Unit of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Clínico Andrés Bello. Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela; Department of Endoscopy, Hospital de Clínicas Caracas. Caracas, Venezuela.
Department of Endoscopy, Hospital de Clínicas Caracas. Caracas, Venezuela.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2020 Jan-Mar;40(1):7-12.
Adequate bowel preparation is one of the most important factors related to the yield of colonoscopy. Lowquality bowel preparation has been associated with lower adenoma detection rates and increased healthcare expenses. Bowel preparation is a major impediment to undergo colonoscopy since it is perceived as an unpleasant experience by patients.
This study was aimed to assess tolerance and acceptability of the bowel preparation using either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or mannitol solution.
We enrolled 140 patients with indications of screening for colorectal cancer or with suspected large bowel diseases. They received either mannitol solution or PEG as bowel preparation. Patients were asked to fill a questionnaire about the bowel preparation experience.
Patients perceived more burdensome the preparation with PEG than mannitol for the variables nausea overall experience, post-procedure discomfort, disagreeable flavor, volume ingested and cost (p<0.05). A similar tolerance was reported for abdominal pain, bloating and anal irritation (p>0.05). The acceptability was 82.9% and 71.4% in the Mannitol group and in the PEG group, respectively (p=0.10).
Acceptance of the bowel preparation between mannitol solution and PEG was comparable. However, mannitol was better tolerated by the patients in regard to most of the evaluated items.
充分的肠道准备是与结肠镜检查效果相关的最重要因素之一。肠道准备质量不佳与腺瘤检出率降低和医疗费用增加有关。由于患者认为肠道准备是一种不愉快的体验,因此肠道准备是进行结肠镜检查的主要障碍。
本研究旨在评估聚乙二醇(PEG)或甘露醇溶液进行肠道准备的耐受性和可接受性。
我们招募了 140 名有结直肠癌筛查指征或疑似大肠疾病的患者。他们接受甘露醇溶液或 PEG 作为肠道准备。患者被要求填写一份关于肠道准备体验的问卷。
患者认为 PEG 比甘露醇在恶心总体体验、检查后不适、味道不佳、摄入的液体量和成本方面更具负担(p<0.05)。对于腹痛、腹胀和肛门刺激,两种药物的耐受性相似(p>0.05)。甘露醇组和 PEG 组的接受率分别为 82.9%和 71.4%(p=0.10)。
甘露醇溶液和 PEG 之间的肠道准备接受度相当。然而,在大多数评估项目中,甘露醇的耐受性更好。