b7da/WJCC-8-1414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc50/7190963/01ea7434f8a2/WJCC-8-1414-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bedside score predicting retained common bile duct stone in acute biliary pancreatitis.预测急性胆源性胰腺炎中胆总管结石残留的床边评分
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Apr 26;8(8):1414-1423. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414.
2
A validated score predicting common bile duct stone in patients hospitalized with acute calculus cholecystitis: a multi-center retrospective study.一种经验证的评分系统,可用于预测因急性胆石性胆囊炎住院的患者的胆总管结石:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3709-3715. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07853-5. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
3
Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis.预测急性胆源性胰腺炎早期的胆总管结石。
Endoscopy. 2011 Jan;43(1):8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255866. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
4
Selective management of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis.急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的选择性处理。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Dec;13(12):2183-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1041-1. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
5
Predicting common bile duct stones by non-invasive parameters.通过非侵入性参数预测胆总管结石。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020 Jun;19(3):266-270. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
Early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective pilot study.急性胆源性胰腺炎的早期内镜超声检查:一项前瞻性初步研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 28;21(36):10427-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10427.
7
Predictive factors for synchronous common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis.胆石症患者同步性胆总管结石的预测因素
Surg Endosc. 1997 Sep;11(9):928-32. doi: 10.1007/s004649900489.
8
Utility of the "BATS" Score in Predicting Choledocholithiasis in Patients With Gall Bladder Stones.“BATS”评分在预测胆囊结石患者胆总管结石中的应用价值
Cureus. 2023 Jul 25;15(7):e42445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42445. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.磁共振胰胆管成像对急性胆源性胰腺炎胆管结石的诊断价值。
Pancreatology. 2018 Jan;18(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
10
The role of clinical and biochemical criteria and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the urgent diagnosis of common bile duct stones in acute pancreatitis.临床及生化标准和内镜逆行胰胆管造影在急性胰腺炎胆总管结石紧急诊断中的作用
Surgery. 1986 Oct;100(4):732-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning models compared to existing criteria for noninvasive prediction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-confirmed choledocholithiasis.与现有标准相比,机器学习模型用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影确诊的胆总管结石的无创预测
Liver Res. 2021 Dec;5(4):224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute pancreatitis: current perspectives on diagnosis and management.急性胰腺炎:诊断与管理的当前观点
J Inflamm Res. 2018 Mar 9;11:77-85. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S135751. eCollection 2018.
2
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.磁共振胰胆管成像对急性胆源性胰腺炎胆管结石的诊断价值。
Pancreatology. 2018 Jan;18(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
3
Accuracy of ASGE high-risk criteria in evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
ASGE 高危标准在疑似胆总管结石患者评估中的准确性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):525-532. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
4
Acute Pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1972-1981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505202.
5
Single-stage laparoscopic management of acute gallstone pancreatitis: outcomes at different timings.急性胆石性胰腺炎的单阶段腹腔镜治疗:不同时机的治疗结果
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Jun;15(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60065-6.
6
Accuracy of ASGE criteria for the prediction of choledocholithiasis.美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)预测胆总管结石标准的准确性。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016 Jun;108(6):309-14. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.4212/2016.
7
Role and timing of endoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis.内镜检查在急性胆源性胰腺炎中的作用及时机
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 28;21(40):11205-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11205.
8
Morbid Obesity Is Associated With Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Propensity-Matched Study.病态肥胖与急性胰腺炎的不良临床结局相关:一项倾向匹配研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;110(11):1608-19. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.343. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术与术中胆管造影术在胆总管结石诊断中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD010339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010339.pub2.
10
Validation and improvement of a proposed scoring system to detect retained common bile duct stones in gallstone pancreatitis.一种用于检测胆石性胰腺炎中胆总管结石残留的拟议评分系统的验证与改进
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 21.